In a perfect world yes, but we don't live there do we?Why have sides? News is supposed to be facts not sensationalism or biased opinion.
In a perfect world yes, but we don't live there do we?Why have sides? News is supposed to be facts not sensationalism or biased opinion.
Cancel the crooked military industrial /pharma/ banker/money laundering/ derivative/ debt based currency complex, and the religious fanatics from all sides and we could get pretty closeIn a perfect world yes, but we don't live there do we?
Excellent question. Why pour taxpayer money into, or forego tax revenue from, businesses that are not viable? Probably a question worthy of its own thread. Or to bring it closer to the topic of this thread, how do you feel about financially healthy corporations accepting COVID relief funds while laying off employees, but still keeping up dividend payments to shareholders ?Why not allow publicly traded companies to sink or swim without government assistance?
I agree the system could be running a lot better, but realistically how do we push it into a different direction? If we could do it without violence in the streets that would be nice.cancel the crooked military industrial complex and the religious fanatics from all sides and we could get pretty close
pension funding...Excellent question. Why pour taxpayer money into, or forego tax revenue from, businesses that are not viable? Probably a question worthy of its own thread. Or to bring it closer to the topic of this thread, how do you feel about financially healthy corporations accepting COVID relief funds while laying off employees, but still keeping up dividend payments to shareholders ?
That does bring us back to the point of a need to be able to verify a sources integrity. A tool as powerful as the internet is not going to go unnoticed by those not weighed down by things like honesty and social responsibility, and the more money at stake the more sophisticated the attempts at manipulation.info on the internet ( assuming no cancel culture) has a level playing field - just look at the viral (meme vid podcast ) phenomenon.
The government is not viable. They scrutinize private industry and then dump billions into non productive public sector initiatives.Excellent question. Why pour taxpayer money into, or forego tax revenue from, businesses that are not viable? Probably a question worthy of its own thread. Or to bring it closer to the topic of this thread, how do you feel about financially healthy corporations accepting COVID relief funds while laying off employees, but still keeping up dividend payments to shareholders ?
...and foreign aid for political, money laundering and kick back purposesThe government is not viable. They scrutinize private industry and then dump billions into non productive public sector initiatives.
Maybe that's something that needs attention then. Like Alberta's oilsands. Premier Kenney has no problem holding his hand out to Ottawa for pipelines, or cutting cheques to help the struggling energy sector, if the sector is no longer viable shouldn't it be left to the mercy of the market?The government is not viable. They scrutinize private industry and then dump billions into non productive public sector initiatives.
Due diligence - or homework we used to call it: I blame school.That does bring us back to the point of a need to be able to verify a sources integrity. A tool as powerful as the internet is not going to go unnoticed by those not weighed down by things like honesty and social responsibility, and the more money at stake the more sophisticated the attempts at manipulation.
Sounds like Prem Watsa and his Canadian Press friends. Dirt bag billionaires.So tiny media outlets don’t deserve government funding because they only reach a small audience , but large publicly traded companies deserve government funding because they are Torontocentric and reach a large audience . Gotcha .
Fairfax Financial CEO Prem Watsa claims to champion anti-Black racism. So why is his company bankrolling bail insurance?Sounds like Prem Watsa and his Canadian Press friends. Dirt bag billionaires.
I like C.B.C. for the reliability of their news!I'm speaking hypothetically here, why not have a publicly funded news outlet on both sides of the political spectrum. The right is always crying to get rid of the CBC, why not level the playing field and give them an outlet they don't have to cry about ? You could even split CBC down the middle and have CBC Left and CBC Right ? It's stupid to think that every little backwater outlet should be in line for government funding, they're a business let them survive on their own. You'd need an outlet large enough to take on the load of being a national voice and that leaves "tiny media outlets" out of the running. A new right-leaning public outlet would have be completely funded by public funds. Being independent of pressure from shareholders is what public radio is all about, not having to be ratings whores and free to report as they will. The important thing is credibility. Lots of Conservatives criticize the CBC because of their editorial opinions, but they report the news truthfully. I'd be okay with one equally credible national outlet that leaned to the right. The key word there is credible.
Well JLM, some of us have been pretty careful digging up facts and from what I can see from the unavoidable youtube display of msm ( who ought to all be barred from there for fakenews(!!!), instead of all the truth tellers they have banned ), is that they are not on the same page as our facts are.I like C.B.C. for the reliability of their news!
Because of sidesIn a perfect world yes, but we don't live there do we?
It sure as hell can sustain itself if the scales are not being manipulated by a Gov. that wants to do away with itMaybe that's something that needs attention then. Like Alberta's oilsands. Premier Kenney has no problem holding his hand out to Ottawa for pipelines, or cutting cheques to help the struggling energy sector, if the sector is no longer viable shouldn't it be left to the mercy of the market?
Well, infrastructure is also needed when AND / OR / IF the price goes back upMaybe that's something that needs attention then. Like Alberta's oilsands. Premier Kenney has no problem holding his hand out to Ottawa for pipelines, or cutting cheques to help the struggling energy sector, if the sector is no longer viable shouldn't it be left to the mercy of the market?
I could burn my television but not live without CBC radio 1I like C.B.C. for the reliability of their news!