Jewish MP: Israel acting like Nazis in Gaza

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Lets recap here.

Colpy claims that only killing a 1000 innocent civilians over a three week period demonstrated an "amazing restraint and care taken by Israelis".

Therefore it would reasonable to assume that Colpy would describe only killing 17,000 innocent civilians (more likely less than 10,000) over a 70 week period as an even greater level of restraint and care taken by the Syrians.

I'm sorry you are having a hard time with grade 6 math.

Show me where Colpy made that particular statement- word for ffn word - If not retract it.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Show me where Colpy made that particular statement- word for ffn word - If not retract it.
Not going to happen Goob's. EAO as moved up from ideological troll, to garden variety troll.

I don't think even he's as daft as his silly logic would indicate.

But I could be wrong.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Lets recap here.

Colpy claims that only killing a 1000 innocent civilians over a three week period demonstrated an "amazing restraint and care taken by Israelis".

Therefore it would reasonable to assume that Colpy would describe only killing 17,000 innocent civilians (more likely less than 10,000) over a 70 week period as an even greater level of restraint and care taken by the Syrians.

I'm sorry you are having a hard time with grade 6 math.

Ya know I can be pretty dumb at times- but what is it like being dumb all the time. To make claims that are utter BS- to have your claims torn to shreds- you have no creditability on this issue.
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Show me where Colpy made that particular statement- word for ffn word - If not retract it.
Click on link:
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/n...oportionate-response-hamas-3.html#post1047510



direct copy and paste from the above link:
....1000 dead civilians after 21 days of warfare in the most densely packed population centre on earth shows amazing restraint and care taken by Israelis.

Here's the entire post in context:


Colpy wrote on Feb 4th, 2009


Yep.

The Israelis fought in the most densely populated area on earth for 21 days, using the most sophisticated conventional air, sea, and land power known.


They killed 1300 people. Somewhere between 25 and 50 % of those were militants.


they were carefully avoiding civilian casualties as much as possible while achieving their strategic ends.


In comparison, Allied Bomber command, using only air power, killed 80,000 people in the city of Dresden in a single night.........65 years ago.


THAT is targeting civilians.


The Americans killed considerably more than 100,000 in a single night raid on Tokyo.


THAT is targeting civilians.


At the very outside,
1000 dead civilians after 21 days of warfare in the most densely packed population centre on earth shows amazing restraint and care taken by Israelis.

Despite several incidents such as those above. Start tossing tons of explosives around, and Shyte happens.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Click on link:
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/n...oportionate-response-hamas-3.html#post1047510



direct copy and paste from the above link:
....1000 dead civilians after 21 days of warfare in the most densely packed population centre on earth shows amazing restraint and care taken by Israelis.

Here's the entire post in context:
Yep.

The Israelis fought in the most densely populated area on earth for 21 days, using the most sophisticated conventional air, sea, and land power known.

They killed 1300 people. Somewhere between 25 and 50 % of those were militants.

they were carefully avoiding civilian casualties as much as possible while achieving their strategic ends.

In comparison, Allied Bomber command, using only air power, killed 80,000 people in the city of Dresden in a single night.........65 years ago.

THAT is targeting civilians.

The Americans killed considerably more than 100,000 in a single night raid on Tokyo.

THAT is targeting civilians.

At the very outside, 1000 dead civilians after 21 days of warfare in the most densely packed population centre on earth shows amazing restraint and care taken by Israelis.

Despite several incidents such as those above. Start tossing tons of explosives around, and Shyte happens.
Stop embarrassing yourself already.

Your posts are just getting more and more pathetic.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Click on link:
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/n...oportionate-response-hamas-3.html#post1047510



direct copy and paste from the above link:
....1000 dead civilians after 21 days of warfare in the most densely packed population centre on earth shows amazing restraint and care taken by Israelis.

Here's the entire post in context:



Yep.

The Israelis fought in the most densely populated area on earth for 21 days, using the most sophisticated conventional air, sea, and land power known.


They killed 1300 people. Somewhere between 25 and 50 % of those were militants.


they were carefully avoiding civilian casualties as much as possible while achieving their strategic ends.


In comparison, Allied Bomber command, using only air power, killed 80,000 people in the city of Dresden in a single night.........65 years ago.


THAT is targeting civilians.


The Americans killed considerably more than 100,000 in a single night raid on Tokyo.


THAT is targeting civilians.


At the very outside,
1000 dead civilians after 21 days of warfare in the most densely packed population centre on earth shows amazing restraint and care taken by Israelis.

Despite several incidents such as those above. Start tossing tons of explosives around, and Shyte happens.

