Why don't we treat climate change with the rigor we give to terror attacks?

[captain morgan]

Why not just err on the side of caution and reap the other pay offs? Reducing pollution is what it all amounts to and by that you are reducing waste too. At the same you can reduce your waistline! It's all good.

You still refuse to answer the question of all of Australia is wrong and completely unscientific.

Also, carbon is not considered pollution any more than nitrogen or oxygen

 

[Jinentonix]

Wait.

You think that human induced climate change isn't real?

What century are you in?

Wait, you think the end of the LIA wouldn't cause temps to start warming? What colour is the sky in your world?
Why was it warmer 2500 years ago than it is today? Hell, why was it warmer just 1000 years ago than it is today?

 

[petros]

Warmer 500 years ago. Was it Columbus reaching the Americas that induced the maunder?

 

[taxslave]

Wait.

You think that human induced climate change isn't real?

What century are you in?

We know it isn't real. Even the promoters like suzuki and gore know it isn't real. They are in it for the money. It is just a few gullible suckers that believe it.

 

[B00Mer]

www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nSGJ7EMMiI

 

[mentalfloss]

1500AD when it was 1.5C warmer than today?

How does the Medieval Warm Period compare to current global temperatures?

 

[petros]

How does the Medieval Warm Period compare to current global temperatures?

While the Medieval Warm Period saw unusually warm temperatures in some regions, globally the planet was cooler than current conditions.

Climate Myth...
Medieval Warm Period was warmer
The Medieval Warm Period was warmer than current conditions. This means recent warming is not unusual and hence must be natural, not man-made.
One of the most often cited arguments of those skeptical of global warming is that the Medieval Warm Period (800-1400 AD) was as warm as or warmer than today. Using this as proof to say that we cannot be causing current warming is a faulty notion based upon rhetoric rather than science. So what are the holes in this line of thinking?

Firstly, evidence suggests that the Medieval Warm Period may have been warmer than today in many parts of the globe such as in the North Atlantic. This warming thereby allowed Vikings to travel further north than had been previously possible because of reductions in sea ice and land ice in the Arctic. However, evidence also suggests that some places were very much cooler than today including the tropical pacific. All in all, when the warm places are averaged out with the cool places, it becomes clear that the overall warmth was likely similar to early to mid 20th century warming

Tbe same is happening right now.

 

[mentalfloss]

While the Medieval Warm Period saw unusually warm temperatures in some regions, globally the planet was cooler than current conditions.

 

[petros]

And yet it was warmer than today GLOBALLY


Curreny Antarctic is 0.7 warmer than the Arctic....

 

[EagleSmack]

Climate Change.... White people problem

 

[coldstream]

Why don't we treat climate change with the rigor we give to terror
attacks?

The FACT that is an obvious fraud.. a political and philosophical agenda that has not an ounce of scientific merit.. and in fact represents a pernicious cult deeply antagonistic to the human cause.. might be one of the reasons.

In fact this quasi spirituality has become increasing desperate and outrageous in its claims as its predictions and pseudo science fall apart.

 

[Bar Sinister]

Why don't we treat climate change with the rigor we give to terror attacks? | Ruth Greenspan Bell | Opinion | The Guardian

Answer; because human induced climate change is a myth... That and the only proposed solutions are a bevy of taxes to be imposed as if money transfers will change anything other than the balance in your bank account

Great reply. Once again you have posted a perfect example of your utter ignorance.

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

You still refuse to answer the question of all of Australia is wrong and completely unscientific.

Dude, they drink 25-ounce beers. Of course they're wrong. A couple of those oilcans and you couldn't count your thumbs accurately.

 

[JLM]

Great reply. Once again you have posted a perfect example of your utter ignorance.

Does that surprise you?

Dude, they drink 25-ounce beers. Of course they're wrong. A couple of those oilcans and you couldn't count your thumbs accurately.

Good one Bones!

 

[darkbeaver]

We know it isn't real. Even the promoters like suzuki and gore know it isn't real. They are in it for the money. It is just a few gullible suckers that believe it.

You're a run of the mill conspiracy nut complete with tinfoil earmuffs.

 

[JLM]

Maybe there's one way to deal with this "Climate Change"...................Question the validity but act as though it's true!

 

[Ludlow]

Humans will cause an adverse effect on nature. Especially as the population explodes. All you have to do is look up at the sky over a large city to see that. Doesn't take a scientist. We reproduce like locusts and devour everything in our path. LOL. So if you can do two things, teach people to stop being gluttons,,,and stop fukking, you may get a good handle on solving this environmental infection. .

 

[JLM]

Humans will cause an adverse effect on nature. Especially as the population explodes. All you have to do is look up at the sky over a large city to see that. Doesn't take a scientist. We reproduce like locusts and devour everything in our path. LOL. So if you can do two things, teach people to stop being gluttons,,,and stop fukking, you may get a good handle on solving this environmental infection. .

I think you have it pegged in a nutshell! (Is there a pun in there?)

 

[mentalfloss]

Great reply. Once again you have posted a perfect example of your utter ignorance.

Oh he's not ignorant.

He's a shill but not ignorant.

 

[petros]

What time do you go for cognitive OT?