Canadians prefer Trump over trudeau

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
Only in your Alt-universe where everybody is stupid.


 

spilledthebeer

Executive Branch Member
Jan 26, 2017
9,296
4
36
Utter f**king bull shit!




In other news......................................


civil service union Hogs and Cdn media types are delighted...........................................................


that they have managed to so COMPLETELY CENSOR the opinions of ordinary Cdns!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
21,982
6,106
113
Twin Moose Creek
What in the HE double hockey sticks LL Is she dragging us into now?

Canada joins new German-France 'alliance' that doesn't include U.S.

OTTAWA — Canada has formally joined a German-French coalition aimed at saving the international world order from destruction by various world dictators and autocrats — and U.S. President Donald Trump.

The initiative is part of ongoing government efforts to shore up international co-operation at a time of waning American leadership and Trump's outspoken disdain of institutions created after the Second World War, including the G7, the World Trade Organization and the United Nations.
Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland offered Canada's support for the Alliance for Multilateralism during a meeting of G7 foreign ministers in Dinard, France earlier this month.
Japan also joined the new alliance during the meeting, and Freeland marked the moment on Twitter posting a photo of herself with Jean-Yves Le Drian, Heiko Mass and Taro Kono, her French, German and Japanese counterparts.
"Many of today's greatest challenges are global and they can only be solved when we work together. That is why Canada stands united with its German, French, and Japanese friends," Freeland said in the photo's caption.
Freeland also avoided any direct mention of the Trump administration, as has been her approach generally in her frequent critiques of the attacks on the world's multilateral order and the need to defend against them.
Le Drian and Maas appeared to dance around the fact that the United States was not a member when they formally unveiled the new alliance in early April at the United Nations.
France's envoy to Canada, however, connected the initiative to Trump in a recent interview.
"Mr. Trump doesn't like to value multilateralism," said Ambassador Kareen Rispal, referring to his withdrawal from the Paris climate change agreement, and his criticism of the UN and WTO.
"It sends the wrong message to the world if we think that because Mr. Trump is not in favour of multilateralism, it doesn't mean we — I mean countries like Canada, France, Germany and many others — are not still strong believers."
During testimony last week before the Senate foreign affairs committee, Freeland said that Canada joined the alliance overs concerns in the G7 over the growing threats posed by authoritarian regimes and their disinformation campaigns aimed and discrediting democracy and its institutions.
She commended "G7 partners" Germany, France and Japan, but again made no mention of the U.S.
"We agree that the greatest challenges of our time like climate change, income inequality, managing the power of global technology platforms, maintaining rules-based global trade and mass migration, are truly international challenges," Freeland said.
"We know in order to walk the walk in supporting the rules-based international order we need to show people how essential these institutions are in our daily lives."
Freeland cited Canada's participation in several other multilateral initiatives, including the Lima Group coalition on Venezuela, and ongoing support for international trade bodies and treaties.
On Monday, Canada imposed sanctions on another 43 people it says are implicated in the political and economic crisis in Venezuela.
The sanctions, now totalling 113, target high ranking officials in the regime of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, including regional governors and those undermining democratic institutions, said Global Affairs Canada.
The new sanctions coincided with Freeland joining her counterparts in Santiago, Chile at their 12th Lima Group meeting. The Western Hemisphere Coalition does not include the U.S., but is nonetheless aligned with the Trump administration in calling for Maduro's ouster.
Canada, its Lima Group allies, and the U.S. are among approximately 50 countries that say Maduro stole his country's election last year and is no longer the legitimate leader of Venezuela.
They instead recognize opposition leader Juan Guaido as the country's interim president, and have called on the Venezuelan military to back him.
Canada has excluded the U.S. from another multilateral initiative, aimed at reforming the WTO. In October, Canada hosted 13 of the WTO's more than 160 members in Ottawa for a meeting that is looking at ways to reform the world's trade referee.
On Monday, Freeland's office responded to the WTO's most recent decision in its ongoing softwood lumber dispute with the U.S. Last week, the WTO issued what was essentially a split decision that upheld a controversial U.S. practice known as "zeroing" to calculate anti-dumping duties on Canadian softwood.
"We welcome the recent WTO panel ruling that the United States did not follow the rules in calculating its anti-dumping duties on Canadian softwood lumber. The United States must bring its measures into conformity with its WTO obligations," Freeland said in a separate statement.
"Canada will be appealing the WTO panel’s separate findings on the U.S. practice of zeroing and its use of the differential pricing methodology. The WTO has ruled more than 20 times that zeroing, a method of calculating and applying artificially high and unfair duty rates, is inconsistent with WTO rules."

I'm thinking she should start running these controversial decisions past Canadians before getting us into another bind
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Trudeau's Private Island Trip with John Kerry, Court Orders to Reopen Probe on Aga Khan Vacation
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
21,982
6,106
113
Twin Moose Creek
I see she was not really going after more tariffs she was trying to get tariffs put back on because the Libs had to backpay a lot of the tariffs due to illegality

Canada exempts $110M more of U.S. imports from retaliatory tariffs

Earlier this week, the Finance Department quietly added $110 million worth of products and businesses to its list of exemptions from Canada's retaliatory tariffs on U.S. imports.
While this relief may protect jobs in Canada, it undermines political pressure the Trudeau government wants to keep on the Trump administration by making it less costly to continue to import certain American goods.
The new remissions appear in revised lists posted on Finance Canada's website. Finance Minister Bill Morneau's office said a cabinet order authorizing the additional refunds will be published in the coming weeks.
In last month's federal budget, officials revealed that $1.04 billion in net revenue has been collected from Canada's retaliatory tariffs so far.
At that point, Canada had approved up to $285 million in remissions through two previous orders in October and December.
This latest remission order means up to $395 million is now being refunded, and more U.S. imports will be exempt on arrival.

