B.P.'s Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill Thread (it's all here).....

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,239
14,256
113
Low Earth Orbit
I think you are right, but they will wait long enough to pay out big dividends and bonuses first.
Yup. They'll pay what was earned in the quarter prior to the incident and then cut and run. Dollars to donuts says BP ends up being another govt liability like GM.
 

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
BP Refuses to Allow Scientists to Test Oil Spill Samples


Tuesday, 15 June 2010 07:37



'Scientists in Florida are concerned that large plumes of oil floating beneath the surface in the Gulf of Mexico originated from the Deepwater Horizon spill, and want to test their samples against oil collected by BP. But the oil corporation is refusing to cooperate.'
Read more: BP Refuses to Allow Scientists to Test Oil Spill Samples




BP Discouraging Crews From Using Respirators


Tuesday, 15 June 2010 07:48




YouTube - BP discouraging crews from using respirators

BP Death Clouds Already Onshore! Benzene-3400ppb & Hyrdrogen Sulfide-1200ppb TOXIC AIR ALERT

Tags:



YouTube - BP Death Clouds Already Onshore! Benzene-3400ppb & Hyrdrogen Sulfide-1200ppb TOXIC AIR ALERT

for some reason I cant post separate replies, when I try they all seem to come up in the same reply box, sorry if it appears to be screwed up

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

BP Official Admits to Damage BENEATH THE SEA FLOOR

Tags:

The evidence is growing stronger and stronger that there is substantial damage beneath the sea floor. Indeed, it appears that BP officials themselves have admitted to such damage. This has enormous impacts on both the amount of oil leaking into the Gulf, and the prospects for quickly stopping the leak this summer.
 
Last edited:

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
BP wasn't the only one on site, and make no mistake, I am not an apologist for BP, however, my point is that there was more than one group involved.

I find it quite interesting that BP is solely on the hook for this.

BP is the main company that coordinated all the other companies who had parts building the well, if and when the dust settles all companies involved will pay. The public will not let them get away with it.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
I think Tampax should save the day with this mess of oil.....just throwing in my 2 cents

I think it would take a fairly big tampax. :smile:

Crazylady- Were you here before under another "nom de plume"? Your style looks familiar. :lol::lol::lol:
 

crazylady2010

New Member
Jun 15, 2010
10
0
1
Nope sorry not I said the blind lady....no really never seen page till today. That's what happens when u work nights kids in school...I tend to surf the waves of the web.
 

wulfie68

Council Member
Mar 29, 2009
2,014
24
38
Calgary, AB
BP wasn't the only one on site, and make no mistake, I am not an apologist for BP, however, my point is that there was more than one group involved.

I find it quite interesting that BP is solely on the hook for this.

Its not surprising: the owner of a project is usually the one held liable for damages their project causes unless a contractor is found to be negligent in performing their duties. As for the theory of this being a cement job gone wrong, its a nice story but it still doesn't absolve BP: their engineering people would have designed or at the very least approved and signed off on the activities that Halliburton carried out in their well. Blaming Halliburton or the company that they leased the rig from is a blame deflection tactic, nothing more: they still haven't got the message that the best thing they can do to defuse the anger is to clean up their mess and make things right to the people their mess affected.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
29,043
10,985
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
One of the Guys I work with was telling me this morning that after the failed
attempts to cap that well, that BP has another idea to try out.

He say's they'll design a ring out of gold to encircle that jaggedly broken pipe,
and that they'll drop that over the broken pipe, without interrupting it's flow so
that the well's pressure won't be an issue to the rings installation.

Once this "wedding" ring is in place, the well is expected to stop putting out
on its own in very short order.
 

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
One of the Guys I work with was telling me this morning that after the failed
attempts to cap that well, that BP has another idea to try out.

He say's they'll design a ring out of gold to encircle that jaggedly broken pipe,
and that they'll drop that over the broken pipe, without interrupting it's flow so
that the well's pressure won't be an issue to the rings installation.

Once this "wedding" ring is in place, the well is expected to stop putting out
on its own in very short order.
lol that has worked in the past in a majority of cases :lol: but this bitch seems to like putting out.........

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Gulf of Mexico oil spill is flowing at a rate of up to 2.52 million gallons a day, scientists say

Tags:

Scientists provided a new estimate for the amount of oil gushing from the ruptured well in the Gulf of Mexico on Tuesday that indicates it could be leaking up to 2.52 million gallons of crude a day.

 
Last edited:

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
Empty suit makes another empty promise. Not one mention of when.


Obama: 'We Will Make BP Pay for Its Recklessness'

President Obama, in the first televised Oval Office message of his presidency, sought to quell rising anger over his response to the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico by saying he will demand that BP's chairman set aside whatever money is needed to compensate those who have been harmed by the company's "recklessness."
"We will make BP pay for the damage their company has caused," Obama said in an 18-minute speech. "And we will do whatever's necessary to help the Gulf Coast and its people recover from this tragedy."

FOXNews.com - Obama: 'We Will Make BP Pay for Its Recklessness'
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
76
Eagle Creek
BP exec has just agreed to set up an escrow fund in the amount of $20 billion as was requested by President Obama.

Meanwhile, BP clean-up crews have been caught on tape trampling the nests of Brown Pelicans - breaking eggs and killing chicks - and the carnage continues.
 
Last edited:

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
ya know, more and more, some of the statements, language, and posturing coming out of the US government, lead me to suspect the US just may get a national oil company out of this one. I could foresee BP's assets on US coasts and land being seized as punishment and payment for this.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Dividends, they bloody well better pay, bonuses, they bloody well better not. :lol::lol:
Dividends are simply a sharing of the profits. If there are no profits, there is nothing saying companies have to pay dividends.

Yup. They'll pay what was earned in the quarter prior to the incident and then cut and run. Dollars to donuts says BP ends up being another govt liability like GM.
Except I don't think the public will support their gov't bailing out BP. It seems to me a lot of the public was iffy about GM bailouts.

I think Tampax should save the day with this mess of oil.....just throwing in my 2 cents
Pampers might be a better choice. They're designed to absorb more fluids as well as to contain chunks. :D

BP wasn't the only one on site, and make no mistake, I am not an apologist for BP, however, my point is that there was more than one group involved.
Yeah. It's why I posted a link supporting your comment.

I find it quite interesting that BP is solely on the hook for this.
A bit. If BP finds that it is unduly held responsible in some way, there's nothing stopping it from launching a counter-suit or something, though.

Its not surprising: the owner of a project is usually the one held liable for damages their project causes unless a contractor is found to be negligent in performing their duties. As for the theory of this being a cement job gone wrong, its a nice story but it still doesn't absolve BP: their engineering people would have designed or at the very least approved and signed off on the activities that Halliburton carried out in their well. Blaming Halliburton or the company that they leased the rig from is a blame deflection tactic, nothing more: they still haven't got the message that the best thing they can do to defuse the anger is to clean up their mess and make things right to the people their mess affected.
Hence my comment about counter-suits.

One of the Guys I work with was telling me this morning that after the failed
attempts to cap that well, that BP has another idea to try out.

He say's they'll design a ring out of gold to encircle that jaggedly broken pipe,
and that they'll drop that over the broken pipe, without interrupting it's flow so
that the well's pressure won't be an issue to the rings installation.

Once this "wedding" ring is in place, the well is expected to stop putting out
on its own in very short order.
huh?

lol that has worked in the past in a majority of cases :lol: but this bitch seems to like putting out.........

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Gulf of Mexico oil spill is flowing at a rate of up to 2.52 million gallons a day, scientists say

Tags:

Scientists provided a new estimate for the amount of oil gushing from the ruptured well in the Gulf of Mexico on Tuesday that indicates it could be leaking up to 2.52 million gallons of crude a day.

I really find it stupid that these newsmedia do not provide sources for their articles. Which scientists made this new estimate?

ya know, more and more, some of the statements, language, and posturing coming out of the US government, lead me to suspect the US just may get a national oil company out of this one. I could foresee BP's assets on US coasts and land being seized as punishment and payment for this.
Interesting idea. I think you might be right. The public may be more in tune with the idea of a national oil company over bailing one out.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Dividends are simply a sharing of the profits. If there are no profits, there is nothing saying companies have to pay dividends.

.
Heard on the news a few days ago there was $4 billion+ profits in the last quarter alone. These are working people's pensions.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Heard on the news a few days ago there was $4 billion+ profits in the last quarter alone. These are working people's pensions.
Again, I will remind you that the first quarter profit of BP was $6 billion and change, not $4 billion and change. This is the second quarter for BP and I really doubt that any profit will be realised after BP just finished agreeing to Obama's demand for a $20 billion cleanup and compensation tab and the market shares for BP have taken quite a tumble.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Again, I will remind you that the first quarter profit of BP was $6 billion and change, not $4 billion and change. This is the second quarter for BP and I really doubt that any profit will be realised after BP just finished agreeing to Obama's demand for a $20 billion cleanup and compensation tab and the market shares for BP have taken quite a tumble.

I had the recollection of someone correcting me on the $4 billion but couldn't remember what the actual figure was so to be correct I added the "+". :lol::lol: