Not the fisher type really; not into drugs nor the long days for BS pay, and having 'seasons' off.
But how you tell the difference between em? The non-trans people wear the super expensive stuff; trans people are fine with whatever works
2SLGBTQQIA+
- Thread starter B00Mer
- Start date
Not the fisher type really; not into drugs nor the long days for BS pay, and having 'seasons' off.
But how you tell the difference between em? The non-trans people wear the super expensive stuff; trans people are fine with whatever works
Funny thing about all the people screaming about "women's sports!"
www.nbcdfw.com
The REAL threat to women's sports? That all this screaming about trans women playing is to deflect from the fact women don't get paid NEARLY the same as men, for doing the same work, needing to do the same routine for fitness, etc.
And since the NCAA Women's games brought more views than the men's this year, it's time that if all those anti-trans but so called "pro women" sports supporters really want to see women in sports succeed, they push for equality IN the sports women play.
But I won't hold my breath for the virtue signaling haters.
Caitlin Clark went No. 1 in the WNBA draft. Some fans are outraged at her salary
The University of Iowa star is set to make $338,000 on a four-year rookie deal, compared to $55 million for the No. 1 pick in last year's NBA draft.
www.nbcdfw.com
The REAL threat to women's sports? That all this screaming about trans women playing is to deflect from the fact women don't get paid NEARLY the same as men, for doing the same work, needing to do the same routine for fitness, etc.
And since the NCAA Women's games brought more views than the men's this year, it's time that if all those anti-trans but so called "pro women" sports supporters really want to see women in sports succeed, they push for equality IN the sports women play.
But I won't hold my breath for the virtue signaling haters.
Full credit to the NBA for its aggressive promotion of the WNBA.Funny thing about all the people screaming about "women's sports!"
Caitlin Clark went No. 1 in the WNBA draft. Some fans are outraged at her salary
The University of Iowa star is set to make $338,000 on a four-year rookie deal, compared to $55 million for the No. 1 pick in last year's NBA draft.
The REAL threat to women's sports? That all this screaming about trans women playing is to deflect from the fact women don't get paid NEARLY the same as men, for doing the same work, needing to do the same routine for fitness, etc.
And since the NCAA Women's games brought more views than the men's this year, it's time that if all those anti-trans but so called "pro women" sports supporters really want to see women in sports succeed, they push for equality IN the sports women play.
But I won't hold my breath for the virtue signaling haters.
As to the rest, yeah. "The REAL problem is. . . (pick microscopic number of extreme outliers).
It's like the "GROOMERS!" and child molesters. They're codewording ALL LGBTQRSTUVWXZ people as such, they know it, and their sad little denial of it is as tedious as listening to a not-real-bright seven year old trying to lie his way out of trouble.
Simple fact is the vast majority of people who sexually abuse children are hetero. And bother our commentariat not in the slightest. "Oh," they say, "We've made that ILLEGAL, so problem solved." Apparently blissfully unaware that same sex or who-knows-which-sex child abuse is equally illegal, but that somehow does NOT solve the problem.
Really it's the same crap they repeated years ago against gay men (tends to be a trend, anyone who might be "male" but might also come across as "Female" is somehow the worst thing in the world).
Gay men are pedophiles, gay men will steal children, yada yada...
Now it's just trans people.
In a few years, it might switch back to gays, because, sadly, gay people are joining this BS looney train for gods know what reason.
And I will have no issue admitting that yes, it IS possible that a hetero man could dress up in a dress and pretend to be a woman to get into women's spaces to abuse them, but that does NOT make them trans. It makes them an abuser. And likely, the more a trans woman passes, they're just as liable to be abused as non-trans women would be. At least until the abuser figures out it's a trans woman and then they'll go overboard and likely kill the trans woman.
Or the fact there are hetero men out there who - in thinking it proves something negative - will pretend to be trans themselves and abuse that appearance for a set amount of time. And yes, I'm talking about the so called "Trans teacher with the huge boobs" from what, last year, the year before? The guy who I even said was not likely trans?
Well, shocker, he's not. Never was. But people like him do NOT help those who really are trans manage to live their lives. If anything, it instigates those who hate or revile trans people to shout "See, see, we told you!"
Without them realizing that, because he was NEVER trans, all it does is prove the guy was an absolute asshole and liar. He made a mockery not out of only himself, but trans people, and the school he worked at. All for clout that he failed to get.
When you have things like that piled against you, it should be no surprise trans people get frustrated and pissed about the rest of society.
And we made that illegal, so what's the problem? Like down here we got people saying that guns are no problem because it's ILLEGAL to shoot people without justification. The illegal part is abusing women, so who cares how the abuser's dressed?
Women dont bring in the same revenue as men. If women filled arenas and sold merchandise the same as men theyd get paid the same as men.
I don't know. It's already illegal, it doesn't happen as often as the haters make it seem, and yet they scream that if trans people suddenly go into women's 'spaces' it's almost like every woman that goes into that space is going to be assaulted by a "tranny".
I really don't get it.
Maybe it has to be "more illegal"?
Funny thing about all the people screaming about "women's sports!"
Caitlin Clark went No. 1 in the WNBA draft. Some fans are outraged at her salary
The University of Iowa star is set to make $338,000 on a four-year rookie deal, compared to $55 million for the No. 1 pick in last year's NBA draft.
The REAL threat to women's sports? That all this screaming about trans women playing is to deflect from the fact women don't get paid NEARLY the same as men, for doing the same work, needing to do the same routine for fitness, etc.
And since the NCAA Women's games brought more views than the men's this year, it's time that if all those anti-trans but so called "pro women" sports supporters really want to see women in sports succeed, they push for equality IN the sports women play.
But I won't hold my breath for the virtue signaling haters.
Last edited:
When a Trans is saying it's wrong....
Planet Fitness Is The New Bud Light Over Trans Scandal
Subscribe for more anti-woke content: https://www.youtube.com/theblairewhiteprojectFollow me on Instagram and X: @msblairewhite
youtube.com
"Conclusion While longitudinal transitioning studies of transgender athletes are urgently needed, these results should caution against precautionary bans and sport eligibility exclusions that are not based on sport-specific (or sport-relevant) research."
So... this really is all about hate and bigotry, not about women or kids. So, so not shocked.
Sadly nothing will change.