Iran, beware! ... Iran, beware!

[Ocean Breeze]

Why would God be any more successful at fixing this problem, than he's been with any of the other several thousand major problems in the world?


.....

Why would anyone want "god" to solve problems that are continuously created by mankind??? Shirking responsibility , comes to mind.

This is the kind of magical thinking that interferes with progress and makes the sheeple, even more sheeple minded.

If Iran were to go nuke.....it would just make things a lot more balanced. There are grave threats to Iran currently .......mostly coming from the US and Israel. The USian lust for blood and war has not been sated and won't be until it thinks it is in control of the entire planet. Too bad its goals and the reality of its finances are in a serious disconnect.8O

PS......Canada should remain neutral and follow the lead of the Swiss. Too bad Harper is such a US wannabee. and would join any war the US would start. THAT does not bode well for Canada.

 

[Goober]

Why would God be any more successful at fixing this problem, than he's been with any of the other several thousand major problems in the world?


.....

Why would anyone want "god" to solve problems that are continuously created by mankind??? Shirking responsibility , comes to mind.

This is the kind of magical thinking that interferes with progress and makes the sheeple, even more sheeple minded.

If Iran were to go nuke.....it would just make things a lot more balanced. There are grave threats to Iran currently .......mostly coming from the US and Israel. The USian lust for blood and war has not been sated and won't be until it thinks it is in control of the entire planet. Too bad its goals and the reality of its finances are in a serious disconnect.8O

PS......Canada should remain neutral and follow the lead of the Swiss. Too bad Harper is such a US wannabee. and would join any war the US would start. THAT does not bode well for Canada.

Iran with Nukes would make things more balanced - How would that come about?

 

[AnnaG]

>head in hands<

Gentlemen and Ladies.

Remember when there was a time when Canada did not get involved in improper international conflicts?

Remember how there was a time when we would not have spent 9 billion dollars on old-fart super-expensive jets that cannot be used on anything except global war and/or coalition strikes, when we could have easily spent that money building submarines that work in order to patrol the arctic? Am I the only guy here who learned from war games that the side with the most subs always wins? Do you have any idea how beautifully effective the subs would be if built with proper Canadian workmanship and management? They would be the Avro Arrows of the sea, and the only problem would be if selfish system-users like CDNBear get involved.

I am not saying that what I am about to say is a necessity. I just want it to be considered.

If you look at a satellite map you will see that Iran is geographically different from all the lands around it.

It is on a plateau.

They are not Arabs. They are Iranian... their own people with 60 million.

If you look around, you'll notice that they are surrounded by small, idiot nations. Most of those nations had their borders drawn by Stalin, who wanted to make sure that if they split, they would be at war against themselves.

Iran is a real people not any more evil than anyone else, and they are surrounded by the nuclear powers of Pakistan, Russia, Israel, China, and India.

If one were to look at it political-geographically, one might think that it's a completely logical nation to have nukes, given who they are and what they are surrounded with, and the logical position of Canada would be to say that we disapprove insolong as meat-headed Mullahs are in charge, but if good Iranians get in charge (which we know they have in abundance), then we say nothing before the UN.

If good Iranians get nukes, it will be no more problem than Pakistan and/or India. In fact, it will make for some stability over those jerk-off little 'stani republics around them like how France makes stability over north Africa.

So... Canada's position should be that no opinion will be stated about Iran going nuclear if good people take over the government of Iran.

So, considering the topic, you are saying that Allah thinks Iran should have nukes?

 

[Ocean Breeze]

Why should only "favored" countries have nukes??? The thing is that all this stuff about Iran is NOT about nukes. That is just another big lie. It is a political power play and build up to either invading Iran or having Israel do the dirty deed.

the motive is territorial control along with resources control.

all is never what we are told. Just like those WMD that bush terrorized the population with in order to invade Iraq.........when he had his eye on invading Iraq before he took office. All he needed was an excuse. along came 9-11 and he could not believe the opportunities this opened up for him....and being what he was.......he made sure to take advantage of all of them.... while feeding the population more lies , which were then compounded by more lies.

......USian dirty politics as usual.

There is NO valid reason to invade Iran. but watch the spin meisters create "reasons".............even if it takes some black op....."incident".

 

[AnnaG]

Why would God be any more successful at fixing this problem, than he's been with any of the other several thousand major problems in the world?


.....

Why would anyone want "god" to solve problems that are continuously created by mankind??? Shirking responsibility , comes to mind.

According to the Quran and Bible, this immature, dense, murderous god invented humans, so anything the humans do is ultimately the responsibility of the inventor.

This is the kind of magical thinking that interferes with progress and makes the sheeple, even more sheeple minded.

That's what religions were meant to do.

