COVID-19 'Pandemic'

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
23,730
1,688
113
55 People Died in US After Receiving COVID-19 Vaccines: Reporting System

55 People Died in US After Receiving COVID-19 Vaccines: Reporting System

BY ZACHARY STIEBER

January 16, 2021 Updated: January 16, 2021
biggersmaller
Print
Fifty-five people in the United States have died after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine, according to reports submitted to a federal system.
Deaths have occurred among people receiving both the Moderna and the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines, according to the reports.
The reporting system, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), is a federal database. The system is passive, meaning reports aren’t automatically collected and must be filed. VAERS reports can be filed by anyone, including health care providers, patients, or family members.
VAERS reports “often lack details and sometimes can have information that contains errors,” according to the reporting system’s website. Still, reports on VAERS represent “only a small fraction of actual adverse events,” the site states, though underreporting is believed to be less common for serious events.
In some cases, patients died within days of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
23,730
1,688
113
The game has not started yet . How do you know the stadium is packed ?
ALBANY — A lucky 6,700 members of the Bills Mafia will be able to watch their team live and in-person next month as the team competes in an AFC wild card game.
Gov. Cuomo said Wednesday that state officials and team leadership worked out a test-heavy pilot plan that could be replicated for other large gatherings in 2021 as COVID vaccinations continue and the general population reaches “herd immunity.”

“This is a pilot to find ways where we can smartly and safely reopen businesses,” the governor said during a press briefing in Albany. “It can’t be that we start 2021 with the expectation that the economy will open when the vaccine hits critical mass.

“We can’t take six months, nine months, 12 months of a closed-down economy,” he added.


I guess there are different definitions for the word packed in the new normal...
Oo
I hate to see what packed means now when the are talking about things like "Oranges are packed full of vitamin C".

 
Last edited:
  • Wow
Reactions: Twin_Moose

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
20,514
1,225
113
B.C.
ALBANY — A lucky 6,700 members of the Bills Mafia will be able to watch their team live and in-person next month as the team competes in an AFC wild card game.
Gov. Cuomo said Wednesday that state officials and team leadership worked out a test-heavy pilot plan that could be replicated for other large gatherings in 2021 as COVID vaccinations continue and the general population reaches “herd immunity.”

“This is a pilot to find ways where we can smartly and safely reopen businesses,” the governor said during a press briefing in Albany. “It can’t be that we start 2021 with the expectation that the economy will open when the vaccine hits critical mass.

“We can’t take six months, nine months, 12 months of a closed-down economy,” he added.


I guess there are different definitions for the word packed in the new normal...
Oo
I hate to see what packed means now when the are talking about things like "Oranges are packed full of vitamin C".

Bill did want to attend after all .
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Danbones

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
23,730
1,688
113
So, you conclude Bills stadium will be "packed" because the pre-game show didn't mention Covid?

OK.
Parler CEO John Matze, Family Forced Into Hiding Due to Death Threats, Security Breaches: Filing

Parler CEO John Matze, Family Forced Into Hiding Due to Death Threats, Security Breaches: Filing

Parler's CEO has gone into hiding with his family after receiving death threats, according to a new court ...
www.theepochtimes.com
www.theepochtimes.com

Yeah, looks like the " Shut yer mouf", "can't win an argument with facts", globalist, fascist, commie, nazi, chickentard, fkheds are on the loose...

Oh How yah doin' Tec?

...didn't see you standin' there!

Speaking of foot ball...



Wanna toss one around after school?
 

bob the dog

Electoral Member
Aug 14, 2020
438
275
63
It must have been a game played earlier in the year. Not that in to the NFL. Mostly curious.
So, you conclude Bills stadium will be "packed" because the pre-game show didn't mention Covid?

OK.
I thought I would tune in to see what is going on. Ravens were playing the Bills on the NFL network. The stadium was full. Bills were in red. Maybe it was last year.

So now you have to come in with some condescending remark. My observation that the stadium was packed is because the stadium was packed. Nothing to do with covid.

