2SLGBTQQIA+
- Thread starter B00Mer
- Start date
I think the ability to pull it out and pee quickly and move on rather than putting down the seat and scrubbing it for 10 minutes to make sure its 110% sanitary then doing ones business likely has more to do with the speed of the line.
I'll trust you. I don't spend a lot of time hanging out in ladies' rooms. Never quite seemed to find it quite so fascinating.
I only go with what my wife and daughters have shared over the years when the subject came up.
The family that shares together. . . does something that rhymes with "shares" together.
That’s why I’ve been trying to get somebody to define things for…. For a while.
Someone tried that with me once, a very aggressive woman who apparently thought male sexual response was simple and automatic, like putting coins into a vending machine, push the right buttons and it’ll happen. No so, but there’s a big difference between that and a man sexually assaulting a woman. There was no fear factor, I never doubted I could overpower her and get away if I needed to, which I eventually did. Not without some minor injury, but just bruises and scratches. But the shock and revulsion and the emotional hangover were pretty unpleasant, wouldn’t wish that on anyone.
I took a pee. I took a pee on you...and it was all yellow.
(A riff off of Cold Play's Yellow)
You're dehydrated.
(A riff off of Cold Play's Yellow)
Which means all you really vanted vas a puppy und a pony?
I quit smoking and I can't focus or concentrate on anything anymore...and I'm bored out of my tree. And I've gone from being hi-larry-ous...to well,...about as funny as Carrot Top.
True, when it comes to women raping, I think if it's men they rape, usually it's manipulation - which is a form of power honestly - that it comes from. Though in your case... well I've not so nice words about her.
If a woman rapes a child, it's still power.
Me too. It was actually somewhat worse than my first brief description. She was a friend of my girlfriend at the time, visiting from out of town. I was over to see the girlfriend but she’d had a tough week at work, wasn’t feeling up to going out, and went to bed early, leaving me to chat with her friend for a while before heading home myself. She jumped me with her supposed friend, my girlfriend, sleeping a few meters away. Needless to say, that friendship died after I reported events. Nobody needs a friend who’ll do that. But at least I got away without any damage requiring medical attention.
Unless you count the purely medicinal double rye and coke I poured when I was safely home. I was a bit rattled.
Last edited:
The ultimate expression of power is the ability to use somebody else's body for your sexual gratification, whether they want you to or not.
Yeah, read that again. . . whether they want you to or not.
That's the "power" motivation.
As duelling protests took place in Canadian cities over the issue of gender ideology in schools, a new survey from the Angus Reid Institute revealed that most Canadians support a middle ground: They favour equality and accommodation for trans people, but generally don’t believe men can self-identify as women.
Of respondents, just 35 per cent agreed with the sentiment — now enshrined via a latticework of federal and provincial laws — that “anyone who wishes can identify as a woman.”
About the same number (34 per cent) sided with the notion that women are only those “who were born with female genitalia.” (?)
Another 18 per cent were comfortable with the idea of men legally becoming women, but only if they changed their genitalia through surgery. (?)
(We’re getting into that weird ground again between gender and sex, where some clear definitions are needed to not cloud the issue)
These results suggest that a slim majority of Canadians (52 per cent) are not on board with a recent spate of Canadian legal reforms upholding the principle of gender self-ID; the notion that only a personal attestation is necessary for a Canadian to begin living as a member of a different gender.
Right up until the early 2010s, Canadians generally needed a doctor’s note or proof of sex-reassignment surgery to be legally recognized as a different gender.
But by 2017, a spate of tribunal decisions and policy updates had made self-ID the rule on everything from applying for a passport to playing for Team Canada.
apple.news
The Angus Reid survey, which was released Sept. 19, also found a clear majority of Canadians opposed to the adoption of “gender neutral” terminology, particularly when it came to issues such as menstruation or childbirth. For instance, it is now standard for Canadian public health agencies to use the term “pregnant people” instead of “pregnant women.” Select health agencies have also adopted the term “chestfeeding” as a synonym for “breastfeeding.”
Angus Reid found that 67 per cent of respondents objected to this trend, agreeing with the statement that it “devalues the female identity in society.” Even among under-34 women — usually the group most accepting of gender-neutral language — 50 per cent were opposed.
“For these issues that focus specifically on female identity, motherhood, and birth, there is little appetite for gender-neutral language,” concluded pollsters.
