Are you sure? You never read the 13 posts detailing Zionist terrorism sponsored by the State of Israel? How did you miss that?
Go to the Hamas Attacks Israel thread. There are 13 lengthy and very detailed pages of State sponsored Zionist terrorism on Palestinians.
What on earth made you think there wasnt?
Zionists caused the Right-wing riots. Zionists were responsible for the gender controversy at the Olympic boxing. Zionists fixed the Venezuelan elections. Zionists ate my hamster. Most of these are real, public accusations. The war of words – and on words – is being won by those who would deliberately twist language in the cause of their own bigotry. The end point of this process is very disturbing indeed.
Students across the US are returning to their anti-Zionist activism and their British counterparts are preparing to do the same, all certain in the knowledge that by fighting Zionism they are fighting fascism and genocide. Some
Imams in London, the North East and the Midlands have meanwhile openly blamed recent far-Right riots on Zionists, which is to say Jews. And amid this progressive predisposition to seemingly support literally anyone opposed to Israel – a viewpoint disseminated on social media and not robustly challenged by authorities – the struggle for control of the language is being lost to extremists and the deluded.
A recent flyer for a Finchley Against Fascism event gets to the heart of the problem. The headline read: “Get fascists, racists, Nazis, Zionists & Islamophobes out of Finchley!” As Harry Hill would say, “You get the idea”. Zionists have been casually dropped in after Nazis because, well, they are the same thing. Apart from being ghoulishly provocative, this clearly states that anyone who believes in the state of Israel is evil.
The words Zionism and Zionist have been turned against the people and the country that conspiracy theorists would have you believe possesses an iron grip over the world’s economy and media. Well, some iron grip that turned out to be. As with the history of Israel and Palestine, the facts are apparently irrelevant.
Zionism is the desire to have a Jewish homeland (it doesn’t even denote what kind of homeland that would be). Can you imagine any other minority being thought of as Nazis for wanting self determination and security after a millennia of persecution?
Think about the widely held current assumptions about “Zionists” for a moment, on the basis that this applies to most Jewish people in the UK: they are warmongers, child killers and they support genocide.
How many Jewish people do you think “support” genocide or believe children suffering is no big deal? You’d have to work pretty hard to find a Jewish person in Britain who supports Benjamin Netanyahu’s government, even if they unequivocally support Israel’s right to defend itself. They are distraught about the suffering in Gaza and the majority would favour a secure, peaceful two-state solution (even though that looks a long way off). Yet they are also somehow complicit in mass murder. The sheer absurdity of this idea shows how far the discourse has collapsed from reason.
There’s nothing organic about the appropriation of the word ‘genocide’ – it’s a deliberate tactic to undermine Israel’s right to exist
www.telegraph.co.uk
A common accusation levelled at Israel by its opponents, and at the Jewish community more widely, is that the Holocaust has been weaponised to suppress criticism of its actions. The truth is the opposite.
The Holocaust was the final, dreadful point at which a Jewish state became a necessity. After centuries of oppression and persecution (the kind of experience that would normally afford limitless sympathy and support to other minorities), Jews could no longer be both an eternal minority and survive.
So when anti-Semites say “the Holocaust is always used as an excuse for Israel” they are correct. But to diminish the Holocaust in this way is the real, grotesque, weaponisation.
Anti-Israel activists and anti-Semites have also aligned themselves with the protestors who gathered against the far-Right during recent unrest on Britain’s streets. They are hiding in plain sight amid the anti-racist movement. In Leicester, an Imam proclaimed: “You have Zionists such as Tommy Robinson, paid by, supported by the fathers of all genocides, the Zionist regime, to perpetuate these ideas amongst them.”
What’s key here is not the reference to Robinson, but to Israel as the “father of all genocides”. The appropriation of the word “genocide” is not just casual or organic, but a deliberate tactic.
If the Holocaust made the creation of Israel possible, then accusing the state of perpetuating a genocide of its own delegitimises it in the eyes of the world. In other words, falsely using the word genocide is part of a conscious attempt to undermine Israel’s right to exist.
We celebrated when large numbers of people stood up to the far-Right, collectively patting ourselves on the back and saying “We’re not that kind of country after all”. However, as the dust settles on the actions of those egregious mobs, anti-Jewish activists continue to successfully equate the state of Israel, and any Jew who supports it, with fascism. That’s the agenda of the hard-Left (it always has been) and it’s finally working.
It’s working because Palestinian flags are waved proudly and anti-Israel chants reverberate loudly at anti-fascist marches. But an anti-fascist march full of anti-Semites is not an anti-fascist march. Those two things are a contradiction in terms.
The endgame of this effort to undercut the meaning of words is to undercut the justification for the existence of Israel. Doing so is not only in the interests of those who oppose it, but of those who promote ignorance and propaganda anywhere, from Moscow to Tehran and from New York to London.