Gun Control is Completely Useless.
- Thread starter Colpy
- Start date
I'll buy that with long guns but not with the possession of AR-15 derivatives and Glocks, etc. No one in the country needs that stuff. Definitely, no one in the city does, either.
Boy's toys .... even amongst criminals.
You keep repeating that bullshit. We know you consider a lie as good as the truth if you can get someone to believe it. That is the lefty way. Now be a good little boi and show us the law that supports your lie.
Hand guns are, well handy in bush country for protection. Rifles are cumbersome to Cary and way to difficult to bring into play in a timely manner.
I see that in the creeks in Birkenhead lake , in the late summer I think they spawn earlier than the sockeye I see in the Birkenhead River . Those tend to spawn in October in my observation.
Not at all. It's those wankers in citizen's "militias" waiting in the shadows to wage war on the rest of us.
Rubbish. Nonsense. Handguns are handy in the bush for jerk-offs to jerk off with.
Try it some day. Go stop a bear with a hand gun.
Rotsa ruck.
https://www.foggymountain.com/hunting-guide-articles/handgun-bear-hunting/
Yep. Handguns work on bears, black bears especially. Grizzly, polar and Brown Bears? Well, better than throwing rocks or running.
Mind you, I think bear spray is at least as effective, but it isn't much good as a survival tool if you get hurt or lost.
Were I allowed to carry in the woods, I'd probably carry a .22 most of the time, or get some .38 shot cartridges for my .357 Magnum, and carry it.
Ridiculous.
It's an excuse to sling'em on your hip like Gary Cooper.
You approve of armed civilian militias, too like your little dog Bondo does?
I do approve of an armed citizenry.
Anyone with a knowledge of history, human nature, current events in the world, and has a lick of common sense does approve of an armed citizenry.
And carrying in the woods is a matter of convenience to me. In deer season I could carry a rifle and a single shot break action smooth bore pistol in .410 shotgun for grouse.
When hiking, I could dispense with lugging a rifle around, and carry a .22....or my .357.
Considering the fact I am allowed to carry a long gun with 10 times the effective range and 5 times the power of my .357 Magnum, why shouldn't I be able to carry a pistol in the woods?
That's what gun grabbers and freedom haters do not understand........if you are going to restrict my freedom, you need to have a rational reason.
There is no reason to ban handguns in the woods.
You are a potential criminal and enemy of this nation.
You need to be disarmed, criminal
And....you're a moron.
And perhaps crazy as well.
Your response to being shown incorrect in the handgun vs bear debate, and your response to someone politely disagreeing with you demonstrates that very well.
Have a nice day.