Conservatives blame Media for Canada's failure to address Refugee Crisis

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
Most of us who will vote Conservative are quite willing to admit we do it for strictly personal reasons with no false altruistic motives...
In my case, I find that he kept his promises on several things....the long gun registry for one, and income splitting for seniors for another which saves well over $3,000. in taxes for my wife and I combined income.
I find it quite hypocritical of the leftard ideologues who post thread after thread for eg. the government not helping refugees, Harper hiding in a closet ect.ect.and just pretending to care about their fellow man when all they care about is their own private agenda....be it global warming, their hate for the Jews camouflaged as tying to help the middle east etc.
I will not mince words.........Godamned hypocrites all!
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Most of us who will vote Conservative are quite willing to admit we do it for strictly personal reasons with no false altruistic motives...
In my case, I find that he kept his promises on several things....the long gun registry for one, and income splitting for seniors for another which saves well over $3,000. in taxes for my wife and I combined income.
I find it quite hypocritical of the leftard ideologues who post thread after thread for eg. the government not helping refugees, Harper hiding in a closet ect.ect.and just pretending to care about their fellow man when all they care about is their own private agenda....be it global warming, their hate for the Jews camouflaged as tying to help the middle east etc.
I will not mince words.........Godamned hypocrites all!

I hear you, I have a couple of close relatives who hate Harper, they'll hear an incident on the news, that #1 they don't check the authenticity of and #2 they think a single or possibly pair of incidents define him. Harper at least has walked the walk, a walk of about 8 years and many miles. I laugh when I hear statement about him ignoring scientists etc. Who really knows what he's ignoring?
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66
stupid SJW hipsters occupying the beach



 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
The pics are about 1M shy of being the real number.
Canadian taxpayer.
Typical lefty always biting the hand that feeds him.
I doubt I'd be going hungry if we weren't bombing somebody all of the time.. (other than you guys making me gag occasionally)
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Which countries are taking in Syrian refugees?

ISRAEL is the only country sharing a border with Syria that has not taken in any Syrian refugees. Israel has extended humanitarian aid and medical treatment, including in Israeli hospitals, to more than 1,000 people injured in the fighting in Syria in recent years but has said it will not take in refugees. Israel and Syria do not have diplomatic relations.

EMIRATES and SAUDI ARABIA are increasingly criticized by rights organizations, which say the wealthy Persian Gulf countries have not offered to take in even one Syrian refugee. The nations have contributed to humanitarian aid, some generously.

Other European nations have been considerably less eager to embrace the beleaguered foreigners, most of whom are Muslim. HUNGARY has begun erecting a border fence, and Prime Minister Viktor Orban has drawn criticism for comments about the need to preserve Europe's Christian character.

Which countries are taking in Syrian refugees? - LA Times
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
The pics are about 1M shy of being the real number.

I doubt I'd be going hungry if we weren't bombing somebody all of the time.. (other than you guys making me gag occasionally)

guess getting a job and being a contributing member of society would be too much to ask of you?
 

Glacier

Electoral Member
Apr 24, 2015
360
0
16
Okanagan
According to the UN 47% of the "refugees" are neither Syrian, nor are they coming from Syria. And, contrary to media reports of them being "mostly women and children" 72% of them are Men.

On this Labor Day in the North American half of the free world, I have been asked why I haven't said more about the migrant tide engulfing the European half. The easiest response is that I've been saying the same stuff since 9/11, and at book length in America Alone, and the question has always remained the same - whether the west can muster the will to turn away from the suicidal delusions of multiculturalism. To judge from the appalling stance of Angela Merkel, the answer remains a resounding no.

Almost five years ago - February 9th 2011 - I wrote a piece here at SteynOnline called "Fortress Europe?" That was The Guardian's headline: all I did was add the question mark. The Guardian was reporting from the Greek-Turkish frontier - or "Europe's border", as a German member of the 175-strong Frontex security team described it:

  • In 2009 some 3,600 migrants managed to slip across the frontier not far from this market town; in 2010 that number shot up to 36,000, helping explain why Greece has become the favoured port of entry for 90% of illegals pouring into the EU.

    "They come at all hours of the night and day," said Orestiada's police chief, Giorgos Salamangas, in his icon-bedecked office. "And they're coming not just from the Middle East and Asia but all of Africa, places I have never heard of before."

The Guardian being The Guardian, they seemed entirely unaware that "Fortress Europe" was a rather odd kind of fortress. For one thing anyone can stroll into it:

  • The influx has shattered the rhythm of life in one of Greece's most isolated regions. Farmers in the main, the locals speak of the fear they have felt at suddenly encountering thousands of bedraggled men, women and children from the likes of Afghanistan and Iraq, Algeria and Morocco, India, Palestine, Congo and Somalia.

    "It's been an unbelievable caravan of humanity. I must have seen at least 10,000 of them pass," said Giorgos Liakides, who runs a little mini-market in Nea Vissa, the first village after the border. "You wake up and find them on your doorstep, and at night when you go to water the fields you find them hiding in the bushes. We understand their plight, we are human as well. But we're afraid. None of us ever used to lock our doors before; now we worry all the time."

    Mostly economic migrants, those who do get in readily hand themselves over to Greek police, eager to elicit the documents that will allow them to stay for up to 30 days in the EU member state.