Did you read your own link Bucky- Link and copy and paste it- you can do that for us that have a problem with mah and English-
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Did you read your own link Bucky- Link and copy and paste it- you can do that for us that have a problem with mah and English-
Goob's, he's stuck in a loop. He likely knows he's made a grave error, but will not admit it at all costs.

Just look at the flotilla thread. His claims have been thoroughly proven false, and absurd.

That has upset him greatly. Hence the angst and anger in this thread.

As long as his feelings are hurt, this will continue. But have hope, he usually cools off over night.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Goob's, he's stuck in a loop. He likely knows he's made a grave error, but will not admit it at all costs.

Just look at the flotilla thread. His claims have been thoroughly proven false, and absurd.

That has upset him greatly. Hence the angst and anger in this thread.

As long as his feelings are hurt, this will continue. But have hope, he usually cools off over night.

Oh I know - When he started retracting and apologizing I had hoped for a change. Guess i was wrong.
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Maybe if I post it in bold and bigger letters you guys will get it.

Colpy claims that only killing a 1000 innocent civilians over a three week period demonstrated an "amazing restraint and care taken by Israelis".

Therefore it would reasonable to assume that Colpy would describe only killing 17,000 innocent civilians (more likely less than 10,000) over a 70 week period as an even greater level of restraint and care taken by the Syrians.

If the Syrians had exercised the same level of amazing restraint and care as the Israelis they would have killed 23,333 Syrians by now, not 17,000.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Maybe if I post it in bold and bigger letters you guys will get it.

Colpy claims that only killing a 1000 innocent civilians over a three week period demonstrated an "amazing restraint and care taken by Israelis".

Therefore it would reasonable to assume that Colpy would describe only killing 17,000 innocent civilians (more likely less than 10,000) over a 70 week period as an even greater level of restraint and care taken by the Syrians.

If the Syrians had exercised the same level of amazing restraint and care as the Israelis they would have killed 23,333 Syrians by now, not 17,000.

Nope again- Do you know what the average ratio is for soldiers - civilians killed during combat. Well do you.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Maybe if I post it in bold and bigger letters you guys will get it.

Colpy claims that only killing a 1000 innocent civilians over a three week period demonstrated an "amazing restraint and care taken by Israelis".

Therefore it would reasonable to assume that Colpy would describe only killing 17,000 innocent civilians (more likely less than 10,000) over a 70 week period as an even greater level of restraint and care taken by the Syrians.

If the Syrians had exercised the same level of amazing restraint and care as the Israelis they would have killed 23,333 Syrians by now, not 17,000.


There's nothing to get.

The argument is...

If I recall you are on the record as saying that only killing 1000 innocent civilians every 3 weeks shows amazing restraint and care.

Colpy never said that, lol. I don't care about the rest of your original post, lol.

You can do mathmatic back flips, till the cows come home.

You're still a liar, lol.

The fact that you keep going back to that is incredibly funny though.
 
Last edited:

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Colpy's post to prove that the Israeli's used "amazing restraint and care" referenced a ratio because it gave two numbers. Because the ratio referenced time, that makes it a special kind of ratio known as a "rate".

The rate at which Israelis killed innocent civilians was 1000 civilians over 3 weeks . Clearly a rate, not a total as you two imply. If Colpy's value was a total, he just would have said 1000 civilians without a reference to time. But as soon as he includes time as a second number, then it becomes a rate, not a total.

He also mentioned the Dresden bombing... 80,000 of dead in one night... that statement references a rate, not a total.

He also mentioned the Tokyo bombing... 100,000 in a single night raid. Also a rate.

According to Colpy, these death "rates" proved deliberate targeting of civilians. Killing civilians at a much lower "rate" by Israelis "shows amazing restraint and care"

Since the Syrian "rate" of killing civilians is much lower than the "rate" at which Israelis killed civilians, then it would be logical to assume that Colpy would agree that the Syrians have demonstrated a greater level of restraint and care.


BTW, Take any three weeks of the Syrian uprising and you won't find any period where the Syrians killed innocent civilians at a greater rate than the Israelis did during Cast Lead.

Take any Israeli incursion into Gaza in the last 10 years and you won't find a rate of killing innocent civilians less than the rate Syrian rate of killing innocent civilians.

Let me know when you guys understand the difference between total and rate.
 
Last edited:

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Colpy's post to prove that the Israeli's used "amazing restraint and care" referenced a ratio because it gave two numbers. Because the ratio was referenced time, that makes it a special kind of ratio known as a "rate".

The rate at which Israelis killed innocent civilians was 1000 civilians over 3 weeks . Clearly a rate, not a total as you idiots are implying. If Colpy's value was a total, he just would have said 1000 civilians without a reference to time. But as soon as he includes time as a second number, then it becomes a rate, not a total. In this case the "rate" of Israeli slaughter of innocent civilians was 1000 dead innocent civilians over a three week period.

