Death knell for AGW
- Thread starter Walter
- Start date
The warming is hiding in the bottom of the ocean. Someday it will pop out and say BOO!
The NO CARBON TAX Climate Sceptics Blog: The warming is hiding in the bottom of the ocean. Someday it will pop out and say BOO!
Discussion between radio 2GB’s Alan Jones and Lord Christopher Monckton.The 2007 IPCC report said that the earth was warming at 0.2ºC per decade, the latest report reduces that figure to 0.12º. We’re contributing $100 billion a year by 2020 to the UN green climate fund, in the three years to June 30 we have contributed $600 million! “and the electorate would not have a clue that we were stumping up this money.Lord Monckton again points out the fraud of theCook et al paper. Fraudster Peter Gleik is on the board of the journal.Ross McKittrick pointed out how much theyhave got wrong in the past.Alan: Carbon dioxide is warming the planet but it won’t be evident in the temperatures, it is hiding somewhere in the bowels of the ocean.LCM: This is the extraordinary thing. They are saying that it somehow managed to go from the atmosphere into the ocean. Not into the bit of the ocean that touches the atmosphere, no it missed that out and it’s gone down and hidden in the bottom of the ocean where we can’t measure it. And one day it’s going to come out and say boo! I mean you couldn’t make it up well, yes you could, because that’s exactly what they’ve done. * * * * * * * * * * * How can people, whether a trained scientist or just an ordinary member of the planet’s population believe this drivel?Hear the conversation:Alan Jones - Lord Christopher Monckton | 2GB
The warming is hiding in the bottom of the ocean. Someday it will pop out and say BOO! | Climate Depot
The NO CARBON TAX Climate Sceptics Blog: The warming is hiding in the bottom of the ocean. Someday it will pop out and say BOO!
Discussion between radio 2GB’s Alan Jones and Lord Christopher Monckton.The 2007 IPCC report said that the earth was warming at 0.2ºC per decade, the latest report reduces that figure to 0.12º. We’re contributing $100 billion a year by 2020 to the UN green climate fund, in the three years to June 30 we have contributed $600 million! “and the electorate would not have a clue that we were stumping up this money.Lord Monckton again points out the fraud of theCook et al paper. Fraudster Peter Gleik is on the board of the journal.Ross McKittrick pointed out how much theyhave got wrong in the past.Alan: Carbon dioxide is warming the planet but it won’t be evident in the temperatures, it is hiding somewhere in the bowels of the ocean.LCM: This is the extraordinary thing. They are saying that it somehow managed to go from the atmosphere into the ocean. Not into the bit of the ocean that touches the atmosphere, no it missed that out and it’s gone down and hidden in the bottom of the ocean where we can’t measure it. And one day it’s going to come out and say boo! I mean you couldn’t make it up well, yes you could, because that’s exactly what they’ve done. * * * * * * * * * * * How can people, whether a trained scientist or just an ordinary member of the planet’s population believe this drivel?Hear the conversation:Alan Jones - Lord Christopher Monckton | 2GB
The warming is hiding in the bottom of the ocean. Someday it will pop out and say BOO! | Climate Depot
via sda
Teachable moments
So, if last years drought in the corn belt was 'a teachable moment' on the effects of global warming, then what is this years bumper crop?
Oh, I know, 'weather'.
Iowa scientists: Drought a sign of climate change
Farmers surprised by corn yields
Teachable moments
So, if last years drought in the corn belt was 'a teachable moment' on the effects of global warming, then what is this years bumper crop?
Oh, I know, 'weather'.
Iowa scientists: Drought a sign of climate change
Farmers surprised by corn yields
Drought is caused by cooling oceans and GMO cultivars have taken some major leaps in yield this crop year.
More food to burn as biofuel and artery clogging deep fryer oil.
More food to burn as biofuel and artery clogging deep fryer oil.
via sda:
The Sound Of Settled Science
90 climate models vs reality.
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpr...90-models-global-tsfc-vs-obs1.jpg?w=640&h=576
The Sound Of Settled Science
90 climate models vs reality.
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpr...90-models-global-tsfc-vs-obs1.jpg?w=640&h=576
That depends on who does the count don't it?
via sda:
The Sound Of Settled Science
90 climate models vs reality.
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpr...90-models-global-tsfc-vs-obs1.jpg?w=640&h=576
Dr. Roy Spencer (who posted this) isn't exactly a skeptcis best friend. He thinks, for example, that people who deny the existence of the Greenhouse Effect (which is most of the so-called skeptcis on this site) are crackpots.
