I see... So the answer is to demand a result that is essentially impossible (ie life in Canada's far North without any fuel) with the threat that "We shan't forgive you" if this impossible result is not achieved.
How rational
What part of "is not that realistic" did you miss?
At this moment, if we focus on oil products, it is very, VERY hard to nix oil and it's influence out of our lives unless you do go to extreme measures.
HOWEVER...
Asking that the Government (or in this case, suing the Government) to do more to try and lessen our dependence on oil so we can shift those dependencies to something not as environmentally damaging is a viable solution.
The bonus of pushing implementation of such ideas, the jobs it'd create, etc, are all bonus off shoots.
Or let's not use oil, let's use something else; wood. We can keep harvesting our forests until there are none left (and replanting does NOT, in the end, help so much, if those same planted trees are taken too young), or we can grow other plants - like hemp - to replace such wood based products (and other products too) with less impact on the planet.
Government can push for better energy ideas, etc, etc...
All seems rational to me.
Do you say that because you have them yourself so often?
