what kind of garbage logic is this? at some point you'll have to put 2 and 2 together and realize capitalism is a failure, if you're not a part of the 0.01% anyways,.Could it be because they are not failures of capitalism? If they were capitalist they would not be failures.
For forms of government let fools contestAnything can work, as long as everyone works hard at making it work. Who needs to work hard if you have everything even if you don't work?
And right their is the flaw of communism in its most simplified form
what kind of garbage logic is this? at some point you'll have to put 2 and 2 together and realize capitalism is a failure, if you're not a part of the 0.01% anyways,.
nah. the beginning of capitalism started with genocide. columbus genocided the natives, in pursuit for gold and other riches. the spanish brought slaves from Hispaniola back to Spain, those whom survived the trip anyways. they became domestic slaves to an arbitrary hierarchy. destroy capitalism.Capitalism was great in the beginning. It made everyone equals, and then the race started. Capitalism is simply a game of who will become the king. But we are so far into the game most of us have absolutely no chance at ever winning.
COPY PASTA FROM ANOTHER FORUM
![]()
There's an oxymoron if I ever heard one.thriving communist country
Nah, the beginning of capitalism had its roots in the Middle ages. Feudalism can certainly be considered a precursor to capitalism. Although one could just as easily argue that the entire mercantile trade throughout history was capitalism in action.nah. the beginning of capitalism started with genocide. columbus genocided the natives, in pursuit for gold and other riches. the spanish brought slaves from Hispaniola back to Spain, those whom survived the trip anyways. they became domestic slaves to an arbitrary hierarchy. destroy capitalism.
None of what you wrote is close to accurate , it's nothing but a babble of liberal nonsense.There's an oxymoron if I ever heard one.
The simple fact is, both socialism and capitalism suck without the other.
Socialism without capitalism is communism. But capitalism without socialism is fascism.
We've seen what extreme socialism/communism does to countries. It stifles their innovation. Look at the Chinese. For centuries they were innovators. They invented stuff, they improved stuff. Their contributions are still used around the world. Today, they're no longer innovators but imitators, and cheap ones at that. When's the last time you heard of any real innovation coming out of China, or Denmark or Norway for that matter?
Capitalism is what allows countries to build proper infrastructure, make technological advances, have a thriving economy etc. Of course that's only when capitalism isn't completely free and utterly unfettered. That's where socialism comes in. Socialism is required to temper capitalism because when capitalism is unrestrained, it can destroy lives and a country just as easily as unrestrained socialism can, just in a different way.
There's a reason why most things that fly have two wings working equally in conjunction with each other, it's so they don't crash and burn. A country is no different.
Nah, the beginning of capitalism had its roots in the Middle ages. Feudalism can certainly be considered a precursor to capitalism. Although one could just as easily argue that the entire mercantile trade throughout history was capitalism in action.
What I described really is the beginnings of imperialism, which is the main engine modern Capitalism fuels itself on.Nah, the beginning of capitalism had its roots in the Middle ages. Feudalism can certainly be considered a precursor to capitalism. Although one could just as easily argue that the entire mercantile trade throughout history was capitalism in action.
That is just retarded.Quoting a retard to prove your point is counterproductive.
Capitalism is the scourge of humanity and all life on Earth. Communism didn't do any better and self destructed, as will capitalism. It is already in its death throws. What we need is to stop parading these two tired old paradigms as if they are useful and come up with something new that is more equitable and less destructive.
![]()
That is just retarded.