    In theory, they are meant to be deported after that, but in practice many just blend into the back streets of Athens before attempting to sneak into another European country by train, boat or bus.

They're not "sneaking" any more. As I commented in my own column:

  • What does the future hold for Chief Salamangas and Giorgos Liakides? According to the UN, global population is supposed to peak at about nine billion in 2050, then level off and start to decline. If you're one of those eco-fetishists who think of humanity as a species, then that nine billion is the number to watch, up from six billion at the turn of the century. But, if you don't think of the world as one unified global parking lot, you're less interested in the big number and more in its constituent parts: On the road to that nine billion, almost all the increase in global population will come from Islam and sub-Saharan Africa ...countries which have done a cracking job of killing almost all human progress of the modern age. In the first decade of the 21st century, Niger, which is over 90 per cent Muslim, increased its population by almost half – from just over ten million to just over 15 million. In 2000, half a million of its children were estimated to be starving, but hey, that's no reason not to add a few million more. Its population is predicted to hit just under 100 million by the end of this century – in a country that can't feed a people one-tenth that size. Is it likely that an extra 90 million people will choose to stay within Niger?

That makes the question sound rather speculative, but it's not. In 1950, Europe (excluding Russia) had almost twice as many people as the whole of Africa. Now the positions have reversed - and then some. Africa is getting on for almost thrice the population of Europe (excluding Russia). And, as those ISIS-controlled Libyan ports have figured out, the Mediterranean is little more than a slightly wider Rio Grande. As I wrote in February 2011:

Sub-Saharan Africa will double its population between now and 2030. They're poor and getting poorer. Excepting South Africa, the Dark Continent's per capita income averaged $355 in 2004, but is expected to fall by almost 20 per cent to $290 by 2030. Good for the planet? Well, it depends how you think about it. A few years ago, a Unicef report found that more than one billion children in the developing world were suffering from the most basic "deprivations" – lack of food, lack of education, lack of rights. Yet by 2020 each of them – or at any rate the half who are girls – will have had an average of three children each. Who in turn will lack food and education and much else, and will be at higher risk of many genetic disorders. It would be asking an awful lot for untold millions of them to remain in the teeming, disease-ridden shanty megalopolises into which Africa's population is consolidating - rather than to, say, head for the lusher fields of Giorgos Liakides' village.

Here's the question for "Fortress Europe": What's to stop that vast "caravan of humanity" just walking in and taking it the way Robert Mugabe's thugs took any Zimbabwean farm that tickled their fancy? The Camp of the Saints is looking more prophetic every day.


Four-and-a-half years on, they're "walking in and taking it" - and Angela Merkel can't even see it.

Oh, but they're refugees! From the Syrian civil war!

According to the United Nations, 49 per cent are non-Syrian. As to whether they're refugees, well, usually, refugees flees as families. Yet here, from those UN statistics, is he breakdown of those "refugees":

  • 13 per cent children
    12 per cent women
    75 per cent men
That's not the demographic distribution of fleeing refugees, but of an invading army.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Which countries are taking in Syrian refugees?

ISRAEL is the only country sharing a border with Syria that has not taken in any Syrian refugees. Israel has extended humanitarian aid and medical treatment, including in Israeli hospitals, to more than 1,000 people injured in the fighting in Syria in recent years but has said it will not take in refugees. Israel and Syria do not have diplomatic relations.

EMIRATES and SAUDI ARABIA are increasingly criticized by rights organizations, which say the wealthy Persian Gulf countries have not offered to take in even one Syrian refugee. The nations have contributed to humanitarian aid, some generously.

Other European nations have been considerably less eager to embrace the beleaguered foreigners, most of whom are Muslim. HUNGARY has begun erecting a border fence, and Prime Minister Viktor Orban has drawn criticism for comments about the need to preserve Europe's Christian character.

Which countries are taking in Syrian refugees? - LA Times

A comment on the article...

And Canada? Hello?

In January, the Harper government said it would take in 10,000 Syrian refugees over three years, on top of 1,300 promised earlier. Mr. Harper’s party recently pledged to take in 10,000 more..

How did you manage to neglect Canada's involvement?
~ kimirving8


LMAO
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Stephen Harper says Canada will not airlift refugees without proper security screening - Politics - CBC News

"To help we must ensure we screen every potential refugee carefully. We have been clear that we are willing to take more people, but we must be sure we are helping the most vulnerable.

"We cannot open the floodgates and airlift tens of thousands of refugees out of a terrorist war zone without proper process. That is too great a risk for Canada," Harper said.

Canada must screen EVERY potential refugee.

LOLing
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Stephen Harper says Canada will not airlift refugees without proper security screening - Politics - CBC News

"To help we must ensure we screen every potential refugee carefully. We have been clear that we are willing to take more people, but we must be sure we are helping the most vulnerable.

"We cannot open the floodgates and airlift tens of thousands of refugees out of a terrorist war zone without proper process. That is too great a risk for Canada," Harper said.

Canada must screen EVERY potential refugee.

LOLing

Just one more example of Harper's wisdom and Sagacity!

Who the fuk are you to demand anything of me?

For starters try taxpayer and contributing member of society. :)