Conservative $2.3B surplus turns out to be a $3B deficit

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Because the Libs are lying.

Of course they are, at the very least exagerate exagerate exagerate, it's going to take the new government years to undo the Harper Harmtime and cost billions In the end the dark times will be forgotten.
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
Actually we are looking at two estimates neither of these numbers are cast in stone
Both sets of numbers are posturing preparing us for what is coming
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
1
36
I don't think anyone should be surprised by this. The CONS ran a string of six consecutive deficits but magically when they election was called, they laid claim to a surplus which even the Post/Sun couldn't disguise their cynicism at.....


The government will run a $1-billion deficit in the current fiscal year even if it uses all of its contingency fund, says a report released Wednesday by the Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Finance Minister Joe Oliver have repeatedly maintained the government will be back in the black this year. It has become a signature commitment from the Conservatives, a position the Prime Minister’s Office held to on Wednesday even with the budget watchdog’s new numbers.


Federal government facing $1-billion deficit: budget watchdog | Ottawa Citizen


The Conservatives are using the new report on the government’s healthy finances to sell the message that they are the only party that can be trusted to manage Canada’s fragile economy.

The government recently announced a $5-billion surplus for the first three months of the 2015-16 fiscal year (April to June), although about $2.1 billion of that came from the government’s onetime sale of its remaining shares in General Motors.

Harper defended his government’s record, while his political opponents said the balanced budget was the result of billions of dollars in cuts or program expenditures going unspent – known as “lapsed spending” — that they argued actually sank Canada into recession.


Federal surplus gives Harper a boost as debate on economy looms | Ottawa Citizen


 

Vbeacher

Electoral Member
Sep 9, 2013
651
36
28
Ottawa
Obviously.

But that only highlights the massive screwup in focusing on oil.

No one has ever been able to demonstrate that they DID focus on oil.

Well this is a surprise. This has never happened before where an incoming gubmint says they previous gubmint was cooking the books.

Actually, what the minister said was that the economic circumstances have worsened, which is hitting the government in the wallet.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
120,114
14,841
113
Low Earth Orbit
As the oil shock rolled through the country, business investment plummeted, shrinking the economy in the first half and dampening growth in the second half
what sort of business? Auto parts?
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Surpluses and deficits are just a matter of cooking the books. The Glibs simply cook the books to make the budget look smaller than their spending and the Cons did not cook enough.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Surpluses and deficits are just a matter of cooking the books. The Glibs simply cook the books to make the budget look smaller than their spending and the Cons did not cook enough.

It's all pure politics, apparently. Perhaps, the whole thing is just to complicted for any kind of accounting "truth" but I for one, feel like a swindled shareholder that's been given a fraudulent annual report and yes, no one party is any better or worse than the other. They are all swindlers.