A Serious Question For Conservative Supporters

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,379
4,047
113
Edmonton
Did he not say your opinion was not welcome here? Not that it is really welcome anywhere but still.

To the OP ...

I am a fiscal conservative but a social liberal (small l). I hate useless taxes and government waste (if you need definitions of either, please search "Wynn"). But I support gay marriage, freedom of choice and am not for the death penalty but am not against it enough to protest if it was implemented. In other hot button items, I support the idea that one might need id to vote in a general election and not be covered in head to toe with a wrap such that the voter could be anybody. I also support the fight against ISIS and support accepting refugees we can handle but performing proper security checks on all that come knocking.

The party I look for is one that will be doing best for me while not screwing others. The Conservatives are not perfect. They certainly could have been more open but overall I don't really think they have done a bad job. The tax reductions have been beneficial to me. Also, the Conservatives are not running on an abortion, death penalty or gay marriage platform so the gum flapping of libtards like Flossy really doesn't apply.

That being said, I do look at the NDP and the Lieberals for their proposals and look at how their government would be better for me and the country. The Lieberals sound nice: "Tax the rich, cut back tax on middle class", kill the child benefit and income splitting which is "benefiting the millionares". The problem is that their definition of rich is anybody making a HOUSEHOLD INCOME over $90k/year. They would tax these people. The millionaires no doubt have their millions in tax havens overseas and will not pay more tax.

The NDP I need to research more but from what I have read so far, it looks similar. But like I said, I have not had chance to research them yet.

I still consider myself undecided but am leaning Conservative and did vote Conservative in the last election. You asked, I answered. I have no intention of defending my thinking or getting into one of these back and forth things with you. Take this as my opinion and leave it at that.


I couldn't have said it better myself! Thank you!
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
As a fiscal conservative I want the best bang for the buck and I want balanced budgets. I see limited value in income splitting given the cost to tax payers.

As for taxing and spending like other parties, you're helping make my point. The Conservatives fiscal record is nothing to brag about.
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,379
4,047
113
Edmonton
I made up my mind weeks ago I will not be voting conservative
When Justin voted to pass C-51 I dropped the idea of voting for him



Which means you are either not voting or voting for a party who can't put a budget together if their lives depended on it! Huh!
That's truly unfortunate, but its a free country - you gotta love it!


JMHO
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
Which means you are either not voting or voting for a party who can't put a budget together if their lives depended on it! Huh!
That's truly unfortunate, but its a free country - you gotta love it!


JMHO
What do you know of the Green's budgeting skills?
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
The only people that are against income splitting are those two income families and single people....
That means those people that it doesn't benefit...
No hypocrisy there huh?
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
12,431
1,385
113
60
Alberta
There is a difference between conservative supporters and Conservative supporters.

People who consider themselves conservatives are generally douchebags.

People who consider themselves Conservatives are stupid douchebags.


In all seriousness, the term conservative is as nebulous as libertarian.

This would be why no one thinks much of your input.