If Iran were to go nuke.....it would just make things a lot more balanced. There are grave threats to Iran currently .......mostly coming from the US and Israel. The USian lust for blood and war has not been sated and won't be until it thinks it is in control of the entire planet. Too bad its goals and the reality of its finances are in a serious disconnect.8O

Perhaps. Or else it would just be another crackpot, tyrannical country with a nuke or two a la N. Korea.

PS......Canada should remain neutral and follow the lead of the Swiss. Too bad Harper is such a US wannabee. and would join any war the US would start. THAT does not bode well for Canada.

Yeah. I like neutrality. Military only for protection of self and those offering aid to others (like A-stan should be).

 

[Ocean Breeze]

So, considering the topic, you are saying that Allah thinks Iran should have nukes?

is this a SERIOUS question??? bordering on the irrational..

 

[Goober]

Why should only "favored" countries have nukes??? The thing is that all this stuff about Iran is NOT about nukes. That is just another big lie. It is a political power play and build up to either invading Iran or having Israel do the dirty deed.

the motive is territorial control along with resources control.

all is never what we are told. Just like those WMD that bush terrorized the population with in order to invade Iraq.........when he had his eye on invading Iraq before he took office. All he needed was an excuse. along came 9-11 and he could not believe the opportunities this opened up for him....and being what he was.......he made sure to take advantage of all of them.... while feeding the population more lies , which were then compounded by more lies.

......USian dirty politics as usual.

There is NO valid reason to invade Iran. but watch the spin meisters create "reasons".............even if it takes some black op....."incident".

And I guess al the reports from the UN Inspectors are totally bogus - Ya right.

Now explain you point about balance in the region if they had Nukes?

OCB - Your post - referring to Iran and Nukes
If Iran were to go nuke.....it would just make things a lot more balanced. There are grave threats to Iran currently .......mostly coming from the US and Israel. The USian lust for blood and war has not been sated and won't be until it thinks it is in control of the entire planet. Too bad its goals and the reality of its finances are in a serious disconnect.:shock:

PS......Canada should remain neutral and follow the lead of the Swiss. Too bad Harper is such a US wannabee. and would join any war the US would start. THAT does not bode well for Canada.

 

[Ocean Breeze]

According to the Quran and Bible, this immature, dense, murderous god invented humans, so anything the humans do is ultimately the responsibility of the inventor.

That's what religions were meant to do.

Perhaps. Or else it would just be another crackpot, tyrannical country with a nuke or two a la N. Korea.

Yeah. I like neutrality. Military only for protection of self and those offering aid to others (like A-stan should be).

superb points. Like your THINKING....:smile:

(seems that "religion" has long passed its expiration date.;-)

Albertastan??? Wow. Selling out to the US not enough??? Just sayin'

 

[AnnaG]

So, considering the topic, you are saying that Allah thinks Iran should have nukes?

is this a SERIOUS question???

Yes.

bordering on the irrational..

*shrugs* That's a matter of opinion. So far I don't think much of them.

 

[Goober]

superb points. Like your THINKING....:smile:

(seems that "religion" has long passed its expiration date.;-)

Albertastan??? Wow. Selling out to the US not enough??? Just sayin'

My Question was to difficult for such incisive thinking, linear and non linear thoght process your unquestioned \bility to see history, past, present and future to understand that ramifications of Iran with Nukes has made me sit down and consider your insight with the due care and attention it deserves

.

You Sir are amazing.

I eagerly await your next magical trick.

YouTube - ‪Fart in Public (Farting in Library) by Nalts‬‎

Your Pal and Servant
Goober

 

[ironsides]

Pentagon has plan for attack

A Pentagon strike against Iran would rely heavily on the B-2 bomber and cruise missiles to try to destroy the regime's ability to make nuclear weapons, analysts say, after the top U.S. military officer said a war plan is in place.
The missiles, fired from surface ships, submarines and B-52 bombers, would take out air defenses and nuclear-related facilities.
The B-2s would drop tons of bombs, including ground penetrators, onto fortified and buried sites where Tehran is suspected of enriching uranium to fuel the weapons and working on warheads.
"It will be primarily an air attack with covert work to start a 'velvet' revolution so [the] Iranian people can take back their country," said retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney, a former fighter pilot.

Bombers, missiles could end Iran nukes - Washington Times

 

[AnnaG]

Great. Thousands more civilians down the tubes.

 

[EagleSmack]

Ai, yi, yi

 

[AnnaG]

Someone grab yer tailfeathers? lol

 

[Cliffy]

Several of us have been saying this for a year or more but we were called foil hatters. More proof that military intelligence is an oxymoron. There is no proof of nuclear weapons program. This is just another excuse to destabilize the middle east. Also more proof of the Pentagon being the biggest terrorist organization on the planet. More unfounded "weapons of mass destruction" hysteria to justify bombing the crap out of another advanced civilization. Obama is just a darker shade of Bush.

