Well perhaps if you didn't yell, didn't insult as a main tactic or actually supplied something credible, you could get through.LOOK PAL IVE EXPLAINED MANY TIMES I SUFFER FROM DYSLEXIA, AND IF SPELLING THAT WORD AIN'T HARD ENOUGH FOR PEOPLE LIKE ME, THEN THE GUY WHO INVENTED IT TO DESCRIBE OUR CONDITION, SHOULD BE SHOT, BUT HEY I CARE NOT, LIKE I SAY WHAT IS THE POINT OF ME TALKING TO YOU CDNBEAR ,YOU AND ME WILL NEVER AGREE SO IM NOT BOTHERED ANY MORE, ABOUT YOUR CONSTANT WHINING IN MY THREADS, IVE HAD IT WITH YOU LOT LIKE IVE SAID BEFORE," ITS LIKE TRYING TO EDUCATE PORK."!!!!!!
Well perhaps if you didn't yell, didn't insult as a main tactic or actually supplied something credible, you could get through.
As for whining?
You spent the bulk of your time here whining about how stupid we all are, how everything you post is verifiable and how your right and we're wrong.
Now, how about providing some proof, other then the copy & paste bs you continually supply. Try something tangible. Something like what I asked for, about your pic. Some hard proof.
Here's the jist dude. I have hard proof, I've found it myself. I didn't need a site to dig it u...er...make it up for me.
Go out and educate yourself. It isn't hard. Unless you believe what you believe because that all you want to believe.
Call that gentleman who's telephone number I supplied and ask him how a kiln works and ask him if my equation is correct.
That has to be the simplest thing you can do to start using reality, instead of the net to learn.
Well perhaps if you didn't yell, didn't insult as a main tactic or actually supplied something credible, you could get through.
when i started in this thread i was prepared to give you facts as i saw them, but you persisted with remarks like, "free fall" whats that i want proof .? thermite ignition caps det cord, you wanted me to provide proof of lots of things impossible ,without cut/pasting some things, to back up my theory's, but when i show these yet again you come back with your pathetic smileys pics, as if they proved anything ,only thing they proved to me was you did not like it, when i showed you some thing irrefutable, many times Ive proved you wrong, like about the plane, and **** but then you try a different tactic, and attack from another angle, you tell me how the hell I'm meant to provide evidence, without going to a web page, to substanciate my clams you tell me ,even you use them,to prove your claims and besides the web is a great place to find things of relevanceNow, how about providing some proof, other then the copy & paste
First off...No we're talking about ground zero and the heat and fire still smoldering months after 9/11. The principal is the same as an airtight stove and a kiln.i was brought up in on the road, it wernt easy ,i never expected it to be, Ive had to fight all my life, maybe that's why I'm so obnoxious to you lot ,i cant help that, when you have been beaten up, robed, and burned out, maybe you will realise why, but don't want your or any others sympathy i guess i thrive on strife as if that's what your used too then to expect any different reaction is a hard change to make but hey that's my problem ,for your info i know about a kiln and **** i worked in many jobs in my life once i worked in a big kiln drying hops not the same but it was a kiln.the principals the same the temperature ain't i admit but were not talking about kilns were talking jet fuel
Again...Firstly, you didn't start this thread, ITN did.when i started in this thread i was prepared to give you facts as i saw them, but you persisted with remarks like, "free fall" whats that i want proof .? thermite ignition caps det cord, you wanted me to provide proof of lots of things impossible ,without cut/pasting some things, to back up my theory's, but when i show these yet again you come back with your pathetic smileys pics, as if they proved anything ,only thing they proved to me was you did not like it, when i showed you some thing irrefutable, many times Ive proved you wrong, like about the plane, and **** but then you try a different tactic, and attack from another angle, you tell me how the hell I'm meant to provide evidence, without going to a web page, to substanciate my clams you tell me ,even you use them,to prove your claims and besides the web is a great place to find things of relevance
With all due respect Scratch, I didn't realise you were in the debate. Although I wouldn't call what quandary does...debate.
There are many aspects about the events of 9/11 that have left me wanting. Believe me, I need more proof to be fully convinced that somebody didn't see this coming.
But for all the hype and fan fair...in my humblest, educated and experienced opinion, the towers came down because two planes were flown into them. That does not remove the possibility that there may have been failsafe explosives in the buildings, (though I highly doubt it, explosives have a shelf life.).
But I've spoken to first hand eye witnesses, firemen and experts in the various fields involved. Their unanimous opinion is that the planes brought down the towers.
This of course does not remove the possibility that the events were allowed to happen to further an agenda. As I believe Pearl Harbour was allowed to happen for the same reasons.
So Scratch...if you have something that doesn't fly in the face of known, proven and verifiable science, please, by all means bring it on. I for one will not attack you.
Other then that, the bulk if not the entirety of what has been put forth is tripe.