A similar proportion were also opposed to a new trend of attached pronouns (ie: he/him, she/her) to one’s name in emails, social media posts or even in in-person introduction.
(While this is not mandatory among federal civil servants, it is encouraged and increasingly common, with the Department of National Defence even officially observing “International Pronouns Day” every Oct. 15)
Of Angus Reid respondents, 66 per cent disagreed with the statement “everyone should put their pronouns in their social media profiles.”
Meanwhile, that same survey identified several clear indicators that respondents were personally welcoming of trans identities among their social circle, and believed transgender Canadians faced disproportionate rates of discrimination!!
More than two thirds (71 per cent) said transgender Canadians “face a lot of discrimination in their daily lives,” while 69 per cent said that if their child identified as transgender, they would affirm the new identity.
Skepticism returned, however, when it came to the issue of hormone therapy in minors; 63 per cent were against it, with opposition rising depending on how young the child was.
The new survey fits into a broader theme that has been showing up in Canadian polling data for at least the last five years: A broad consensus of Canadians want transgender Canadians to live lives of legal equality free from discrimination!!
….while at the same time being leery about issues such as biological men in women’s spaces, or gender surgery for minors.
As far back as 2016, Angus Reid found more than 80 per cent of Canadians supporting the addition of gender identity to the country’s anti-discrimination laws, but respondents were more skeptical of a push to have transgender people use washrooms and change rooms that accorded with their gender identity, rather than their biological sex.
Gender Identity & Biological Sex used as two distinctive terms. Seems like progress. Can’t fight if you don’t know what you’re fighting over.
Of respondents, just 35 per cent agreed with the sentiment — now enshrined via a latticework of federal and provincial laws — that “anyone who wishes can identify as a woman.”
About the same number (34 per cent) sided with the notion that women are only those “who were born with female genitalia.” (?)
Another 18 per cent were comfortable with the idea of men legally becoming women, but only if they changed their genitalia through surgery. (?)
(We’re getting into that weird ground again between gender and sex, where some clear definitions are needed to not cloud the issue)
These results suggest that a slim majority of Canadians (52 per cent) are not on board with a recent spate of Canadian legal reforms upholding the principle of gender self-ID; the notion that only a personal attestation is necessary for a Canadian to begin living as a member of a different gender.
Right up until the early 2010s, Canadians generally needed a doctor’s note or proof of sex-reassignment surgery to be legally recognized as a different gender.
But by 2017, a spate of tribunal decisions and policy updates had made self-ID the rule on everything from applying for a passport to playing for Team Canada.
Poll reveals Canadian trans policies that are out of step with public opinion — National Post
Canadians favour equality for trans people, but generally don't believe in gender self-identification, survey shows
The Angus Reid survey, which was released Sept. 19, also found a clear majority of Canadians opposed to the adoption of “gender neutral” terminology, particularly when it came to issues such as menstruation or childbirth. For instance, it is now standard for Canadian public health agencies to use the term “pregnant people” instead of “pregnant women.” Select health agencies have also adopted the term “chestfeeding” as a synonym for “breastfeeding.”
Angus Reid found that 67 per cent of respondents objected to this trend, agreeing with the statement that it “devalues the female identity in society.” Even among under-34 women — usually the group most accepting of gender-neutral language — 50 per cent were opposed.
“For these issues that focus specifically on female identity, motherhood, and birth, there is little appetite for gender-neutral language,” concluded pollsters.
A similar proportion were also opposed to a new trend of attached pronouns (ie: he/him, she/her) to one’s name in emails, social media posts or even in in-person introduction.
(While this is not mandatory among federal civil servants, it is encouraged and increasingly common, with the Department of National Defence even officially observing “International Pronouns Day” every Oct. 15)
Of Angus Reid respondents, 66 per cent disagreed with the statement “everyone should put their pronouns in their social media profiles.”
Meanwhile, that same survey identified several clear indicators that respondents were personally welcoming of trans identities among their social circle, and believed transgender Canadians faced disproportionate rates of discrimination!!
More than two thirds (71 per cent) said transgender Canadians “face a lot of discrimination in their daily lives,” while 69 per cent said that if their child identified as transgender, they would affirm the new identity.
Skepticism returned, however, when it came to the issue of hormone therapy in minors; 63 per cent were against it, with opposition rising depending on how young the child was.
