US landings in North Africa secured the victory as well as the Germans not being able to get troops and supplies to Afrika Corps because they had bigger problems with the Soviets.
What rubbish.The North African Landings was a British-dominated exercise.
The Second Battle of El Alamein, in which the British crushed the Germans, saw no American involvement.
The Germans turned their attention to the invasion of the USSR... thus ending the Battle of Britain.
The Battle of Britain ended after the British won it (without American help).
In fact, the failure of
Germany to achieve its objectives of destroying Britain's air defences, or forcing Britain to negotiate an armistice or an outright surrender, is considered its first major defeat and a crucial turning point in the Second World War
So Britain inflicted Nazi Germany's first major defeat, and did so when fighting Nazi Germany on her own.
The Soviets did all the hard work until the US got involved.
The Soviets and the British.
No British victory in the Battle of Britain = No D-Day Landing in 1944.
It wasn't our fight. You're the ones that foolishly declared war on Germany for Poland... a nation which you abandoned completely during and AFTER the war.
There was nothing foolish in it.
Not only did Britain have to declare war on Germany after it invaded Poland to honour the treaty that stated that either Britain or Poland would go to the other's aid should either get invaded by Germany, but not declaring war on germany would have meant doing what America did for a few years - appeasing the tyranny of Naziism.
No Britain declaring war on Germany in 1939 = Europeans now all speaking German and all having blond hair and blue eyes in the Thousand Year German Reich.
If full German power was concentrated on the Brits you would have been smothered. You just weren't strong enough.