2016 Presidential Campaign
- Thread starter Kreskin
- Start date
You're having trouble seeing the winners, neither of these meatbags will rule.
Each will enable the corporation to adjust you're life for maximum harmony with your carbon responsibilitys. Just make sure you vote, the counters are all certified by the state as good relible counters. get with the programe you fukking hippy!
You know I can't vote any more than you can, ya ole fart. But our lives will be just as phooked as the Yanks if either of those psychopaths get in.You're having trouble seeing the winners, neither of these meatbags will rule.
Each will enable the corporation to adjust you're life for maximum harmony with your carbon responsibilitys. Just make sure you vote, the counters are all certified by the state as good relible counters. get with the programe you fukking hippy!
Moving to Canada after the U.S. election? Here's where to go
By Jim Byers, Special to Postmedia Network
First posted: Wednesday, November 02, 2016 02:49 PM EDT
The presidential election polls in the U.S. are getting ever tighter, which means those folks who vowed to move to Canada if their preferred candidate doesn't win the race should be checking their Canadian maps and real estate listings.
With that in mind, the editors at Hotels.com have prepared a list of American cities and their counterparts in Canada, giving wannabe Canadians a better idea about what opportunities lie north of the border. Here are five of their suggestions on what Canadian locations are best suited to residents of big American cities.
TORONTO – Best for people from Chicago.
What Hotels.com says: “Poet Carl Sandburg once called Chicago the ‘Hog Butcher for the World.’ That nickname may sound familiar to anyone who knows Toronto as ‘Hogtown.’”
In Common: Both are situated on a Great Lake, with a tall tower that dominates the skyline. Both also have vast ranges of ethnic neighbourhoods and both cities love their baseball.
CALGARY – Optimal for folks from Houston.
What Hotels.com says: “Some people say Alberta is Canada’s version of Texas. It might be true since plenty of American oilmen and cowboys have helped shape Alberta’s history and culture.”
In Common: Both cities are home to major oil companies and are proud of their rodeos, plus some residents in both cities wear cowboy hats and boots as part of their everyday attire.
VANCOUVER – Ideal for San Franciscans.
What Hotels.com says: “These two Pacific Coast cities have enough in common that they might as well be twins who were separated at birth.”
In Common: Both cities are located on the water and are known for their expensive real estate and large, vibrant Chinatowns.
OTTAWA – Ideal for Washington D.C. residents.
What Hotels.com says: “If you’re not happy with America’s next president, but still want to be in a place where politics is part of the everyday fabric of the city, then this is the logical swap.”
In Common: Both cities are their nation’s capitals and boast world-class museums. Both are situated on a river, plus the Peace Tower and the Washington Monument have the same shape. Well, kind of.
MONTREAL – Best for New Yorkers.
What Hotels.com says: “There is only New York, but Montreal has the sort of flair, culture and joie de vivre that New Yorkers will immediately identify with.”
In Common: Central Park and Mount Royal Park both were designed by Frederick Law Olmsted, while New York City and Montreal are said to be one-and-two in the world for most restaurants per capita.
jim@jimbyerstravel.com
Moving to Canada after the U.S. election? Here's where to go | Canada | Travel |
By Jim Byers, Special to Postmedia Network
First posted: Wednesday, November 02, 2016 02:49 PM EDT
The presidential election polls in the U.S. are getting ever tighter, which means those folks who vowed to move to Canada if their preferred candidate doesn't win the race should be checking their Canadian maps and real estate listings.
With that in mind, the editors at Hotels.com have prepared a list of American cities and their counterparts in Canada, giving wannabe Canadians a better idea about what opportunities lie north of the border. Here are five of their suggestions on what Canadian locations are best suited to residents of big American cities.
TORONTO – Best for people from Chicago.
What Hotels.com says: “Poet Carl Sandburg once called Chicago the ‘Hog Butcher for the World.’ That nickname may sound familiar to anyone who knows Toronto as ‘Hogtown.’”
In Common: Both are situated on a Great Lake, with a tall tower that dominates the skyline. Both also have vast ranges of ethnic neighbourhoods and both cities love their baseball.
CALGARY – Optimal for folks from Houston.
What Hotels.com says: “Some people say Alberta is Canada’s version of Texas. It might be true since plenty of American oilmen and cowboys have helped shape Alberta’s history and culture.”
In Common: Both cities are home to major oil companies and are proud of their rodeos, plus some residents in both cities wear cowboy hats and boots as part of their everyday attire.
VANCOUVER – Ideal for San Franciscans.
What Hotels.com says: “These two Pacific Coast cities have enough in common that they might as well be twins who were separated at birth.”
In Common: Both cities are located on the water and are known for their expensive real estate and large, vibrant Chinatowns.
OTTAWA – Ideal for Washington D.C. residents.
What Hotels.com says: “If you’re not happy with America’s next president, but still want to be in a place where politics is part of the everyday fabric of the city, then this is the logical swap.”
In Common: Both cities are their nation’s capitals and boast world-class museums. Both are situated on a river, plus the Peace Tower and the Washington Monument have the same shape. Well, kind of.
MONTREAL – Best for New Yorkers.
What Hotels.com says: “There is only New York, but Montreal has the sort of flair, culture and joie de vivre that New Yorkers will immediately identify with.”
In Common: Central Park and Mount Royal Park both were designed by Frederick Law Olmsted, while New York City and Montreal are said to be one-and-two in the world for most restaurants per capita.
jim@jimbyerstravel.com
Moving to Canada after the U.S. election? Here's where to go | Canada | Travel |
FBI's Clinton Foundation investigation now 'a very high priority,' sources say
FBI agents have interviewed and re-interviewed multiple people on the foundation case, which is looking into possible pay for play interaction between then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation. The FBI's White Collar Crime Division is handling the investigation.
