[/b]
I kinda figured you stopped reading about there.
Well, quit figuring that way because you're wrong.
Have you considered doing a little thinking for yourself? Like maybe thinking about the difference between the concentration of things delivered to the the fetus in vitro and what is delivered via breast milk.
No. I've never had a thought in my life. :roll:
None other than it's irrelevant to the thread. No one is talking about some pregnant woman drinking. No one is disputing that drinking while pregnant can harm the fetus.
Good. I hope no-one is disputing that alcohol in breast milk can be harmful, either.
I don't mind directness at all. You're not being direct, you're acting rude. It's pretty funny that you expect for others to respect you while showing little yourself.
No more rude than you, Dude. And I do show respect for people here. If you haven't seen any it's probably because you have no idea what it is.
Whatever, I disregard stupid ideas like this. Hugs like respect are earned. As well I'll point out that a person deserving of respect is respectful when they are a guest. More so when they are new to a community which this is. So far, I haven't seen that you are respectful nor deserving of any respect here.
To point it in your terms, "whatever".
And I feel sorry for you.
Oh, well. I am soooo crushed.:roll:
For some self proclaimed archaeologist, you're not too good at history.
And you aren't very good at reading. Wrong field of study. But, yes I hated history. Anthropology isn't history. There is physical anthro and cultural anthro.
Of course the assault from her boyfriend is in the police report.
How about that.Perhaps they investigated that further. It doesn't say in the news item.
Nothing at all about FAS is. Nothing at all about the mother drinking while pregnant. So much for you and the facts.
Look back, UF, and you'll notice I apologized for all that. I also accepted that I was confusing fetus' and babies in a reply to Karrie's post.
How very gracious of you to keep bringing it up like old puke.
Yet they still need to have a Breathalyzer or blood test showing alcohol levels are above the legal limit in court. Imagine the Court won't even take the good word of a police officer.
Whatever. The point is that the cops thought she was acting irresponsibly and neglectful in feeding her child while drunk. Whether charges stuck or not is irrelevant, it may have been the cops' intention just to scare her from doing it again.
Oh I see, your "experience" is it? Is that your field work experience or your Mommy experience? Personally I think you watch too much TV. But that's just my opinion.
"Our officers handle it so much that it is pretty much a general knowledge thing to know when someone is intoxicated. It's pretty obvious." So much for being just my opinion. Look, Having a husband who's a firefighter makes the opportunity to know cops quite a bit higher than Jane Doe, average citizen. So, no, it isn't my "field work experience" or my "mommy" experience. It's a wife experience. So what?
Yeah the concept that you're out to lunch on this topic. It's straight forward if you don't mind jumping to conclusions and visiting fascist notions of harsh penalties on naive young ladies where a little counseling and support would solve the problem.
Consider the world beyond your nose.
Speaking of jumping to conclusions, Mr. Pot......
I guess you missed a previous post of mine where I had stated what I would do, given that I were the judge. But then, you seem like the type to skim over what doesn't jive with your opinion and stick your finger in the icing of what does support you.
She is hardly a naive young lady. The cops had a record on her from before, according to the news item. But I guess that is another part you bypassed because it didn';t fit with your interpretation.