He's one of my favourite skeptics, actually. He has a pretty solid understanding of the science and brings it to bear quite well.He makes his claims consistently (as opposed to Anthony Watt, who runs Watts Up With That, who changes his degree of skepticism depending ont he weather). He's an Intelligent Design guy, though--epic fail there.
an·ec·do·tal
/ˌanikˈdōtl/
Adjective
anecdotic - anecdotical
/ˌanikˈdōtl/
Adjective
- (of an account) Not necessarily true or reliable, because based on personal accounts rather than facts or research.
- Characterized by or fond of telling anecdotes.
anecdotic - anecdotical
There seem to be more and more news outlets calling the IPCC out for the shysters they are.
The True Global Warming Crisis: The Fibs Underlying The Theory
As Professor of Meteorology Dr. Richard Lindzen at MIT’s Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences observed, “The latest IPCC report truly sank to the level of hilarious incoherence – it is quite amazing to see the contortions the IPCC has to go through in order to keep the international climate agenda going.” The banner claim of this 2013 Summary for Policymakers (AR5) release is that “Human influence is extremely likely to be dominant cause of observed warming since the middle of the last century.”
This “extremely likely” was ratcheted up from “very likely” they claimed in their previous 2007 report. At the same time, the IPCC actually admitted that its 2007 report estimate of greenhouse gas influence had been significantly exaggerated. One can only wonder how they have become more confident that at least more than half of the temperature rise since the mid-20th century has been caused by greenhouse gas emissions, when at the same time they are less certain about climate sensitivity to CO2.
more
The True Global Warming Crisis: The Fibs Underlying The Theory - Forbes
The True Global Warming Crisis: The Fibs Underlying The Theory
As Professor of Meteorology Dr. Richard Lindzen at MIT’s Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences observed, “The latest IPCC report truly sank to the level of hilarious incoherence – it is quite amazing to see the contortions the IPCC has to go through in order to keep the international climate agenda going.” The banner claim of this 2013 Summary for Policymakers (AR5) release is that “Human influence is extremely likely to be dominant cause of observed warming since the middle of the last century.”
This “extremely likely” was ratcheted up from “very likely” they claimed in their previous 2007 report. At the same time, the IPCC actually admitted that its 2007 report estimate of greenhouse gas influence had been significantly exaggerated. One can only wonder how they have become more confident that at least more than half of the temperature rise since the mid-20th century has been caused by greenhouse gas emissions, when at the same time they are less certain about climate sensitivity to CO2.
more
The True Global Warming Crisis: The Fibs Underlying The Theory - Forbes
"Climatology Sees One Of The Greatest Scientific Reversals Of All Time – The Rise And Fall Of The Hockey Stick Charts"
"An examination of the five IPCC reports published thus far reveals a remarkable scientific reversal. What follows is the evolution of the 1000-year temperature curve: from double hump (1990) - to hockey stick 2001) – and back again to double hump (2013)."
Climatology Sees One Of The Greatest Scientific Reversals Of All Time – The Rise And Fall Of The Hockey Stick Charts
"An examination of the five IPCC reports published thus far reveals a remarkable scientific reversal. What follows is the evolution of the 1000-year temperature curve: from double hump (1990) - to hockey stick 2001) – and back again to double hump (2013)."
Climatology Sees One Of The Greatest Scientific Reversals Of All Time – The Rise And Fall Of The Hockey Stick Charts
New study finds the natural Pacific Decadal Oscillation controls tornado activity, not CO2
A new study finds that the severity and locations of tornadoes is strongly influenced by the natural Pacific Decadal Oscillation, with more severe tornadoes occurring during the warm phase and fewer during the cold phase. The cold phase of the ~60-year Pacific Decadal Oscillation [PDO] started in the year 2000, and would explain why the US is currently experiencing the fewest tornadoes on record, and why higher CO2 is correlated with fewer severe tornadoes.
here
THE HOCKEY SCHTICK: New study finds the natural Pacific Decadal Oscillation controls tornado activity, not CO2
A new study finds that the severity and locations of tornadoes is strongly influenced by the natural Pacific Decadal Oscillation, with more severe tornadoes occurring during the warm phase and fewer during the cold phase. The cold phase of the ~60-year Pacific Decadal Oscillation [PDO] started in the year 2000, and would explain why the US is currently experiencing the fewest tornadoes on record, and why higher CO2 is correlated with fewer severe tornadoes.
