Gun Control is Completely Useless.

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
It's kind of a "Catch 22" situation, if you aren't armed and someone breaks into your house you will probably get killed and if you are armed and you shoot the assh*le, if he survives he can sue you and if he dies you get charged with murder in the first degree.


Again, in Florida and some other states, a mans home is his castle. Someone breaking into your home is in most cases lucky to get out of the situation alive. He cannot sue you so no need for a head shot. I have to admit our law has gone a wee bit to far in that If I just feel threatened by you (no threat intended on your part), I can shoot you because I am in fear of my own life.
(That is something you really have to be able to prove)
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
“Currently, 39 states have laws that allow residents to carry firearms to protect
themselves, only if they pass a background check and pay a fee to cover
administrative costs. Most of those states also require applicants to have firearms
safety training. Do you support or oppose this law?”


An overwhelming majority of Americans (83 percent) support concealed-carry
laws, while only 11 percent oppose them. A majority of Independent voters (86 percent),
Democrats (80 percent), young voters age 18-29 (83 percent), Hispanic voters (80
percent), and those who voted for President Obama (80 percent) support the right to carry
a firearm.
http://olearyreport.com/media/pdf/Sotomayor%20PostCmteVote%20(7.3.09).pdf

My OP is about Canada and its situation with and attitudes about firearms.

Anyway, not everyone in Canuckville has insurance and not everyone is Canada is blase about everything they own.
 
Last edited:

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
My OP is about Canada and its situation with and attitudes about firearms.

Anyway, not everyone in Canuckville has insurance and not everyone is Canada is blase about everything they own.

I wasn't attacking your OP, just adding how most Americans think.


 

Unforgiven

Force majeure
May 28, 2007
6,770
137
63
Anyway, not everyone in Canuckville has insurance and not everyone is Canada is blase about everything they own.

It's stupid not to have insurance. As for blase about everything they own, show me where a tv or some jewlery has a value that's higher than someone's life. Everything in the average home can be replaced.
 

Unforgiven

Force majeure
May 28, 2007
6,770
137
63
They used to have a law like that in Florida not to long ago, not that you had to have a weapon, but that everyone should be able to protect themselves with just about anything they wanted. Lasted about 5 years and they started issuing permits and doing background checks.

Why did they switch from one to the other?
I noticed no one has bothered to offer up some alternative method of controling who has a gun. Is that meant to imply that in the gun industry there are no reasonable arguments supporting some alternate ideas?
 

Liberalman

Senate Member
Mar 18, 2007
5,623
36
48
Toronto
I heard through the government grape vine that the government is expanding the gun registry program by moving it from Miramichi to one of the western provinces and they are doubling the staff.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Gun control is of paramount impotence the way you and others handle it. You create a forbidden fruit, and that is the main problem.

I don't handle guns as much as you have ironsides I respect your perspective on weapons and the care and handling of same especially in the company of other armed bipeds. You know when somebody in the gang don't follow the rules, he gets the **** kicked out of himself. The state has to know where the weapons are in times like these especially. I don't care if you have or want guns. You'll find if you look that the same people worried about your old rifle are the same people that want you to believe that 911 was an enemy terrorist attack. They want your guns not me. I'm not worried that you'll be raiding my gated mansion. :lol:
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Gun Control is here, and here to stay. If you believe that any party will stop it (Cons included), you are deluded.

This is true, in a way.

But the fact is that we are talking about degree here......the law should reflect some respect for ancient rights, practicality, and usefulness.

I have no problem with licensing, training and background checks.

I have huge problems with ever-more restrictive classifications and prohibitions of firearms (now the Liberals, Bloq, and NDP are after semi-automatics....popular since 1900, and handguns). I also have problems with legislated search without reasonable cause.....etc.

The cons, given a majority, will dump the long-gun registry.........

and the Cons will not belabour us with any more gun legislation written by drooling idiots like David Miller.
 

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
You will never get Unanimity here about gun control because Canada has decided to have gun control far in excess of what is needed. You have surpassed even New York who probably has the strictest gun control in the U.S. They allow anyone to apply for a concealed pistol permit, but only grant it after a complete background check, including mental health, criminal, character, local police, F.B.I. etc. Then and only then will you be issued a restricted permit. (target shooting, hunting only etc.) Takes about 8 months before a permit is issued.


As I mentioned before you try to ban them all together, thus creating the forbidden fruit. Let weapons be available and allow people to own them after a complete check similar to N.Y..