Bin Laden Warns US of More Attacks

[darkbeaver]

Stop scaring people Cliffy, they might get you confused with a T-Person.

 

[Cliffy]

Stop scaring people Cliffy, they might get you confused with a T-Person.

Now you are scaring me. What's a T-person?8O

 

[Goober]

Now Goober! Play nice!

I have been nicer to my dear friend JBeee - You know the old saying - Hold your friends closely.

 

[darkbeaver]

Now you are scaring me. What's a T-person?8O

a terrorist, the scary people who hide under the steps in the cellar, you can't just go arround booing people anymore without getting tazered and x-rayed

 

[Goober]

a terrorist, the scary people who hide under the steps in the cellar

What would you call those that bombed the train stations in Madrid or the Buses in London.

 

[AnnaG]

What would you call those that bombed the train stations in Madrid or the Buses in London.

Nuts, I guess. According to Cliffy, we can't call them Taliban or Al Quaida because such things don't exist.
It kind of reminds me of the old American propaganda that insisted there was no such thing as organised crime called "Mafia". lol

 

[petros]

they believe al Qaeda leader bin Laden and his mainly Arab senior associates are still based in the remote Afghanistan-Pakistan border region

Remote? We have equipment sending information from outside the solar system but they really want me to belive a handfull of mtn ranges digitally detailed and monitored from space to 150mm resolution is remote?

That is so hillarious.

 

[AnnaG]

Remote? We have equipment sending information from outside the solar system but they really want me to belive a handfull of mtn ranges digitally detailed and monitored from space to 150mm resolution is remote?

That is so hillarious.

It seems odd, doesn't it? So much for western counter-intelligence officials. lol

 

[Cliffy]

What do you call the people who bomb the crap out of an entire country, destroy all their infrastructure and then send in armed troops to clean up the mess and keep the peasants under control?

 

[Cliffy]

It seems odd, doesn't it? So much for western counter-intelligence officials. lol

Doesn't counter-intelligence mean against intelligence or "not intelligent"?

 

[petros]

It seems odd, doesn't it? So much for western counter-intelligence officials. lol

When the bin Taliqaeda is part of the western counter-intelligence it makes perfect sense.

 

[darkbeaver]

Remote? We have equipment sending information from outside the solar system but they really want me to belive a handfull of mtn ranges digitally detailed and monitored from space to 150mm resolution is remote?

That is so hillarious.

He is hiding on the space station. Make the call I will split the bounty with you, 70/30 ok.

 

[darkbeaver]

The counter -intelligence people turn out to be counter to intelligence! How can that be a surprise?

 

[Cliffy]

Nuts, I guess. According to Cliffy, we can't call them Taliban or Al Quaida because such things don't exist.
It kind of reminds me of the old American propaganda that insisted there was no such thing as organised crime called "Mafia". lol

Taliban may exist but the term is being loosely bantered about to mean anybody shooting back. It is amazing that after 8 or 9 years of "looking" for Al Quaida and Bin laden that we have found only a couple of bodies that we are told are the enemy but we have nobody's word for it but that of "counter intelligence".

 

[AnnaG]

What do you call the people who bomb the crap out of an entire country, destroy all their infrastructure and then send in armed troops to clean up the mess and keep the peasants under control?

Nuts, like I said.

 

[petros]

He is hiding on the space station. Make the call I will split the bounty with you, 70/30 ok.

We're gonna need a really big potato gun to give I.S.iS a black eye.

We'll need to get up higher to do it. I know. How about we set up in the Himalayas where it's nice and high and apparently in the blind spot?

We could always be neighbourly and invite the bin Taliqaeda over for a nice cup of darjeeling afterward.

 

[darkbeaver]

What would you call those that bombed the train stations in Madrid or the Buses in London.

I would call them pricks.

 

[darkbeaver]

We're gonna need a really big potato gun to give I.S.iS a black eye.

We'll need to get up higher to do it. I know. How about we set up in the Himalayas where it's nice and high and apparently in the blind spot?

We could always be neighbourly and invite the bin Taliqaeda over for a nice cup of darjeeling afterward.

Yeah it's out of our hands I guess. I live in Nova Scotia, the Taliban are way down on the the local food chain and it will be a while before they conduct an assault on our sea wall but Peter says they are coming so we have to contribute extra taxes to the war effort. But we shouldn't complain after all it is to save us, looking forward.

 

[DaSleeper]

Ann Coulter's answer to Jbee.......I know it's an old one:lol::lol::lol:
Jbeee hates Ann Coulter8O

IF ONLY BIN LADEN HAD A STAINED BLUE DRESS ...
by Ann Coulter
September 13, 2006

If you wonder why it took 50 years to get the truth about Joe McCarthy, consider the fanatical campaign of the Clinton acolytes to kill an ABC movie that relies on the 9/11 Commission Report, which whitewashed only 90 percent of Clinton's cowardice and incompetence in the face of terrorism, rather than 100 percent.

Islamic jihadists attacked America year after year throughout the Clinton administration. They did everything but blow up his proverbial "bridge to the 21st century." Every year but one, Clinton found an excuse not to fight back.

The first month Clinton was in office, Islamic terrorists with suspected links to al-Qaida and Saddam Hussein bombed the World Trade Center.

For the first time ever, a terrorist act against America was treated not as a matter of national security, but exclusively as a simple criminal offense.

Obama is doing it again..............

The individual bombers were tried in a criminal court. (The one plotter who got away fled to Iraq, that peaceful haven of kite-flying children until Bush invaded and turned it into a nation of dangerous lunatics.)

In 1995 and 1996, various branches of the Religion of Peace — al-Qaida, Hezbollah and the Iranian "Party of God" — staged car bomb attacks on American servicemen in Saudi Arabia, killing 24 members of our military in all. Each time, the Clinton administration came up with an excuse to do nothing.

Despite the Democrats' current claim that only the capture of Osama bin Laden will magically end terrorism forever, Clinton turned down Sudan's offer to hand us bin Laden in 1996. That year, Mohammed Atta proposed the 9/11 attack to bin Laden.

Clinton refused the handover of bin Laden because — he said in taped remarks on Feb. 15, 2002 — "(bin Laden) had committed no crime against America, so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him." Luckily, after 9/11, we can get him on that trespassing charge.

Although Clinton made the criminal justice system the entire U.S. counterterrorism strategy, there was not even an indictment filed after the bombing of either Khobar Towers (1996) or the USS Cole (2000). Indictments were not filed until after Bush/Ashcroft came into office.

Only in 1998 did the Clinton-haters ("normal people") force Clinton into a military response. Solely because of the Monica Lewinsky scandal, Clinton finally lobbed a few bombs in the general direction of Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden.

In August 1998, three days after Clinton admitted to the nation that he did in fact have "sex with that woman," he bombed Afghanistan and Sudan, doing about as much damage as another Clinton fusillade did to a blue Gap dress.

The day of Clinton's scheduled impeachment, Dec. 18, 1998, he bombed Iraq. This accomplished two things: (1) It delayed his impeachment for one day, and (2) it got a lot of Democrats on record about the monumental danger of Saddam Hussein and his weapons of mass destruction.

So don't tell me impeachment "distracted" Clinton from his aggressive pursuit of terrorists. He never would have bombed anyone if it weren't for the Clinton-haters.

As soon as Clinton was no longer "distracted" by impeachment, he went right back to doing nothing in response to terrorism. In October 2000, al-Qaida bombed the USS Cole, killing 17 sailors and nearly sinking the ship.

Clinton did nothing.

According to Rich Miniter, author of "Losing Bin Laden," Clinton's top national security advisers made the following classic Democrat excuses for doing nothing in response to the Cole attack:

— Attorney General Janet Reno "thought retaliation might violate international law and was therefore against it."

— CIA Director George Tenet "wanted more definitive proof that bin Laden was behind the attack, although he personally thought he was."

— Secretary of State Madeleine Albright "was concerned about the reaction of world opinion to a retaliation against Muslims and the impact it would have in the final days of the Clinton Middle East peace process." (How did that turn out, by the way? Big success, I take it? Everybody over there all friendly with one another?)

— Secretary of Defense William Cohen "did not consider the Cole attack 'sufficient provocation' for a military retaliation."

This is only an abbreviated list of Clinton's surrender to Islamic savagery. For a president who supposedly stayed up all night "working" and hated vacations, Clinton sure spent a lot of time sitting around on his butt while America was being attacked.

Less than a year after Clinton's final capitulation to Islamic terrorists, they staged the largest terrorist attack in history on U.S. soil. The Sept. 11 attack, planning for which began in the '90s, followed eight months of President Bush — but eight years of Bill Clinton.

Clinton's own campaign adviser on Iraq, Laurie Mylroie, says Clinton and his advisers are "most culpable" for the intelligence failure that allowed 9/11 to happen.

Now, after five years of no terrorist attacks in America, Democrats are hoping we'll forget the consequences of the Democrat strategy of doing nothing in response to terrorism and abandon the Bush policies that have kept this nation safe since 9/11. But first, they need to rewrite history.

COPYRIGHT 2006 ANN COULTER

 

[petros]

Yeah it's out of our hands I guess. I live in Nova Scotia, the Taliban are way down on the the local food chain and it will be a while before they conduct an assault on our sea wall but Peter says they are coming so we have to contribute extra taxes to the war effort. But we shouldn't complain after all it is to save us, looking forward.

The bin Taliqaeda navy is a bigger threat than you may think.

They have hijacked two American Canoe Lines canoes and will hit shore sometime between dawn and 16:30 tomorrow afternoon.

A canoe is far quicker than one of those N.S. honky dories, you may have to break out an old whaling harpoon for defensive leverage.