OK?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Danbones

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
44,946
377
83
Washington DC
So, when you posted "Packed stadium in Buffalo to watch the Bills sends a mixed message." in a thread titled "Covid-19 'Pandemic'," you weren't referring to Covid.

OK.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
23,730
1,688
113
Dr Anthony Fauci Genocide - Hid and Lied about HCQ CoVid Cure and Treatment

Dr Anthony Fauci Hid and Lied HCQ CoVid Cure and Treatment - to Promote Genocide
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Twin_Moose

Serryah

House Member
Dec 3, 2008
4,320
163
63
New Brunswick
Sadly, none here will take it seriously but, in case it wasn't read before...

 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
96,218
2,165
113
Moccasin Flats
Sadly, none here will take it seriously but, in case it wasn't read before...

I see. Its good to know its harsher on hospitalized veterans.

Keep trying.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Twin_Moose

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
23,730
1,688
113
Sadly, none here will take it seriously but, in case it wasn't read before...

Are you freakin insane AND full of it too?

Its harsher on veterans and old people with co morbidities because after a false positive, people aren't getting treated for what is really wrong!

So you can quit with the condescending BS dearie. KARENS like you are partly RESPONSIBELE FOR THE RESULTING DEATHS.

WHO (finally) admits PCR tests create false positivesWarnings concerning high CT value of tests are months too late…so why are they appearing now? The potential explanation is shockingly cynical.​


The World Health Organization released a guidance memo on December 14th, warning that high cycle thresholds on PCR tests will result in false positives.

While this information is accurate, it has also been available for months, so we must ask: why are they reporting it now? Is it to make it appear the vaccine works?

The “gold standard” Sars-Cov-2 tests are based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR works by taking nucleotides – tiny fragments of DNA or RNA – and replicating them until they become something large enough to identify. The replication is done in cycles, with each cycle doubling the amount of genetic material. The number of cycles it takes to produce something identifiable is known as the “cycle threshold” or “CT value”. The higher the CT value, the less likely you are to be detecting anything significant.

This new WHO memo states that using a high CT value to test for the presence of Sars-Cov-2 will result in false-positive results.

To quote their own words [our emphasis]:

Users of RT-PCR reagents should read the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is necessary to account for any background noise which may lead to a specimen with a high cycle threshold (Ct) value result being interpreted as a positive result.
They go on to explain [again, our emphasis]:

The design principle of RT-PCR means that for patients with high levels of circulating virus (viral load), relatively few cycles will be needed to detect virus and so the Ct value will be low. Conversely, when specimens return a high Ct value, it means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.
Of course, none of this is news to anyone who has been paying attention. That PCR tests were easily manipulated and potentially highly inaccurate has been one of the oft-repeated battle cries of those of us opposing the “pandemic” narrative, and the policies it’s being used to sell.

Many articles have been written about it, by many experts in the field, medical journalists and other researchers. It’s been commonly available knowledge, for months now, that any test using a CT value over 35 is potentially meaningless.

Dr Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR process, was clear that it wasn’t meant as a diagnostic tool, saying:

with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.”
And, commenting on cycle thresholds, once said:

If you have to go more than 40 cycles to amplify a single-copy gene, there is something seriously wrong with your PCR.”
The MIQE guidelines for PCR use state:

Cq values higher than 40 are suspect because of the implied low efficiency and generally should not be reported,”
This has all been public knowledge since the beginning of the lockdown. The Australian government’s own website admitted the tests were flawed, and a court in Portugal ruled they were not fit for purpose.

Even Dr Anthony Fauci has publicly admitted that a cycle threshold over 35 is going to be detecting “dead nucleotides”, not a living virus.

Despite all this, it is known that many labs around the world have been using PCR tests with CT values over 35, even into the low 40s.

So why has the WHO finally decided to say this is wrong? What reason could they have for finally choosing to recognise this simple reality?

The answer to that is potentially shockingly cynical: We have a vaccine now. We don’t need false positives anymore.

