yeah okKoine Greek if you want the spot on version. If your really want to know what a passage was intended to mean Strong's Concordance takes care of that.
yeah okKoine Greek if you want the spot on version. If your really want to know what a passage was intended to mean Strong's Concordance takes care of that.
Um, yeah. . . your wife.lol... say what?
Someone got served eh?
The King James Bible, introduced during the reign of King James VI and I in 1611 for the Church of England, which enabled ordinary people to be able to understand what was being read to them in church rather than having it read to them in Latin as the Catholic Church did, has been called"the most influential version of the most influential book in the world, in what is now its most influential language", "the most important book in English religion and culture", and "the most celebrated book in the English-speaking world". It has contributed 257 idioms to English, more than any other single
source, including Shakespeare; examples include "feet of clay" and "reap the whirlwind". Although the Authorized Version's former monopoly
in the English-speaking world has diminished – for example, the Church of England recommends six other versions in addition to it – it is still the most popular translation in the United States, especially among Evangelicals.
Having Evangelicals use it as their 'go to' for God isn't exactly a shining beacon of 'yay' for the book.
Um, yeah. . . your wife.
But the term is "serviced."
She's better than your mom, as you and your dad know.My wife? lol.... funny
She's better than your mom, as you and your dad know.
Just not by much.
Maybe I should try an EagleSmack argument.Walter must have really got under your skin to have you act like this!
Keep going so people can see what a fool you are.
I'm afraid I don't understand the question, Twila.
Maybe I should try an EagleSmack argument.
"I knew this guy once. . ."
I don't have as much experience with it as you have.What's the matter T? The 4th Grade playground behavior isn't working for you?
I don't have as much experience with it as you have.
Heh-heh.Awww T. Come on now. You're in the top 3 when it comes to immature, insecure trolls in here.
But I see you're skulking away now.
Although I would not say it is superior, it is closer to the original and therefore less adulterated. The OT goes back to the Sumerians and the Hindu Vedas (at least). The NT was not a chronicle of a man's life, but an allegory and metaphor for human spiritual development. The Catholic church were the original keepers of the original writings and are responsible for the thousands of changes, additions and omissions over a thousand years. Th authors of the KJV removed 13 books altogether. Any and all versions in use today are adulterated versions, especially that one you like to quote. None are "the written record".
Not sure what you think that means, but for me it is what I have been saying all along, "if you want to know the truth, go to the Source." The source is not written, it is experienced.The superior version is the living Word, Cliffy. The written word in any version points to Him.
What you see and experience in the smoke is amazing if you get some good shït.....What... going to the shaman isn't working anymore?
Exactly. And the Bible seems to be "good ****". heheWhat you see and experience in the smoke is amazing if you get some good shït.....