He mentioned the Dresden bombing... 80,000 of dead in one night... also a rate.

He mentioned the Tokyo bombing... 100,000 in a single night raid. Also a rate.

According to Colpy, these death "rates" proved deliberate targeting of civilians. Killing civilians at a much lower "rate" by Israelis "shows amazing restraint and care"

Since the Syrian "rate" of killing civilians is much lower than the "rate" at which Israelis killed civilians, then it would be logical to assume that Colpy would agree that the Syrians have demonstrated a greater level of restraint and care.


BTW, Take any three weeks of the Syrian uprising and you won't find any period where the Syrians killed innocent civilians at a greater rate than the Israelis did during Cast Lead.

Take any Israeli incursion into Gaza in the last 10 years and you won't find a rate of killing innocent civilians less than the rate Syrian rate of killing innocent civilians.

Let me know when you guys understand the difference between total and rate.


You still misrepresented what Colpy said...

Let me know when you guys understand the difference between total and rate.
Let me know when you're done embarrassing yourself...
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
BTW, please respect forum rules and do not attack people.  I could have
called CB a liar for portraying three weeks of mass slaughter as a
single event. Yet I restrained myself. You two should try to do like
wise. Despite your insults and taunts, the worst I did was call you an
idiot and I just retracted that term

Have a nice day....
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Colpy's post to prove that the Israeli's used "amazing restraint and care" referenced a ratio because it gave two numbers. Because the ratio referenced time, that makes it a special kind of ratio known as a "rate".

The rate at which Israelis killed innocent civilians was 1000 civilians over 3 weeks . Clearly a rate, not a total as you two imply. If Colpy's value was a total, he just would have said 1000 civilians without a reference to time. But as soon as he includes time as a second number, then it becomes a rate, not a total.

He also mentioned the Dresden bombing... 80,000 of dead in one night... that statement references a rate, not a total.

He also mentioned the Tokyo bombing... 100,000 in a single night raid. Also a rate.

According to Colpy, these death "rates" proved deliberate targeting of civilians. Killing civilians at a much lower "rate" by Israelis "shows amazing restraint and care"

Since the Syrian "rate" of killing civilians is much lower than the "rate" at which Israelis killed civilians, then it would be logical to assume that Colpy would agree that the Syrians have demonstrated a greater level of restraint and care.


BTW, Take any three weeks of the Syrian uprising and you won't find any period where the Syrians killed innocent civilians at a greater rate than the Israelis did during Cast Lead.

Take any Israeli incursion into Gaza in the last 10 years and you won't find a rate of killing innocent civilians less than the rate Syrian rate of killing innocent civilians.

Let me know when you guys understand the difference between total and rate.

What are the reported deaths by the Syrian Govt. in the past 3 weeks?
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
Colpy's post to prove that the Israeli's used "amazing restraint and care" referenced a ratio because it gave two numbers. Because the ratio referenced time, that makes it a special kind of ratio known as a "rate".

The rate at which Israelis killed innocent civilians was 1000 civilians over 3 weeks . Clearly a rate, not a total as you two imply. If Colpy's value was a total, he just would have said 1000 civilians without a reference to time. But as soon as he includes time as a second number, then it becomes a rate, not a total.

He also mentioned the Dresden bombing... 80,000 of dead in one night... that statement references a rate, not a total.

He also mentioned the Tokyo bombing... 100,000 in a single night raid. Also a rate.

According to Colpy, these death "rates" proved deliberate targeting of civilians. Killing civilians at a much lower "rate" by Israelis "shows amazing restraint and care"

Since the Syrian "rate" of killing civilians is much lower than the "rate" at which Israelis killed civilians, then it would be logical to assume that Colpy would agree that the Syrians have demonstrated a greater level of restraint and care.


BTW, Take any three weeks of the Syrian uprising and you won't find any period where the Syrians killed innocent civilians at a greater rate than the Israelis did during Cast Lead.

Take any Israeli incursion into Gaza in the last 10 years and you won't find a rate of killing innocent civilians less than the rate Syrian rate of killing innocent civilians.

Let me know when you guys understand the difference between total and rate.
With logic like that you could become a lefty politician
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
BTW, please respect forum rules and do not attack people. 
Why do you hold us to standards you don't hold yourself to?

I could have called CB a liar for portraying three weeks of mass slaughter as a single event.
You could have, but it would be a lie like the one where you misrepresented what Colpy posted.

Yet I restrained myself.
A short while after you were warned.

You two should try to do likewise.
I haven't attacked you.

Despite your insults and taunts, the worst I did was call you an idiot and I just retracted that term
Just because you retract it, doesn't mean you didn't say it, lol.

Have a nice day....
Thanks to the idiocy contained in your posts, I will...