here
THE HOCKEY SCHTICK: New study finds the natural Pacific Decadal Oscillation controls tornado activity, not CO2
Atlantic hurricane season quietest in 45 years, experts say
Yahoo News Canada - Latest News & Headlines
Yahoo News Canada - Latest News & Headlines
What do experts know?Atlantic hurricane season quietest in 45 years, experts say
Yahoo News Canada - Latest News & Headlines
The IPCC Southern Hemisphere Reconstructions
A question for readers: which of the following proxies are used to reconstruct past Southern Hemisphere temperature in the IPCC’s graphic (Figure 5.7b) showing SH reconstructions:
1. Graybill’s California strip-bark bristlecone chronologies
2. upside down and contaminated Finnish lake sediments
3. European instrumental temperature data
4. Antarctic ice core d18O isotope data covering the medieval period
seeing Jesus in a piece of toast
The IPCC Southern Hemisphere Reconstructions « Climate Audit
A question for readers: which of the following proxies are used to reconstruct past Southern Hemisphere temperature in the IPCC’s graphic (Figure 5.7b) showing SH reconstructions:
1. Graybill’s California strip-bark bristlecone chronologies
2. upside down and contaminated Finnish lake sediments
3. European instrumental temperature data
4. Antarctic ice core d18O isotope data covering the medieval period
seeing Jesus in a piece of toast
The IPCC Southern Hemisphere Reconstructions « Climate Audit
Being well paid and having a thriving economy creates CO2?
http://www.calgaryherald.com/business/energy-resources/Ewart+wealth+comes+price/9095627/story.html?__lsa=0bd8-dec8
Interesting. Oh wait....a few lines down.
No **** Sherlock. If it ever gets -40C in Botswana. I'd wager Botswanans burning elephant sh*t and emitting elephant CO2 will completely kill all the life on the planet except for plants and algae.
Hooray for algae!
http://www.calgaryherald.com/business/energy-resources/Ewart+wealth+comes+price/9095627/story.html?__lsa=0bd8-dec8
10%? The exact amount that will be pumped underground from coal fired power plants into oil fields to produce more oil. Hooray for SaskPower!
Interesting. Oh wait....a few lines down.
No **** Sherlock. If it ever gets -40C in Botswana. I'd wager Botswanans burning elephant sh*t and emitting elephant CO2 will completely kill all the life on the planet except for plants and algae.
Hooray for algae!
The AGW con industry has continued its tactic of releasing completely misleading and incendicary public provocations.. in slick, methodical rollouts intended to maintain a high level of anxiety and confusion in the public mind.
The latest is the 'bulletin' reported on the major news casts of the last couple of days... that the amount of CO2 has reached 393 ppm in the atmosphere.. supposedly 50 beyond the ppm that ensures catastrophic Global Warming (completely without scientific verification.. and disproven by the stalling and reversal of warming trends that occurred at the middle of the last century). And, of course, the UN is the chief fear mongerer.. as in this.
http://www.ctvnews.ca/sci-tech/carbon-dioxide-pollution-levels-at-record-high-un-1.1530344
The 393 ppm is actually a relatively stable figure that goes through fluctuation due to natural events independent of human activity.. and restabilizes as photosynthesis and other processes restores a balance.
What is left out is that the human contribution to this ppm in the atmosphere figure is 6 of 720 billion tons, less than 1%. These people are a disgrace.. fabricating a political agenda on a pseudo science.. implicitly tied to radical agendas of depopulation.. of which the UN is the major proponent.
Don't believe anything they say.
Reference
The latest is the 'bulletin' reported on the major news casts of the last couple of days... that the amount of CO2 has reached 393 ppm in the atmosphere.. supposedly 50 beyond the ppm that ensures catastrophic Global Warming (completely without scientific verification.. and disproven by the stalling and reversal of warming trends that occurred at the middle of the last century). And, of course, the UN is the chief fear mongerer.. as in this.
http://www.ctvnews.ca/sci-tech/carbon-dioxide-pollution-levels-at-record-high-un-1.1530344
The 393 ppm is actually a relatively stable figure that goes through fluctuation due to natural events independent of human activity.. and restabilizes as photosynthesis and other processes restores a balance.
What is left out is that the human contribution to this ppm in the atmosphere figure is 6 of 720 billion tons, less than 1%. These people are a disgrace.. fabricating a political agenda on a pseudo science.. implicitly tied to radical agendas of depopulation.. of which the UN is the major proponent.
Don't believe anything they say.
Reference
Last edited: