Supreme Court dismisses Harper's appeal as Niqab ban deemed Unlawful
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
The niqab has nothing to do with religion. It is a cultural thing. There are many Muslims that have stated just that. Read the last article I posted, written by a Muslim woman that was born and grew up in Karchi.
I agree 100%. It's basically about subjugating the women. Look how women are treated over there after all.
Riiight. As opposed to forcing women to be subservient? Treating them like chattels? Yep, it's always nice to see women's rights take a step backwards in the name of religious/cultural "tolerance".
it was another made up law by the harper government,it should have never arrived at the courts in the first place,there are no laws and there should be no laws,once again the Harper government taking up resources and time in the court/justice system.I congratulate the Justice for making a great statement.
if you conservative lovers want,you can get in on some rallies here in Alberta,speak your mind,if there is not a rallie for your cause,then form one,you will get alot of support.I love watching rallies.
if you conservative lovers want,you can get in on some rallies here in Alberta,speak your mind,if there is not a rallie for your cause,then form one,you will get alot of support.I love watching rallies.
Yep, resort to the smart *** reply when you got nothin'. Now that you've made your pathetic attempt to deflect the issue, please enlighten us on how wonderful and tolerant we are for allowing the subjugation of women in the name of cultural/religious tolerance.
Annnnnnnnd go.
Pretty quick tap out. I understand. It's hard to justify misogyny without coming across as a total dick.
i am talking about law,not subjugation of women,i know nothing about that subject.
maybe you want to educate me, I am all ears.........go
i don't even know what subjugation of women means,but i will look it up.
There's no misogyny in letting someone speak with a thin piece of fabric on their face in a setting where there is no identity or security requirement.
Trying to make a law that stops someone from doing such a benign act is just petty, and there's not even one shred of doubt that the Conservatives will lose this fight.
From a legislative standpoint, it truly is the easiest call to make.
Do you want to make $10K? I'll pay you $10K to run past the X-ray machine, through the metal detector, and go sit in a courtroom and refuse to take off you toque when the baliff brings you into the courtroom from the holding cells.
If you walk with no charges, I give you 100 $100 bills.
Deal?
If you walk with no charges, I give you 100 $100 bills.
Deal?
So becoming a citizen of this country is not important enough to show your face, less important than getting a driver's license.
If someone needs a passport to get into this country...photograph and everything isn't it important to make sure that the right person is becoming a citizen...?
Or did that bump on the head prevents you from logical thinking?
If someone needs a passport to get into this country...photograph and everything isn't it important to make sure that the right person is becoming a citizen...?
Or did that bump on the head prevents you from logical thinking?
Try going into a Canadian Legion and get a drink with your hat on, unless you're willing to buy everybody a round....lol