2SLGBTQQIA+
- Thread starter B00Mer
- Start date
Leakage in the power steering box cancelled my projects .
You prove my point.
It is, because apparently you think these questions won't come up. And you don't seem to think about this situation at all and how it will affect not just "your" kid(s) but others.
If you don't want to be bothered with the topic, you can stop at any point.
No, just like they wouldn't if the kid of two gay parents wouldn't expect to have a het relationship explained.
But if the comment IS made, why SHOULD it be a need to discuss it at all - why can't having two moms or dad just be 'normal'? Shouldn't the teacher be allowed to just carry on? "My mom and mom and I," should have no more a reaction than "My mom, my dad and I". The point is, the way the bill is written, they WON'T be able to carry on, but would have to 'do something' about the kid mentioning their same sex parents; do something like "you can't talk about that" which will affect the kid negatively in so many ways that it's just crazy you don't get it.
THAT is the point.
But sure, I'll throw in this: a kid with a het parentage asks "Why does Johnny have two...?" What's wrong with the teacher saying "Well Johnny has two parents that are X because they love one another."
You are again assuming that there is some great detail going on into explaining 'alternate lifestyle' when that's not likely the case. And that answer is age appropriate to kindergardeners.
THAT is the issue.
Depends on the age of the "youngun". And you should know some kids won't take "just because" as a reason. And if the adult doesn't give a satisfactory reason, they will find it elsewhere, even if it's the wrong or twisted reason. You'd prefer that?
Which for the case of gender and 'sex', is all in "age appropriate" language too. Or do you think kindergardeners are getting right down to the mechanics of actual sexual acts like Boom thinks?
I mean if you don't trust teachers at all, why the fuck send kids to school then?
Oh for FS, it does not say that at all. Honestly.
The whole debate we are having is over 5-8 year olds and you are twisting the narrative to win your argument
You haven't read the law then.
Because while it doesn't explicitly SAY it, it also DOESN'T give an exclusion to situations like that either. And under the law, it DOES say that this situation COULD lead to the teacher getting into trouble or even being fired.
Not twisting the narrative at all. Just not so narrow minded as some people are, apparently, and think kids are oh so innocent and stupidly clueless they won't ask questions or be curious or anything else.
Let kids be kids let them stay pure and neutral, they are in for a rough ride after puberty, and the journey of self discovery in life
So long as they do exactly as the State wants...
HAHAHAHAHA.... you're funny.
Yep, and there are too many people (Boom, Dix, You) who want them to take that self discovery and deny it even happens and instead indoctrinate them into YOUR way of life and that only.
I'm not sure "live and let live," or as I like to put it "Mind your own damn business" is a "way of life."
You're an extremist. There isn't any chance of you "minding your own business".
“Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue.”
--Karl Hess
--Karl Hess