Oh, so it was male?What should we do with females who hurt other females in sports? Or is this only important because it was a male who hurt her?
Oh, so it was male?What should we do with females who hurt other females in sports? Or is this only important because it was a male who hurt her?
What should we do with females who hurt other females in sports? Or is this only important because it was a male who hurt her?
No. Let me nail you with a spike then we'll try a young adult female. It's all physics. You can't fuck with physics.Getting spiked by a volleyball will hurt regardless of who hits it.
As for this supposed video from this supposed player (yeah, obviously I'm doubtful of the story), I have questions that go with it all.
Like:
1. Was this player who hit the ball a trans person for sure?
2. If they were a trans woman, how long have they been in transition?
3. Were they taking blockers/estrogen? For how long?
4. What was their ability BEFORE the incident with this other player?
5. Was the player who got hit, ever hit with a ball before?
There's others but for now five should be enough, ya?
The difference is that being spiked by a female player only hurts the one spiked. Being spiked by a trans player hurts all upright, Gawd-fearin' Canadian Conservatives.Getting spiked by a volleyball will hurt regardless of who hits it.
As for this supposed video from this supposed player (yeah, obviously I'm doubtful of the story), I have questions that go with it all.
Dont encourage denying physics and biology. It's not good for anyone involved.The difference is that being spiked by a female player only hurts the one spiked. Being spiked by a trans player hurts all upright, Gawd-fearin' Canadian Conservatives.
And being spiked by the last bench-sitter on a losing high-school team who is trans hurts more than being spiked by an Olympic gold medalist who's female. That's physics, see.
Yes, and your "physics and biology" says EVERY person born male is stronger than ANY person born female.Dont encourage denying physics and biology. It's not good for anyone involved.
By size or by a flip of the coin?Yes, and your "physics and biology" says EVERY person born male is stronger than ANY person born female.
Which is horse shit. How's that for biology?
Yep. Which you misinterpret by saying that because males are on average bigger and stronger than females, that EVERY male should be at least eligible for "men's leagues" and NO woman should be.By size or by a flip of the coin?
Start here, "Sexual dimorphism".
It's discrimation that males in a zillion species are biologically bigger, stronger, and equipped differently than female?Yep. Which you misinterpret by saying that because males are on average bigger and stronger than females, that EVERY male should be at least eligible for "men's leagues" and NO woman should be.
Discrimination is the product of overgeneralization and fear.
Yes, and your "physics and biology" says EVERY person born male is stronger than ANY person born female.
Which is horse shit. How's that for biology?
Yes, and the error lies in assuming that the average applies to every individual case.It's discrimation that males in a zillion species are biologically bigger, stronger, and equipped differently than female?
Are you tiny?
Yep. See, except for a tiny percentage of outliers, humans are either male or female by biology.Oh, so it was male?
Yep, clearly you're confused. You need JEE-zuss in your life!I guess it was my imagination that I was stronger than my brother. Who knew!
Does that make you mechanically divergent from other males and leaning towards females attributes?Yes, and the error lies in assuming that the average applies to every individual case.
Nope, it makes you emotionally driven to deny the obvious. Some females are stronger, faster, and more physically capable than some males.Does that make you mechanically divergent from other males and leaning towards females attributes?
By size or mechanically?Nope, it makes you emotionally driven to deny the obvious. Some females are stronger, faster, and more physically capable than some males.
Sorry to hurt you.
If anything, the females who hurt other females in sports would likely not be as hurt as if it was a male. Think - biology!!What should we do with females who hurt other females in sports? Or is this only important because it was a male who hurt her?
There are always exceptions, but that’s generally not the rule of thumb.Nope, it makes you emotionally driven to deny the obvious. Some females are stronger, faster, and more physically capable than some males.
Sorry to hurt you.
They must never, EVER be allowed to compete against men!There are always exceptions, but that’s generally not the rule of thumb.
I had a former tenant who had been in Judo at that point for a couple of decades. His father was the coach for the provincial team for several decades, & this guy just grew up in that world.
He (& his wife-type at the time) rented my basement suite. One afternoon as they were passing through, I ended up with several members of the women’s Canadian national judo team (& a few of their husbands) on my deck. Those women were the exceptions to the rule of thumb, & not the rule of thumb.
Anyone one of them, at that level, could annihilate the average untrained male, but those ladies were not average women. At the time I had two blenders, & bananas were on sale, so we had daiquiris just because.