Especially pseudo-science.Yeah, that science shhit really sucks.
The left wants 17x more of your money.17x faster sounds like it should also be 17x more expensive.
Especially pseudo-science.Yeah, that science shhit really sucks.
The left wants 17x more of your money.17x faster sounds like it should also be 17x more expensive.
Still argumentum ad populam. Essentially saying "well, lots o' folk believe it," as if that's worth anything. That's why it's called a fallacy.I didn't say that I agreed with the idea, just that it is all over the place.
Another fallacy is called argumentum ad hominem. Basically, when somebody has shown that your argument is pig crap, you attack him personally in a desperate attempt to distract from the fact that your argument is pig crap. You've just demonstrated that.Anyway, anything that gives you an excuse to be snitty over your morning coffee like that is probably supplying a public service.
Still argumentum ad populam. Essentially saying "well, lots o' folk believe it," as if that's worth anything. That's why it's called a fallacy.
Another fallacy is called argumentum ad hominem. Basically, when somebody has shown that your argument is pig crap, you attack him personally in a desperate attempt to distract from the fact that your argument is pig crap. You've just demonstrated that.
Will you be showing us any other fallacies today? How bout the strawman, or the red herring, or the appeal to authority? Those are good ones.
No, that's ad hominem. You already did that. I'm trying to expand your toolbox of rubber hammers and toothless saws here, son!My, my ...and he hasn't even finished his Cheerios, yet ...
No, that's ad hominem. You already did that. I'm trying to expand your toolbox of rubber hammers and toothless saws here, son!
Only the greatest information and communication tool ever invented, by several orders of magnitude?It's only the Internet, Jake.
Only the greatest information and communication tool ever invented, by several orders of magnitude?
Precisely. Ideal tool for teaching logic to Canadians.
Ah, the false analogy. Good one.That's a bit like using the extensive library of Disney movies as a teaching tool:
"American history according to Fess Parker ..."
Of course. Nobody more environmentally sensitive than the military.Military Brass Back Tillerson, Mattis in Climate-Change Fighthttp://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/ar...ge/Articles/Template-Main&oref=www.google.com
Fun Facts:
1)Carbon dioxide progressively loses the ability to absorb heat as its concentration increases.
2)Man-made warming theory relies on water vapor, not carbon dioxide, to drive future warming.
3)Cloud formation contradicts this water vapor feedback.
4)Climate scientists have never solved this cloud problem.
5)Solar activity in the 20th Century increased to its highest levels in at least 2,000 years.
6)Every previous warm period over the past few thousands of years coincided with strong solar output.
Especially pseudo-science.
the latest news is CO2 IS up
and temperature is DOWN
yeah science sucks
I notice there are no more traffic jams in Vancouver as everyone is biking or taking transit .Even funner fact - none of that matters. People want green energy because it is clean and renewable and increasingly more affordable.
Well then, stop getting your "facts" from pseudo-science sites.
Tell that to Venus.
Naaah! I noticed that most of these "know better than thou" folks that preach the global warming mantra drive gas guzzlers....I notice there are no more traffic jams in Vancouver as everyone is biking or taking transit .
Even funner fact - none of that matters. People want green energy because it is clean and renewable and increasingly more affordable.
Well then, stop getting your "facts" from pseudo-science sites.
Tell that to Venus.
Yeah, that science shhit really sucks.
I notice there are no more traffic jams in Vancouver as everyone is biking or taking transit .
I notice there are no more traffic jams in Vancouver as everyone is biking or taking transit .
The sea came up 400 feet and two mile high glaciers melted since 12000 years ago
where the hell have we done 175 times that?
geeez!!!!
FAKE FREAKIN NEWS!!!!
The global warming science isn't science at all either
to the extent it doesn't rate as high as to even be called fake