Notionally, the system has produced its miracle cure. So, after everyone has been vaccinated, all the PCR tests being done will be done “under the new WHO guidelines”, and running only 25-30 cycles instead of 35+.

Lo and behold, the number of “positive cases” will plummet, and we’ll have confirmation that our miracle vaccine works.


...so much for the genocidal liar.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
44,224
939
113
Sadly, none here will take it seriously but, in case it wasn't read before...

The death rates for covid have been highly exaggerated, as we've pointed out before. You could get hit by a train and your death is recorded as being from covid.

There's also a shitload of false positives. Being are even getting positive results even though they haven't even had a test. It's weird how some people can't even see all this.

In Britain, more people died in 2020 from the flu.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
23,730
1,688
113
The death rates for covid have been highly exaggerated, as we've pointed out before. You could get hit by a train and your death is recorded as being from covid.

There's also a shitload of false positives. Being are even getting positive results even though they haven't even had a test. It's weird how some people can't even see all this.

In Britain, more people died in 2020 from the flu.
They can't see that just like they can't see how the commie/nazie/fascist globalist banker run CLOWNZ are the ones leaving POO inside the capitol building.

From Serryah's link above:

"COVID-19 patients with the highest risk of death included those aged 75 and older who also had chronic kidney disease or dementia, and Blacks who were obese, or who had diabetes or kidney disease.

The study also found that COVID-19 patients were four times more likely to require breathing machines, nearly 2.5 times more likely to be admitted to intensive care, and stayed in the hospital an average of three days longer than flu patients."

READ:

A ventilator can help patients unable to breathe on their own, but the experience of COVID-19 patients has been sobering for doctors.
Taechit Taechamanodom/Getty Images
Most coronavirus patients who end up on ventilators go on to die, according to several small studies from the U.S., China and Europe.

And many of the patients who continue to live can't be taken off the mechanical breathing machines.

"It's very concerning to see how many patients who require ventilation do not make it out of the hospital," says Dr. Tiffany Osborn, a critical care specialist at Washington University in St. Louis who has been caring for coronavirus patients at Barnes-Jewish Hospital.

That concern is echoed by Negin Hajizadeh, a pulmonary critical care doctor at the Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell on Long Island, N.Y.

"We have had several patients between the hospitals across the Northwell system that have come off the breathing machine," Hajizadeh says. "But the vast majority are unable to."

The largest study so far to look at mortality among coronavirus patients on ventilators was done by the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre in London. It found that among 98 ventilated patients in the U.K., just 33 were discharged alive.


The numbers from a study of Wuhan, China, are even grimmer. Only 3 of 22 ventilated patients survived.

And a study of 18 ventilated patients in Washington state found that nine were still alive when the study ended, but only six had recovered enough to breathe on their own.

All the early research suggests that once coronavirus patients are placed on a ventilator, they will probably need to stay on it for weeks. And the longer patients remain on a breathing machine, the more likely they are to die.

"We're not sure how much help ventilators are going to be," Osborn says. "They may help keep somebody alive in the short term. We're not sure if it's going to help keep someone alive in the long term."

Patients need a ventilator when their lungs can no longer deliver enough oxygen to keep the body going. And it's an extreme measure, Osborn says.

"We give sedation so the person goes to sleep. Then we provide a paralytic that stops their breathing," she says.

Next, a long plastic tube is inserted through the trachea and vocal cords. That allows a machine to deliver small puffs of highly oxygenated air to the lungs.

Unfortunately, Osborn says, "the ventilator itself can do damage to the lung tissue based on how much pressure is required to help oxygen get processed by the lungs."


And coronavirus patients often need dangerously high levels of both pressure and oxygen because their lungs have so much inflammation.

Another risk from being on a ventilator is that the tube carrying air and extra oxygen to the lungs provides a pathway for dangerous germs. Many ventilated patients get a new lung infection, a problem known as ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Ventilators have been seen as critical to treating coronavirus patients because the devices are very successful when used to treat common forms of pneumonia, says Hajizadeh.
 
Last edited: