eeyeaaaah right
neoconservatism | political philosophy | Britannica.com
Radical libertarianism under Harpy? hahahahah
neoconservatism | political philosophy | Britannica.com
Radical libertarianism under Harpy? hahahahah
eeyeaaaah right
neoconservatism | political philosophy | Britannica.com
Radical libertarianism under Harpy? hahahahah
Neoconservatism, the political ideology that combines features of
traditional conservatism with
political individualism and
a endorsement of free markets.
And this has what to do with Harper?From your own link. Essentially Neoconservativism is a promotion of radical individualism and moral relativism that is at the core of Libertarianism.
It denies a role for responsible government or institutions in defining the moral laws of the country and the ethical management of its economy. It's bible is Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand. It defines Harper to tee.. and Mulroney and Chretien.. which is why the country is in such a mess.
The manifestation is a capitulation to supranational pools of capital under the mantra the 'greed is good.. that one must only serve the self.. and economic and social collapse.
I rest my case.
uhuh sure he didHarper followed the NeoCon script to the letter.
Libertarianism isn't a coherent philosophy anyway.
What the NEW conservatives should focus on is creating revenue instead of the constantly failed attempts at austerity. They need to give up this naive ideology that government should stay out of one's lives. That's just koolaid, government will ALWAYS EXIST, so they need to stimulate the economy and get GDP growth.
On the social side, they just need get out of reverse and put the car in neutral and they should be fine.
All one has to do is look at those on this forum that identify themselves as Conservative and ask yourself, would I vote for them if they were running in an election? The fact that these Conservative supporters are more concerned with childish insults of other parties and leaders than dealing with their own issues says an awful lot.
The Conservatives poblem is that in recent years.. and certainly under Steven Harper they were NEVER really Conservative.
They were NEOconservative.. which is a euphemism for Classic British Liberalism.. or radical Libertarianism.
Real Conservatives believe in dirigiste, nationalistic, planned economies.. they believe in the role of institutions in the social structure (like real marriage.. like the formative Christian religion in Western Civilization).. in equitable sharing of wealth.. in responsible Free Enterprise, rather than predatory and exploitative Free Markets. They believe in public ownership of natural monopolies and regulation of markets in the common interest. They believe in traditional values, in family, are pro life.
Harper capitualted to supranational oligarchies of financial and trading interests. He guaranteed himself millions of dollars in board memberships and appointments by selling out his country (along with his sidekick Flaherty). He gave lip service but NEVER any support to conservative social causes.. in which he had virtually no interest.
He is out of office because he's a lying, incompetent, drooling little prick.. without an iota or integrity or real patriotism.. who has done immense damage to Canada.
All one has to do is look at those on this forum that identify themselves as Conservative and ask yourself, would I vote for them if they were running in an election?
I could potentially vote for Colpy. Not sure if CDNbear identifies as conservative exactly but I could vote for him too. But yeah overall, not so much.
Oh how I wish we had them here.
:smile:
Yeah, those two would qualify I think......................got to thinking about Walter too.....................he probably wouldn't take any sh*t from anyone!
In lieu of Crispy you think?![]()
![]()
![]()
All one has to do is look at those on this forum that identify themselves as Conservative and ask yourself, would I vote for them if they were running in an election? The fact that these Conservative supporters are more concerned with childish insults of other parties and leaders than dealing with their own issues says an awful lot.
we all have a little conservative,a little NDP and a little Liberal,BC Liberals are conservatives. To say otherwise is a stretch. Ask any lefty how they feel about them.
All one has to do is look at those on this forum that identify themselves as Conservative and ask yourself, would I vote for them if they were running in an election? The fact that these Conservative supporters are more concerned with childish insults of other parties and leaders than dealing with their own issues says an awful lot.
I'm not looking for candidates here.Well thanks for the vote of non-confidence in our abilities to run in an election but you really have to give your head a shake if an internet forum is the place you are looking for candidates.
conservatives are always mad or hating ......
I could potentially vote for Colpy. Not sure if CDNbear identifies as conservative exactly but I could vote for him too. But yeah overall, not so much.
CB indentifies himself as Conservative but he isn't.
In lieu of all the mainstream parties we have now, JLM. I will be voting Green next election.
I nominate RCS. :smile:
Putz is having another bout of Prairie Madness?
Wow. I learned a new word.
Dirigiste
1.Directed by a central authority; as, a dirigiste economy; with respect to economics, opposed to free-market. See also dirigisme.
Carry on. :smile:
i had a belly laugh at this.thanks for the laugh.No, he doesn't.
all wrong,Mr.Harper is far from an ordinary MP.And what about you still sporting a Harper signature?It shows that he's still in your head and you can't let him go, and he's just an ordinary M.P. now......
probably into dam building.And Alberta
or coal exportsi had a belly laugh at this.thanks for the laugh.
all wrong,Mr.Harper is far from an ordinary MP.
probably into dam building.