According to you, they same thing you do in your neighborhoods, just without your fancy costume.(Batman)
Shyte......I forgot that one Tourette patients have such memory for repeating their stuff.The Tena Twist?![]()
And you're an.................You sure are immature for a guy your age.
Just a thought.
Imagine if people that believed Zimmerman was guilty carried on in the way this thread has turned into.
No one in particular.
Just sayin is all.
Thank god stupidity is over represented on this forum in proportion to the overall population.
Thank god stupidity is over represented on this forum in proportion to the overall population.
Not stupidity- just a free for all,things get heated.
I would hope it gets back to a somewhat reasonable discussion.
Just sayin is all.
If you go thru the thread you will see portions. Not many but posting insults to the forum just aggravates it. Would you agree?When has there ever been a reasonable discussion on this case?
Right.
Following someone is NOT illegal.
Stalking, in Florida, requires that one "willfully, maliciously. AND repeatedly follow..". Obviously Zimmerman was NOT stalking in any legal sense.
If Martin thought he was a robber (a laughable idea) why did he not just continue home?? He had between two and four minutes to cover the less than 100 yards......
Instead, he circled back, confronted Zimmerman, and (according to Zimmerman) attacked him.
Now, the idiots commenting on this case wanted Zimmerman convicted for
a) the perfectly legal act of following and /or questioning Martin.
and/or
b) initiating an assault and then shooting Martin.....a imaginary scenario with absolutely no evidence to support it.........
In other words, for those of you that are a little slow, they want GZ convicted for perfectly legal acts, and/or acts that occurred only in their imagination.
Too weird.
How is the oxygen at your altitude?I think the answer here lies in this statement from the news report........" None of the witnesses who were called had a clear view of their encounter."
Seems to me there is not much more to discuss!
correct and thus he is not guilty, but he sure as hell is not innocentI think the answer here lies in this statement from the news report........" None of the witnesses who were called had a clear view of their encounter."
Seems to me there is not much more to discuss!
And if he wasn't playing Batman and going it alone, what would the outcome had of been?
If you go thru the thread you will see portions. Not many but posting insults to the forum just aggravates it. Would you agree?