Someone grab yer tailfeathers? lol

Sounded more like his short and curlies.

 

[EagleSmack]

Several of us have been saying this for a year or more but we were called foil hatters. More proof that military intelligence is an oxymoron. There is no proof of nuclear weapons program. This is just another excuse to destabilize the middle east. Also more proof of the Pentagon being the biggest terrorist organization on the planet. More unfounded "weapons of mass destruction" hysteria to justify bombing the crap out of another advanced civilization. Obama is just a darker shade of Bush.


Sounded more like his short and curlies.

Well until the bombs start falling you still are.

Many of ya'll were saying Bush was going to do it and that was a big FAIL.

Obama sure won't do it.

I am sure there are plans to bomb them but until we do...buckle up that foil hat!

Sounded more like his short and curlies.

What era do you think this is? The 60's?

 

[DurkaDurka]

All I got to say is, **** Iran. Let them build their Ghetto nukes and destroy them selves in the process.

 

[ironsides]

 

[eanassir]

Consequences of attacking Iran:
It may be the Americans will attack Iran, as did they attack Iraq, so that the occupation of both Iraq and Iran will appear as a sort of victory for Israel on the present measures, but it will lead to the following:

A- destroying the present Iran government, and this will make a blow for the enthusiasm about the imams of Ahlul Bait, which Iran exports to the other Muslim countries and all over the world.

In case the Iranians will desert their enthusiasm about the imams and devote themselves to God alone and hold fast with the Quran --> then nothing will touch them, and God will avert from them every harm.

B- give the final blow to the American economy, out of which it will never arise again.

C- make the things go against the Zionists from now on.

On the other hand, all such acts against Iran in the present time is planned, designed and enhanced by the Zionists in Israel and in USA.

What concerns the American people:
1- Attacking Iran will lead to disastrous breakdown of the already exhausted American economy.

2- The Zionists cannot help to restore the economy of America back to its normal condition. On the contrary, the Zionists are a heavy burden on the American economy, and it is much better to get rid of such a heavy burden to the general advantage of America and the American people.

3- Iran will not be that easy: Iran is a tremendous country with economic and people capability to stand in the face of such attacks and will cause much casualties among the American soldiers and the American advantage everywhere.

4- Such act against Iran and its Muslim people will expose the bias of the American government to the side of the Zionists against the Muslim Iranian people.

 

[ironsides]

What concerns the American people:
1- Attacking Iran will lead to disastrous breakdown of the already exhausted American economy.

2- The Zionists cannot help to restore the economy of America back to its normal condition. On the contrary, the Zionists are a heavy burden on the American economy, and it is much better to get rid of such a heavy burden to the general advantage of America and the American people.

3- Iran will not be that easy: Iran is a tremendous country with economic and people capability to stand in the face of such attacks and will cause much casualties among the American soldiers and the American advantage everywhere.

4- Such act against Iran and its Muslim people will expose the bias of the American government to the side of the Zionists against the Muslim Iranian people.

"*What concerns the American people*: Our economy of course, taxes and people attacking our rights.

1- Attacking Iran will lead to disastrous breakdown of the already exhausted American economy."
No, War usually helps an economy, people working etc. (unless your on the receiving end) Remember the Republican Guard, in this case Iranian foot soldiers would be spared.

"2- The Zionists cannot help to restore the economy of America back to its normal condition. On the contrary, the Zionists are a heavy burden on the American economy, and it is much better to get rid of such a heavy burden to the general advantage of America and the American people."
Again your wrong, what you do not understand is that there are no Zionists in the U.S. working for other countries, we all are Americans.

3- Iran will not be that easy: Iran is a tremendous country with economic and people capability to stand in the face of such attacks and will cause much casualties among the American soldiers and the American advantage everywhere. As Gen. McInerney stated the war would be over in about 2 days and there will be no American land invasion of Iran the anti goverment forces/people will take over. What will be accomplished is that Iranian nuclear capabilities will be destroyed.


4- Such act against Iran and its Muslim people will expose the bias of the American government to the side of the Zionists against the Muslim Iranian people.
Again a false notion, we do not have to invade with land forces, Iran can be knocked out in 2 days as was stated. Nuclear capabilities destroyed totally.

"4- Such act against Iran and its Muslim people will expose the bias of the American government to the side of the Zionists against the Muslim Iranian people."
This is not a anti Muslim anything, but a means to destroy the dictatorial Iranian goverment and replace it with a real peoples democracy or what ever they want without fixed elections.


Almost forgot, there will be a world wide food shortage, Canada and the U.S. will be exporting.