Absolutely. When the child reaches the age of consent, then they can do what they bloody well want despite what the parents say. |I personally would prefer the age of 25 but since children are legal at 18, I'd go with that. But there needs to be common sense in this whole thing & that's not happening. Children are being mutilated way before they should be if at all.
Is anybody advocating for children to be surgically/hormonally altered here? Seriously?So. . . if a parent wants their child surgically/hormonally altered, that's OK?
Much of the one side of this debate is that Gender isn’t dictated by an individual’s sexual plumbing at birth or whether they’re genetically of the female or male biological sex…yet the push towards surgical and hormonal altering a child’s natural development is advocated somewhere here for that video to exist.
I’m questioning why this is being allowed to happen to children, and so is Dixie Cup above, and you see questioning this as giving consent that it should be happening by either of us? Am I misreading satirical responses? Am I missing the purple writing? I do miss that sorta thing sometimes.
Do I see neutering a child chemically or surgically as a good thing. That’s a hard Nope. Not the school behind a parents back or a parent before a child is mature enough to truly decide for themselves.