The new survey fits into a broader theme that has been showing up in Canadian polling data for at least the last five years: A broad consensus of Canadians want transgender Canadians to live lives of legal equality free from discrimination!!
….while at the same time being leery about issues such as biological men in women’s spaces, or gender surgery for minors.
As far back as 2016, Angus Reid found more than 80 per cent of Canadians supporting the addition of gender identity to the country’s anti-discrimination laws, but respondents were more skeptical of a push to have transgender people use washrooms and change rooms that accorded with their gender identity, rather than their biological sex.
Gender Identity & Biological Sex used as two distinctive terms. Seems like progress. Can’t fight if you don’t know what you’re fighting over.
Did they poll anyone over 40?Gender Identity & Biological Sex used as two distinctive terms. Seems like progress. Can’t fight if you don’t know what you’re fighting over.
There are 2 genders and 71 sexual prefences.
Its fact that Autism plays a huge role.
Why isn't anyone pondering if the massive uptick is environmental? Plausible denial?
Last edited:
Funny how it's always "men can't self-identify as women" or something similar.
Absolutely rarely is there any comment that says "women can't self-identify as men".
It's almost as if being a woman is somehow... lesser... as if "identifying as a woman" is... bad...
Sure - except that's not exactly how it works, nor is it how they think it works.
Thus shows the ignorance still of Joe Random.
Proving that it's ALLLLLL about the penis.
ALL gender is Self ID. But try telling some people that and they flip their shit.
"Different gender" or ANY Gender.
Yeah, which is why trans was never as prevalent in society as it is now. BS like this.
But by 2017, a spate of tribunal decisions and policy updates had made self-ID the rule on everything from applying for a passport to playing for Team Canada.
Poll reveals Canadian trans policies that are out of step with public opinion — National Post
Canadians favour equality for trans people, but generally don't believe in gender self-identification, survey shows
It's not the ONLY thing that's needed... JFC...
Yes, because not all women can get pregnant. Sorry that actual respect of those who can't is somehow bad.
Again, it's a respect thing because some people don't like the term "breastfeeding". And NOT just trans men or non-binary people.
What is chestfeeding and why is it important?
In short: Chestfeeding is the process of feeding your baby milk from your chest. It's most often used by transgender and nonbinary parents.
www.healthline.com
"Some cisgender women (people whose gender identity aligns with what they were assigned at birth) might also use the term due to past trauma, so they prefer to use different language to discuss this part of their body."
(That said, I personally think it's dumb, but since the topic doesn't really concern me since I've never had a baby... no skin off my butt either way)
Unless you are someone who this affects - as in the person who would rather use the term chestfeeding instead of breastfeeding - get the fuck over yourself. There are lots of words out there used for things that people don't like. This is just another. Suck it up.
So they'd rather insult people who don't fit these molds exactly. Got'cha.
FFS - if you don't want to use pronouns tagged on your email or WTF ever, then DON'T.
JFC, no one is forcing you to put those things in...
I can see the point officially though - I mean, imagine coming across someone named Kelly Smith. That's it, that's all you see. So you email her and oops, it's not a her, but a him (cause men can be called Kelly). Or Quinn, or Skylar, or any other goddamn name...
Well that I can agree with. I mean, I don't, but then I don't give a flying fig what I'm called, to be honest. I've been called both so... whatever.
At least they recognized that bit of truth.
No shit.
Though I'm suspect about those who would affirm their kids identity. Easy to say but until that moment hits... yeah; no. Heard too many stories that say otherwise.
Okay, so no hormones for kids. Including for other medical issues like precocious puberty. Block it for one, block it for all.
And yet out of the other side of their mouths, you get shit like the protests on Wednesday...
And you wonder why Trans and other GLBTQIA+ people don't believe any of this.
And there you have it, folks, ignorance at it's best!
This "Survey" does nothing but prove Canadians are fucking idiots when it comes to trans issues, and believe bullshit, not actual facts.
As far back as 2016, Angus Reid found more than 80 per cent of Canadians supporting the addition of gender identity to the country’s anti-discrimination laws, but respondents were more skeptical of a push to have transgender people use washrooms and change rooms that accorded with their gender identity, rather than their biological sex.
Gender Identity & Biological Sex used as two distinctive terms. Seems like progress. Can’t fight if you don’t know what you’re fighting over.
Trans and other GLBTQIA+ people know what they're fighting for. It's the rest who have no goddamn clue, and don't want to even listen.