Zimmerman NOT guilty

[petros]

I guess that Martin's big mistake was that he didn't beat Zimmerman unconscious before he had a chance to pull the gun.

I'm sure that you've seen it in the bars over the years - some tough guy decides to go toe to toe with someone that he knows nothing about or if they have a knife or 10 buddies to help out.

Yeah, I've seen plenty of loud mouth, bully sh*theads take a licking that they deserved but never one who pulled a knife or gun because he wasn't man enough to fight.

You should know that Zimmerman is now guilty not by law but by consensus of social engineers, so we better just move along .......:roll:

He f*cking killed somebody. He's not innocent of that. It doesn't bring Martin back to life. WTF is wrong with you? Are you a sociopath?

 

[Locutus]

You should know that Zimmerman is now guilty not by law but by consensus of social engineers, so we better just move along .......:roll:

touché


Thank gawd he was found not guilty of the charge brought against him.

To think otherwise requires seeking help. :lol:

 

[captain morgan]

Why? Is he on trial?

Martin affected the assault... Correct?

You should know that Zimmerman is now guilty not by law but by consensus of social engineers, so we better just move along .......:roll:

Depends on which social engineers you talk to.

I'd wonder if the commentators in the (white) Latin community have a different opinion

 

[Omicron]

touché


Thank gawd he was found not guilty of the charge brought against him.

To think otherwise requires seeking help. :lol:

What if people were to get a law passed saying people with IQ's below 100 are sucks on the economy and torments on the stability of high civilization, such that, although you cannot initiate a fight, there will be no penalty if you kill someone with an IQ below 100 who attacks you?

It could cut the planet's population back to 4.5 billion, which is still too much because we can't be middle-class without destroying the environment with a population beyond 1.5 billion, but it's a start.

 

[Locutus]

Selective Outrage Over Zimmerman / Martin - YouTube

700 (mostly black) murders in Chicago since Trayvon shot.

 

[DaSleeper]

touché


Thank gawd he was found not guilty of the charge brought against him.

To think otherwise requires seeking help. :lol:

What I think of those who insist that trayvon did nothing wrong and think they are entitled to riot....and all their righteous supporters is best described by little ditty....

 

[petros]

Is Charlie Mason a hero because Folgers coffee is gross, disgusting sh*t?

 

[Omicron]

Hmm... what if they were to re-create the situation where he got to be on the other side?

 

[Colpy]

Yeah, I've seen plenty of loud mouth, bully sh*theads take a licking that they deserved but never one who pulled a knife or gun because he wasn't man enough to fight.


He f*cking killed somebody. He's not innocent of that. It doesn't bring Martin back to life. WTF is wrong with you? Are you a sociopath?

You are doing it again.

The same thing you did with Ian Thompson.....who was also exonerated.

All you have demonstrated is the fact that you understand absolutely nothing about the fundamental concept of self defense in law.

I do not really understand why this is such a blind spot for you, but it is. This guy, posted earlier, says it perfectly.......

Selective Outrage Over Zimmerman / Martin - YouTube

.

Perfect

 

[petros]

Did he kill somebody Colpy?

 

[Omicron]

Y
All you have demonstrated is the fact that you understand absolutely nothing about the fundamental concept of self defense in law.

Okay, so if one were to stand in front of another and taunt them by grabbing their croch while hollering, "I dare you to suck my d*ck"... that leaves the taunter innocent?

 

[petros]

You are doing it again.

The same thing you did with Ian Thompson.....who was also exonerated.

All you have demonstrated is the fact that you understand absolutely nothing about the fundamental concept of self defense in law.

I do not really understand why this is such a blind spot for you, but it is. This guy, posted earlier, says it perfectly.......




Perfect

He f*cking killed a kid that he was stalking because he got the sh*t beaten out of him. Blame the dead kid? That's the chicken sh*t way out.

What sort of losers would support a f*cking killer?

 

[gopher]

You know I think everyone really is missing the most important point of this whole thread..

A young teen boy is tragically dead, and two parents will not ever get to see him graduate, get married or have children..


In the memory of young Trayvon, can't we all just get along??


Justice has spoken, Zimmerman has been tried and acquitted. Getting angry, it's not going to change anything..

People are still angry over the OJ and Casey Anthony trials while Claudine Longet is still celebrate on YouTube. That's the way of the world, I suppose.

 

[Mowich]

People are still angry over the OJ and Casey Anthony trials while Claudine Longet is still celebrate on YouTube. That's the way of the world, I suppose.

Yep and depending on what the judge decides the killer of Travis Alexander will once again be hitting the air waves in court. I expect Jane V-Mitchell is gearing up all ready.

 

[JLM]

He f*cking killed a kid that he was stalking because he got the sh*t beaten out of him. Blame the dead kid? That's the chicken sh*t way out.

What sort of losers would support a f*cking killer?

If only it was that simple!

 

[B00Mer]

Selective Outrage Over Zimmerman / Martin - YouTube

700 (mostly black) murders in Chicago since Trayvon shot.

Excellent video..

Zimmerman is 'Not Guilty" in the eyes of the law.. but as I said before, they need to sue NBC, The City Police and Attorney for hiding evidence.. most important, they need to change the laws..

 

[Locutus]

Maybe Jimmy should have the last word:

The jury made the “right decision” in the George Zimmerman murder trial, former President Jimmy Carter said Tuesday.

“I think the jury made the right decision based on the evidence presented, because the prosecution inadvertently set the standard so high that the jury had to be convinced that it was a deliberate act by Zimmerman that he was not at all defending himself, and so forth,” Carter told Atlanta news channel WXIA. “It’s not a moral question, it’s a legal question and the American law requires that the jury listens to the evidence presented.”


Jimmy Carter: George Zimmerman jury ‘right’ - Hadas Gold - POLITICO.com

http://www.11alive.com/news/article...s-Jimmy-Carter-speaks-on-Zimmerman-acquittal-

 

[EagleSmack]

In the US, 17 is still very much a child. 4 years til they are out from under government control still. And yes.... mistake with fists is still a far cry from mistake with a gun.

A 17 year old can also be tried as an adult. So 17 is not very much a child at all.

Excellent video..

Zimmerman is 'Not Guilty" in the eyes of the law.. but as I said before, they need to sue NBC, The City Police and Attorney for hiding evidence.. most important, they need to change the laws..

Oh Zimmerman is going to sue the pants off a lot of people. Even if he was found guilty there was plenty of shenanigans from the DAs office to get an acquittal.

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

A 17 year old can also be tried as an adult. So 17 is not very much a child at all.

A seventeen-year-old who is not an emancipated minor (Martin was not) is a child, or an "infant," at law. The fact that a seventeen-year-old can serve in the military, and can be charged as an adult in certain circumstances, does not change that.

I do like the implication that Trayvon Martin committed a crime, though. Pretty clever the way you slipped it in. Well done.

 

[captain morgan]

I do like the implication that Trayvon Martin committed a crime, though. Pretty clever the way you slipped it in. Well done.

Is assault not a crime in Florida?