Probably why she hasn't touched it yetCurio has a PhD in Psychology. Maybe she understands some of this.
Why on Earth has this been posted into a Canadian Politics Subforum?
You lost me at California federal law? California is still a state, so are you talking
a Federal U.S. law or a California State law?
This notation covers federal and state law, because the State of California is being charged for violation of aritice 94 in the UCMJ accrding to USS KITTY HAWK (CV 63) Standard operating procedures; citing the following descrepencies:
PUBLIC ENDANGERMENT
WILLFUL MISCONDUCT
DERELECTION OF DUTY
MISSAPPROPRIATION OF GOVERNMENT FUNDS
GROSS NEGLIGENCE
DIOBEYANCE OF LAWFUL ORDER
INCOMPETNCE
MALICIOUS CONDUCT
SEDITION
MUTINY
CONSPIRACTY TO COMMIT TREASON ON A GOVERNMENT BODY
HARBORING A FUGITIVE
UNAUTHORIZED USE OF WEAPSONS RELEASE AUTHORITY
Mandatory automible insruanrance is in violation of article 94 of the UCMJ and is subject to the penalties therof.
[
§ 894. Art. 94. Mutiny or sedition
(a) Any person subject to this chapter who—
(1) with intent to usurp or override lawful military authority, refuses, in concert with any other person, to obey orders or otherwise do his duty or creates any violence or disturbance is guilty of mutiny; (2) with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of lawful civil authority, creates, in concert with any other person, revolt, violence, or other disturbance against that authority is guilty of sedition; (3) fails to do his utmost to prevent and suppress a mutiny or sedition being committed in his presence, or fails to take all reasonable means to inform his superior commissioned officer or commanding officer of a mutiny or sedition which he knows or has reason to believe is taking place, is guilty of a failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition.
(b) A person who is found guilty of attempted mutiny, mutiny, sedition, or failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.
i suppose auto insurance would be a good thing if one is driving an aircraft carrier upon any highway
are you conquerer or the prince of prussia?
I second the motion.....Vote for Ron Paul
What does this crap between mandatory auto ins. and California have to do with Canadian Politics?WHAT DOES MANDATORY AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE HAVE TO DO WITH TRESPASS AGAINST US TREARURY IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA?
In the state of California federal law prohibits mandatory automobile insurance.
Automobile insurance is accepted on the commission of a consent basis; but never mandation.
California federal law rules that mandatory automobile insurance violates treasury authority and contradicts; and or neglects the authority of state board to license and commission, by inducing the racketeer to quota mandated profits.
Mandated profits are a system to overthrow and out buy government treasury assets.
Mandated profits is instigated by any person or group of people that propose or impose legislation that solicits to induce controlling asset over the citizens income allowance for the purpose of confining or reserving the citizen's income allowance as a source of revenue; to force monetary proceeds in order to convene the forgery thereof; quota to pawn; and or induce the act to falsify the surplus of demand to voucher the stock or bonds of a free enterprise or business agency that is not declared as a non -profit organization is called extortion against the United States treasury.
Mandated profits is a system of using the citizen's income allowance as a pawn to over throw treasury assets or controlling authority to a government body.
Mandated profits is a system that uses unlawful revenue to falsify stocks and bonds in order to counterfeit title and deed for the intent to deprive ownership to its legitimate authority; and or, also, the act of sabotaging a common-wealth for the purpose of using unlawful revenue to out-buy or overthrow US treasury assets.
Mandated profits are classified as a trespass against US treasury; tax evasion; fraudulent investment; grand larceny; and conspiracy to commit treason on a government body.
Mandatory automible insruanrance is in violation of article 94 of the UCMJ and is subject to the penalties therof.
so you're saying that mandatory automobile insurance in the state of
california violates the u.s. Uniform code of military justice, and
that's why you posted this into a subforum on canadian politics?
article 94 in the ucmj deals with mutiny and sedition. So are you try'n
to say that mandatory automobile insurance is an intent to usurp or
override u.s. Military authority? Is that where you're going? I'm still
looking for the tie in to canadian politics....
This notation covers federal and state law, because the State of California is being charged for violation of aritice 94 in the UCMJ accrding to USS KITTY HAWK (CV 63) Standard operating procedures; citing the following descrepencies:
PUBLIC ENDANGERMENT
WILLFUL MISCONDUCT
DERELECTION OF DUTY
MISSAPPROPRIATION OF GOVERNMENT FUNDS
GROSS NEGLIGENCE
DIOBEYANCE OF LAWFUL ORDER
INCOMPETNCE
MALICIOUS CONDUCT
SEDITION
MUTINY
CONSPIRACTY TO COMMIT TREASON ON A GOVERNMENT BODY
HARBORING A FUGITIVE
UNAUTHORIZED USE OF WEAPSONS RELEASE AUTHORITY