Even before the WikiLeaks dumps of alleged emails linked to the Clinton campaign, FBI agents had collected a great deal of evidence, law enforcement sources tell Fox News.
"There is an avalanche of new information coming in every day," one source told Fox News, who added some of the new information is coming from the WikiLeaks documents and new emails.
FBI agents are "actively and aggressively pursuing this case," and will be going back and interviewing the same people again, some for the third time, sources said.
Agents are also going through what Clinton and top aides have said in previous interviews and the FBI 302, documents agents use to report interviews they conduct, to make sure notes line up, according to sources.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016...s-say.amp.html
Quote:
Fox News Channel's Bret Baier reports the latest news about the Clinton Foundation investigation from two sources inside the FBI. He reveals five important new pieces of information in these two short clips:
1. The Clinton Foundation investigation is far more expansive than anybody has reported so far and has been going on for more than a year.
2. The laptops of Clinton aides Cherryl Mills and Heather Samuelson have not been destroyed, and agents are currently combing through them. The investigation has interviewed several people twice, and plans to interview some for a third time.
3. Agents have found emails believed to have originated on Hillary Clinton's secret server on Anthony Weiner's laptop. They say the emails are not duplicates and could potentially be classified in nature.
4. Sources within the FBI have told him that an indictment is "likely" in the case of pay-for-play at the Clinton Foundation, "barring some obstruction in some way" from the Justice Department.
5. FBI sources say with 99% accuracy that Hillary Clinton's server has been hacked by at least five foreign intelligence agencies, and that information had been taken from it.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...tion_case.html
bonus fun:
BREAKING BOMBSHELL: NYPD Blows Whistle on New Hillary Emails: Money Laundering, Sex Crimes with Children, Child Exploitation, Pay to Play, Perjury | True Pundit
Abel Danger: Insiders Threaten to Expose Hillary's Pedophile Sex Ring!!!
Justice Department official gave Clinton camp 'heads up' about testimony | Fox News
Hillary Clinton massaged Huma Abedin's shoulders at intimate Chappaqua get-together | Daily Mail Online
This would explain Boris Epshteyn on the campaign trail.
Trump and mobster Robert LiButti captured on video at 1988 WWE event.
Trump and mobster Robert LiButti captured on video at 1988 WWE event.
Last edited:
Most Americans are actually intelligent and resourceful people and that's why you should vote Hilary Clinton.
you left out criminally insane lesbian pedofile
"A third file I'm sure Hillary definitely DOES NOT want released was a file labeled "Intimate"… according to this NYPD insider, this file contained X-rated photos of Huma and Hillary with a TEENAGER.
NYPD detectives were sickened by what they saw, according to our insider, and they had threatened FBI field agents that they would leak this information, if the FBI did not "step up and take off the kid gloves". At that point, 13 of the FBI agents in NYC were also threatening to leak the information. "
http://www.abeldanger.net/2016/10/insiders-threaten-to-expose-hillarys.html#more
"A third file I'm sure Hillary definitely DOES NOT want released was a file labeled "Intimate"… according to this NYPD insider, this file contained X-rated photos of Huma and Hillary with a TEENAGER.
NYPD detectives were sickened by what they saw, according to our insider, and they had threatened FBI field agents that they would leak this information, if the FBI did not "step up and take off the kid gloves". At that point, 13 of the FBI agents in NYC were also threatening to leak the information. "
http://www.abeldanger.net/2016/10/insiders-threaten-to-expose-hillarys.html#more
Most Americans ain't got the brains to pound sand down a rat hole. Having failed to wise up, it's inevitable that they would fall for the latter-day rain man.
Clinton ain't much better. Her whole career makes it clear that being sneaky, secretive, suspicious, and playing fast and loose with the law and ethics aren't even choices for her, but fundamental to her nature.
So you want people to vote for someone that supports illegal actions. No wonder your favorite isn't getting much attention or support.
I'd settle for somebody who don't start declaring "enemies of the state" when he never quite managed to summon up the backbone to serve his country (much less my country).
NSA whistleblower: DNC hack was US intelligence and Hillary’s deleted emails are accesible
NSA whistleblower: DNC hack was US intelligence and Hillary’s deleted emails are accesible
of course they did
and of course they are
NSA whistleblower: DNC hack was US intelligence and Hillary’s deleted emails are accesible
of course they did
and of course they are
Well there it is
Hillary Clinton’s lead over Donald Trump unaffected by FBI announcement
Faith in humanity +1
Hillary Clinton’s lead over Donald Trump unaffected by FBI announcement
Faith in humanity +1
Maybe Clinton caught MF doing something he shouldn't have! What other reason would there be to support her?
The real question is why would anyone not support Hillary?
She has good policy and she's a good role model.
You contrast that with her opponent, Hitler, and the choice is pretty obvious.
She has good policy and she's a good role model.
You contrast that with her opponent, Hitler, and the choice is pretty obvious.
Same reason you support Trump. You're a low-information, not terribly bright "team player" who divides the world into "us" and "them," and unreservedly supports "us," regardless of how reprehensible, and hates "them," regardless of how laudable.
Campaigns spend at least as much money trying to decrease turnout from "them" as they spend trying to boost turnout from "us" or convince the undecided.
The foregoing refers, of course, to people who can vote. What Canadians got to do with it is beyond me. I recollect having a passing interest in your last election, but y'all's true-believer fury mystifies me.