You've got to be kidding...you are kidding right? 8OIn My Personal Humble Opinion and Without Prejudice
With all due respect to you CB,
I am going to tell you that I was watching the news at the exact time that this event occurred. My Lady friend was watching as well. We were on our way out to shoot pool and have a few brews.
As we watched, it was not in horror but almost in relief for neither one of us could have cared less because it was happening to America and we didn't even bother to watch the second plane hit.
We turned off the TV not giving a W5 about it. When we had made the rounds of the places that we usually frequented the consensus of the event was the same.....About damn time that the buggers finally got what was too long in coming...
So to answer your question, I have nothing to add because I didn't care then and I don't care now.
We just were sorry that they didn't hit the Pentagon correctly and missed the White House.
The less of them there are the better off we will all be.
First off...No we're talking about ground zero and the heat and fire still smoldering months after 9/11. The principal is the same as an airtight stove and a kiln.
It's as simple as that. If you aren't willing to prove me wrong, besides just saying I'm wrong...you're lost and so is your argument.
Secondly...As for having a ruff life...dude, you're preaching to the chior and you do not have a lock on misery around these parts.
Again...Firstly, you didn't start this thread, ITN did.
The sites I've used have no interest in 9/11. They are simply fact of point sites to prove what I have stated. The impartiality of them removes the bias each and every site you use.
You've only proven me incorrect on one point. That the design was meant to take the impact of a plane low on fuel on approach. I already conceded that. Conceding is what you do when you've been proven wrong. As in there is such a thing as an airtight wood burning stove.
Try using some unbiased sites to back up the science foisted by the sites you haunt.
Secondly...As for having a ruff life...dude, you're preaching to the chior and you do not have a lock on misery around these parts.
First off...No we're talking about ground zero and the heat and fire still smoldering months after 9/11. The principal is the same as an airtight stove and a kiln.
i have shown things to others about the fact that you would not need miles of det cord ,and when people say that the squibs are pressure building up and popping the windows that's B/S ,take a look again at the footage they can be seen going off all the way down some times two or three at a time,on different floors, if the pressure is released by the popping of a window, where does the pressure buildup start from when one window or so has already popped, also why would not the force of it escape from the the top of the building as it fell ,why was the concrete turned to a power, like a pyroclastic cloud and bone fragments found on roofs 1/4 of a mile away, explosions were heard from below as some of the recordings of eyewitness fire fighters testify, again why were no plane wreckage things in the pentagon attack found, why take all surrounding video tapes away why ...??????,to many whys m8 to many for this not to be a cover upIt's as simple as that. If you aren't willing to prove me wrong, besides just saying I'm wrong...you're lost and so is your argument.
Dude, I have a chip on my shoulder that weighs more then you, all I'm saying is, we all have crosses to bear and skeletons in our closets.like i said i ain't looking for sympathy drop it OK and never asked for it i just said thats why i dont take crap from no one
Says who?heat imaging cameras pictures were taken of the site these heat sources could not be accounted for
You would need more then a country mile of det cord. We used almost a kilometre just to run a face blast. The WTC is a shyte site bigger then a 20 foot drift face.i have shown things to others about the fact that you would not need miles of det cord ,and when people say that the squibs are pressure building up and popping the windows that's B/S ,take a look again at the footage they can be seen going off all the way down some times two or three at a time,on different floors, if the pressure is released by the popping of a window, where does the pressure buildup start from when one window or so has already popped, also why would not the force of it escape from the the top of the building as it fell ,why was the concrete turned to a power, like a pyroclastic cloud and bone fragments found on roofs 1/4 of a mile away, explosions were heard from below as some of the recordings of eyewitness fire fighters testify, again why were no plane wreckage things in the pentagon attack found, why take all surrounding video tapes away why ...??????,to many whys m8 to many for this not to be a cover up
I say it did. Hence why there were body and material parts on other structures.why would not the force of it escape from the the top of the building as it fell
where show me thats horse **** no footage of a plane has ever been shown verifyed or anything else your b/s usAs for the Pentagon...case closed, video footage showing a plane flying into it. Released within days of the attack.
where show me thats horse **** no footage of a plane has ever been shown verifyed or anything else your b/s us
You've got to be kidding...you are kidding right? 8O
you kunt did you read the video log no here it is for you dumb fuk
Pentagon 9-11 Surveilence Camera Video of Impact. Does not seem to indicate a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon. Doesn't show much of anything. Why won't they show us a 757 hitting the Pentagon? They have plenty of Surveillance Cameras surrounding the Pentagon. Why is this the only one made public? You decide.
no 757 it was b/s like your reasoning
911 pentagon video explanation - 3 of 3
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=wlygvqFLio8
Try this site and then try and dispute it http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1
this is the America you live in cndbear take a look at your beautiful country and kunts like you are the ones dressed in black
Only in America do we have freedom yeah right
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=6Cu1a23IIFY