North Korea knocked offline

Scooby

Electoral Member
Mar 22, 2012
403
0
16
Alberta
I think this is all a publicity stunt, secretly staged by Sony, to make a pile of money off a mediocre movie.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
I think this is all a publicity stunt, secretly staged by Sony, to make a pile of money off a mediocre movie.




Having to pay off Sharpton and his gang of thieves, and going forward giving them a say on what movies should be or should not be made was a pretty expensive publicity stunt.
 

WLDB

Senate Member
Jun 24, 2011
6,182
0
36
Ottawa
I think this is all a publicity stunt, secretly staged by Sony, to make a pile of money off a mediocre movie.

Such a stunt would cost quite a few times what the movies budget is, what would be the point? The movie was relatively low budget by Hollywood standards. It wouldnt take much to make a profit off of it. Particularly not with those involved. Even when Rogan and Franco put out sh*tty movies, they tend to turn a large profit.
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
212
63
In the bush near Sudbury
How much difference would there be in a big-budget box office flop? For a flick that already has all the potential of a low-bucks dud, it sure is getting a lot of free advertising
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Ahh, wait for the next play, should be a eye-opener


Sharpton said as much... "the jury is still out"... he said about Amy Pascal (i.e. Sony)


He wants a piece of Sony's action. This wasn't simply a one check incident it would appear.

How much difference would there be in a big-budget box office flop? For a flick that already has all the potential of a low-bucks dud, it sure is getting a lot of free advertising


Will they even show it in theaters?


Does Wal-Mart, Best Buy, and Amazon get hacked if they sell DVDs of it?
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
76
Eagle Creek
How much difference would there be in a big-budget box office flop? For a flick that already has all the potential of a low-bucks dud, it sure is getting a lot of free advertising

They are saving Big Time on their advertising budget. After all this publicity, I'm sure people who formerly would have given it a pass, will see it now simply out of curiosity. I know I will.
 

BaalsTears

Senate Member
Jan 25, 2011
5,732
0
36
Santa Cruz, California
Not so much anymore. Kim Jong Un purged most of the contacts China had in the government since he has been in power. Lately even they havent been on good terms.

The DPRK military is a separate center of power. Chinese influence is strong in the officer corps of the Korean People's Army. Kim loathes the Chinese, but can't do without them. Kim would like to have several great powers supplying him with sustenance, but can't get the Americans to play the game and pony up. Chinese control of the resources of North Korea is pervasive. Kim doesn't like that, but what is he to do?
 

BaalsTears

Senate Member
Jan 25, 2011
5,732
0
36
Santa Cruz, California
Maybe as a christmas gift to the world, he'll just up and have a heart attack? This can't be doing his blood pressure any good.

Taking down the internet of another country sounds like terrorism unless there is a lawful basis, e.g., a declaration of war. Obama is just another terrorist on the same level as Kim Jong Un and Osama bin Laden. Obama should be tried before the International Court of Justice, convicted, and executed.

What dictators do best. Purge the elements they dont like whether they pose a threat or not.

If he purges the officer corps of the KPA, there is a risk that Chinese airborne troops will rain on his parade.
 

WLDB

Senate Member
Jun 24, 2011
6,182
0
36
Ottawa
Taking down the internet of another country sounds like terrorism unless there is a lawful basis, e.g., a declaration of war.

Technically, the Korean war never ended. So there you have it.

If he purges the officer corps of the KPA, there is a risk that Chinese airborne troops will rain on his parade.

Is there? I dont think the Chinese care enough. If they take the country they have to deal with its massive problems. Better to just ignore it.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Technically, the Korean war never ended. So there you have it.



Is there? I dont think the Chinese care enough. If they take the country they have to deal with its massive problems. Better to just ignore it.

And whose kept that little war simmering on the back burner for six decades?
 

BaalsTears

Senate Member
Jan 25, 2011
5,732
0
36
Santa Cruz, California
Technically, the Korean war never ended. So there you have it....

The Armistice is still in effect. Violation of the armistice would be a transgression of international law.



Is there? I dont think the Chinese care enough. If they take the country they have to deal with its massive problems. Better to just ignore it.

The two Chinese provinces bordering the DPRK might be flooded with refugees if the status quo is altered. That would transfer massive problems from the DPRK to China.

And whose kept that little war simmering on the back burner for six decades?

Obama.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
What dictators do best. Purge the elements they dont like whether they pose a threat or not.

You would be interested in the decade long purge of the USAs officer corp. Also by dictators.


The Armistice is still in effect. Violation of the armistice would be a transgression of international law.





The two Chinese provinces bordering the DPRK might be flooded with refugees if the status quo is altered. That would transfer massive problems from the DPRK to China.



Obama.

Obama does nothing but golf and help his wife thing screw up school food.
 

WLDB

Senate Member
Jun 24, 2011
6,182
0
36
Ottawa
The Armistice is still in effect. Violation of the armistice would be a transgression of international law.

The state of war still exists. Cease fires end all the time. I doubt the armistice says anything at all about the internet or 'cyber warfare' in general.

This is all also assuming it was the US government that did it.

The two Chinese provinces bordering the DPRK might be flooded with refugees if the status quo is altered. That would transfer massive problems from the DPRK to China.

This is true. That sort of thing may be inevitable though. May not happen for another generation or more but eventually things will have to change in North Korea. When they do those refugees will still be an issue for China.

And whose kept that little war simmering on the back burner for six decades?

Korea as a whole.