Correct.Which is why Vancouver treats its sewage.
no irony here
Correct.Which is why Vancouver treats its sewage.
no irony here
Sewage discharge can travel a long way, but beyond 50 feet of the end of the pipe it is too diluted to cause any damage. Victoria's sewage eventually ends up out to the open sea. That is not the case for Vancouver.
From the Victoria Sewage Treatment Alliance
Facts Victoria Sewage Alliance
science has not proven that raw sewage harms the environment, has it?
Yes it has. In fish toxicity tests on Victoria's sewage, the fish died within 20 minutes. In identical tests on pulp mill effluent, fish routinely survive for more than 96 hours. These are just a few examples of the growing amount of independent scientific data (i.e. not conducted by a government agency biased against sewage treatment) that supports the need for treatment.
Victoria has discharged raw sewage since 1894; why change now?
In 1894, those responsible for Victoria's sewage did what they were first asked to do - get rid of it. In that era industry also discharged it's effluent untreated, but as our understanding of industrial effluent changed, so did society’s tolerance for pollution. We now understand that raw sewage includes many harmful and toxic chemicals, therefore, environmental laws no longer tolerate raw sewage discharges from municipalities.
no raw sewage is discharged by Victoria.
It goes through settling ponds and all solids are removed .
why do people who want to lie about oil pipelines need to lie about sewage?
no raw sewage is discharged by Victoria.
It goes through settling ponds and all solids are removed .
why do people who want to lie about oil pipelines need to lie about sewage?
Well, they catch a lot of fish around Victoria
Does that enter the argument under the heading of Pudding re Proof?
yes i do actually. When I worked in Sydney I signed a petition and donated money to create proper sewage treatment.
That was 2001?
So if a fish stays within a 50 foot radius of the outflow pipe it might die. There are two pipes, so that's two little spots in the bottom of Juan de Fuca that are unhealthy for marine life. Is it worth a billion dollars to get rid of those two spots? I don't think so.
Are you talking Australia or Cape Breton Island?
Sewage discharge can travel a long way, but beyond 50 feet of the end of the pipe it is too diluted to cause any damage. Victoria's sewage eventually ends up out to the open sea. That is not the case for Vancouver.
The fines, small particulate and especially anything water soluble will travel all over depending on the active currents/tides and these materials (like heavy metals) will contaminate huge volumes of the water they are exposed to... You are completely ignoring this very real and proven fact
Further, do you honestly believe that after +100 years of dumping raw sewage into these 2 locations, every minute of each and every day, that the sludge, sediments, heavy metals, chemical and all other components that make up human feces magically stays within this mythical 50' radius?
It doesn't stay within a 50 foot radius, but beyond that it is too diluted to cause harm.
If that's the case there would have been no reason for industry to be nailed for discharging into the oceans, lakes, rivers and subterranean water systems.
Depends what they are discharging and where they are discharging it. In Victoria's case it gets washed out to sea before it can accumulate to dangerous levels.