Why Americans should give thanks for the British Empire

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,906
1,905
113
A fight for its survival in a war that England started

Yeah. Alright.




Brits were driven into the English Channel at Dunkirk.
Dunkirk said more about German incompetency than British.


If not for the N. American navies England would have starved.
Come off it. You Yanks were busy mistaking whales for U-boats.

They could not even protect it's children as Brit parents sent thousands to the US and Canada to be safe.
The Children's Overseas Reception Board (CORB) evacuated 2,664 British children abroad to escape the bombing raids. This is in comparison to the over 5 MILLION children - including my grandparents - who were evacuated to other places in Britain, from the towns and cities to the relative safety of the countryside.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,164
14,240
113
Low Earth Orbit
Dutch did the same. Current Dutch royal Beatrice was sent here and to this day send sh-tloads of tulips to Canada in thanks.

F-cking Brits never did pay back loans or anything in gratitude to Canada.
 

Sons of Liberty

Walks on Water
Aug 24, 2010
1,284
0
36
Evil Empire
It did in WWII, when you consider the fact that, for most of the war, Britain had the largest navy on Earth - and had done for 200 years - and that, when America joined the conflict in 1941, it was very much Britain's junior partner, with less troops in the field than Britain until well into 1944.

No, you didn't. As a matter of fact, in most areas of production the US produced more than the entire British Empire and the Soviet Union combined.

In fact, for the first couple of years of so of America's involvement in the conflict, the number of American troops taking part in the conflict was just a tenth the number of British troops. America was Britain's junior partner throughout most of the war, yet I bet most Yanks aren't taught that.

That's because we aren't taught revisionist history, we have nothing to hide as opposed to you where you frantically prounce around trying to hide just about everything.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Dutch did the same. Current Dutch royal Beatrice was sent here and to this day send sh-tloads of tulips to Canada in thanks.

F-cking Brits never did pay back loans or anything in gratitude to Canada.


They were ashamed.
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
65
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
irony:



'Why We Should Give Thanks for the British Empire'




followed by,










... after Americans fought a war against and told the British monarchy to go to Hell






VERY ironic
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,164
14,240
113
Low Earth Orbit
Those who started the tradition were celebrating freedom from oppression and prosperity of the harvest without taxation.
 
Last edited:

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,906
1,905
113
No, you didn't.

Yes, we did. The Royal Navy was the largest in the world during WWII and had been for the last 200 years. The US only took over from the RN round about the end of the war or just after it, when Britain's devastated economy forced the Royal Navy to be downsized. This is something which is not even contentious because it as well known fact, just as the Moon is round and Man City are top of the league.

As a matter of fact, in most areas of production the US produced more than the entire British Empire and the Soviet Union combined.
Only eventually.

In 1940, Britain produced 15,049 aircraft, compared to 10,826 for Germany, 10,565 for the USSR and 6,086 for the USA. In the early stages of the conflict, such as during the Battle of Britain, Britain (which many people forget was an industrial superpower at the time) was producing almost as many aircraft as the USSR and USA COMBINED. This stunned the Krauts, who seriously underestimated the scale of British aircraft production during the Battle of Britain.

During WWII, Britain produced 131,549 aircraft and the USA built 297,199. At the time, the USA had three times the population of Britain yet produced just twice the number of aircraft. When taking population into account and the number of workers in each country, Britain was far more productive than the US.


That's because we aren't taught revisionist history
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
The US and Canada supplied brittain with pretty much everything.

Without N. America, England would have starved.

The U-Boats kept Churchill awake at night... not the Luftwaffe.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
It did in WWII, when you consider the fact that, for most of the war, Britain had the largest navy on Earth - and had done for 200 years - and that, when America joined the conflict in 1941, it was very much Britain's junior partner, with less troops in the field than Britain until well into 1944.

In fact, for the first couple of years of so of America's involvement in the conflict, the number of American troops taking part in the conflict was just a tenth the number of British troops. America was Britain's junior partner throughout most of the war, yet I bet most Yanks aren't taught that.
.... and yet the USA and a few others had to save Brit butts. Go figure, huh?

Ooops. Had to come back and fix this
 
Last edited:

Sons of Liberty

Walks on Water
Aug 24, 2010
1,284
0
36
Evil Empire
Sons of Liberty said:
Quote: Originally Posted by Blackleaf
Have you got any evidence from your rather dubious assertion?
Americans Will Always Do the Right Thing — After Exhausting All the Alternatives | Quote Investigator

Before you tell me the site isn't credible, cite the quote from Winston Churchill from a credible source and I will put my foot in my mouth.

EagleSmack, BL believes in myths and stories that complete his imaginary world of the British Empire.

You are my sunshine, my only sunshine, you make me happy, when skies are gray.....:p

Yes, we did. The Royal Navy was the largest in the world during WWII and had been for the last 200 years. The US only took over from the RN round about the end of the war or just after it, when Britain's devastated economy forced the Royal Navy to be downsized. This is something which is not even contentious because it as well known fact, just as the Moon is round and Man City are top of the league.

The Japanese Imperial Navy was the largest and most powerful at the onset of WWII

Only eventually.

In 1940, Britain produced 15,049 aircraft, compared to 10,826 for Germany, 10,565 for the USSR and 6,086 for the USA. In the early stages of the conflict, such as during the Battle of Britain, Britain (which many people forget was an industrial superpower at the time) was producing almost as many aircraft as the USSR and USA COMBINED. This stunned the Krauts, who seriously underestimated the scale of British aircraft production during the Battle of Britain.

During WWII, Britain produced 131,549 aircraft and the USA built 297,199. At the time, the USA had three times the population of Britain yet produced just twice the number of aircraft. When taking population into account and the number of workers in each country, Britain was far more productive than the US.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_production_during_World_War_II#Air_forces



You can laugh all you want, it's a normal reaction to shame.