Morneau's spokesperson, Pierre-Olivier Herbert, said the revised list that came into force on April 15 results from the successful assessment of 30 recent requests for tariff relief. As a result of the new exemptions, 26 additional companies are eligible for remissions.
The government is also extending the expiry date of the period of eligibility for refunds from April 30 to June 30, for 33 companies with pre-existing contract obligations to buy steel or aluminum from the U.S.
"The extension of the time-limited remission provides relief for downstream manufacturers while they continue to undertake efforts to secure new Canadian sources of supply," Herbert said.
Canadian officials were hoping all the tariffs could have been lifted by now.
Instead, despite the signing of the revised North American trade agreement and its pending (but not imminent) ratification, the Trump administration shows little willingness to end the tariffs soon, despite business pressure on both sides of the border.

Retaliation ramping up
Last July, Canada retaliated against the U.S. for imposing a 25 per cent tariff on steel imports and a 10 per cent tariff on aluminum imports.
The federal government calculated the value of Canadian steel and aluminum shipments to the U.S. facing this tariff, and settled on a list of U.S. imports Canada would hit with retaliatory tariffs.
At the time, the federal government said it was matching the U.S. tariffs "dollar-for-dollar." But in the months that followed, these values haven't actually matched.
Last month, Canadian officials began warning they were considering stepping up this retaliation, likely adding more products in the coming months. In the weeks that followed, Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland confirmed that more retaliation is under examination.
Part of the reason Canada's retaliation hasn't hit as hard as intended is that businesses can apply for remissions that exempt products they need from paying the extra surtax. Specific criteria were set for these exemptions.
Businesses already locked into contracts that pre-dated May 31, 2018 — when the costly tariff action was announced — could get off the hook, as could others who demonstrate that no Canadian supplier was available for the specific goods they needed. The rules allowed companies facing "exceptionally challenging circumstances" to try to make their case for an exemption.
Many did, resulting in the nearly $400 million worth of refunds.
But smaller businesses complained to the Finance Department, as well as a House of Commons committee, that the effort, paperwork and expertise required to navigate the complicated application process for these remissions was beyond the means of companies that can't afford teams of accountants, lawyers or lobbyists to make their case to the government.

Canadian approvals not transparent
The U.S. Commerce Department publishes information about the applications for exclusions from its tariffs, making it possible for researchers to study what businesses from which countries are having the most success getting out from under the American levies.
A recent analysis found that about 40 per cent of Chinese steel imports are excluded from the U.S. tariffs, but only two per cent of Canadian steel imports to the U.S. successfully dodged the added cost.
There is no similar transparency for the Canadian remission process. What's posted online is only the product numbers approved for exemption, with the applicable dates. In some cases, specific business registration numbers (but no names) are listed — the only available hint at who's been successful in the application process.
CBC News has asked for more detail on which companies are getting refunds and in what amounts, but the government says this is commercially sensitive information it will not release.
Based on the total value of the remissions made available by the Finance Department, however, it's likely some companies are being refunded millions of dollars in tariffs they'd otherwise have to absorb as extra costs.
The finance minister's office told CBC News "the vast majority" of companies that have made successful applications for remissions are downstream manufacturers that depend on inputs that were targeted by Canada's retaliation list, as well as companies in the energy and construction sectors.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
In the matter of Trump vs. Trudeau, I guess Walter will have to agree it's about even Steven as they are now both confirmed to be chronic and habitual liars. :)
 

VIBC

Electoral Member
Mar 3, 2019
673
0
16
From the original post:
"Trudeau easily tops Trump among Canadian voters when it come to perceptions of intelligence, compassion, honesty and several other measures. But on economic policy, 53 per cent of Canadians approve of what Trump is doing versus 43 per cent of Canadians who approve of what Trudeau is doing."

What would this say about the way 53% of Canadians value honesty etc, versus economic advantage?
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
From the original post:
"Trudeau easily tops Trump among Canadian voters when it come to perceptions of intelligence, compassion, honesty and several other measures. But on economic policy, 53 per cent of Canadians approve of what Trump is doing versus 43 per cent of Canadians who approve of what Trudeau is doing."
What would this say about the way 53% of Canadians value honesty etc, versus economic advantage?
Fake news!

Most Canadians want to make America great, again!


... in Alberta, anyway.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
3
36
Economically 53% of Canadians approve of WHAT Trump is doing.

Who even knows what he's doing? He doesn't.
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
21,982
6,106
113
Twin Moose Creek
From the original post:
"Trudeau easily tops Trump among Canadian voters when it come to perceptions of intelligence, compassion, honesty and several other measures. But on economic policy, 53 per cent of Canadians approve of what Trump is doing versus 43 per cent of Canadians who approve of what Trudeau is doing."
What would this say about the way 53% of Canadians value honesty etc, versus economic advantage?

Trudeau has proven he has neither honesty nor an economic clue