The reality is that you and I are probably the only ones that might return the money.
Funny you should mention that. I have found a few wallets in my time, but none more recently that seven years ago. It was small time cash, and my philosophy at the time was: Keep the the petty cash as my "reward", and put the wallet with the cards, and ID in the mailbox. Buddy will be happy just for his ID and sh!t, I know I would. Plus I had not so desirable occupations back then, and was mad at the world for being broke...
On that note, I'm pretty confident that I'm a lot more mature now, then when I was in my teens and early twenties. I have a better paying career now, and I'm pretty sure I would return petty cash and property to the rightful owner....:lol: There's a limit though. Eighty thousand? ... You only had to ask me once!;-)
I can say that because we recognize the real temptation the money would offer to our human natures. In that recognition there is a real ability to oppose it if we wished. If someone won't recognize it then how can they oppose it? They can't.
This has more to do with our current debate on objective morality, but believe I have never been more pleased with one of your statements. I unequivocally agree.
To know what's right, you have to know what's wrong.
"A man can't call a line crooked, unless he has some idea of a straight one." -CS Lewis
And that's why in the "Do you believe in Evil?" thread, I posed the questions:
How do you know what evil is, UNLESS you have an idea of what good is? And how do know what good is, UNLESS there is an objective standard of such thing?
Like I said, this has less to do with this threads certain act, but more the bigger debate we've been having. I hate spreading the debate all over the map, but whatever.