It's highly likely you wouldn't be around if the contemporary use of the fight instinct was gone.It is disturbing to see these days that the fight reflex is so much more prevelant in some than is the flight reflex.
It's highly likely you wouldn't be around if the contemporary use of the fight instinct was gone.It is disturbing to see these days that the fight reflex is so much more prevelant in some than is the flight reflex.
It's highly likely you wouldn't be around if the contemporary use of the fight instinct was gone.
Because it's a sad but necessary part of life.Why??
What a fine example of narrow myopic thought.I have never been confronted by a gun.
I can.What should I have done? Used my car as a weapon?? Certainly wouldn't have mattered how many weapons I carried can't drive & shoot at the same time.
Because it's a sad but necessary part of life.
What a fine example of narrow myopic thought.
I can.
Then I would say "play on" the majority rule.
My Gwad and this is the type of person who wants keep access to assault weapons?? How scarey is that!!
It seems to me the more socially advanced we become, the more we should expect our laws and government to reflect that. That is not a bad thing in my opinion.
For thrills try risking money starting a business, or take up sky diving. box, wrestle, etc. The caveman HAD to fight or die and I suspect we would not be around if they did not run often,considering the type of animals they had to contend with. It is disturbing to see these days that the fight reflex is so much more prevelant in some than is the flight reflex. At least with the latter, one does often live to see another day.
Idiots. It's kind of like showing incidently who criminals can target safely.Gawker Publishes Complete 446-Page List of ‘All the A**holes Who Own Guns in New York City’
Gawker Publishes Complete 446-Page List of ‘All the A**holes Who Own Guns in New York City’ | TheBlaze.com
Yep....... A few years ago a neighbour a few doors away had his garage broken into and some stuff stolen...Idiots. It's kind of like showing incidently who criminals can target safely.
IYou ever meet any of the raving loons that want to seize our rifles?
Oh I forgot you are one.
And they keep proving it over and over and over.......:lol:You ever meet any of the raving loons that want to seize our rifles?
Oh I forgot you are one.
I
No I am not. I do not want to seize your rifles. Talk about paranoid!! Imagine someone, not wanting to buy a handgun at the corner store!! What is about deadly killing machines that fascinates some people??
I am against allowing the freedom to purchase handguns without a great many safeguards being taken, and the purchaser not have a history of being mentally unbalanced. Definitely no access to guns firing multiple bullets a second.
Compare those shot by their own guns to the righteous killings of a criminal by an armed citizen.
There was an armed man very close to the killer who shot Congresswoman Gifford and killed - ?5 or ?8 others ( too many mass killings to remember exactly the death toll in all cases) including a very young girl. He nearly shot the unarmed man who actually took the shooter down. Shooter had a handgun that shot 6 bullets a second.
Herein is the problem with national gun control in the USA:
Doug Ross @ Journal: SHOCK, ANGER: Newspaper Publishes Map of Texas Gun Owners
I took that map to read that since it was covered in red....it meant that every house in texas has a gun:lol:Automatic weapons have been prohibited for decades. Did that make the criminals hand in their guns? Hand guns have been registered since the 30s and yet criminals still have unregistered automatic handguns. The only people affected by your draconian laws are the law abiding gun owners. Why do you want to punish them?
Actually that map is not true either. It only shows the ones that were foolish enough to register some/ all of their guns.