WE really need to get rid of this guy

taxme

Time Out
Feb 11, 2020
2,349
976
113

Conservatives....white men....rednecks and blueberry farmers?

Liberals, socialists, communists, environ'mental'ists and pot growers and pot users are the bloody fkn problem and not the solution. We need more real and true white conservatives in the government otherwise this Marxist revolutionist in Ottawa will finish off the old Canada that we all once knew, loved and enjoyed and send Canada down the WEF globalist tyranny of despotism and slavery path. We are seeing today as to what real WEF globalist communism is all about. Want more of the same then vote for the liberals and socialists in the next Canadian federal election back in power. It's your call, mac. :unsure:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dixie Cup

taxme

Time Out
Feb 11, 2020
2,349
976
113
You dont like Hindus who are Conservatives?
You dont like Hindus who are Conservatives?

Do you not like white conservatives? I do not have any problem with anyone being a real and true conservative. I only have a problem with those liberal/socialist arse holes out there who keep phukin up this once great country with their liberal/socialist madness.

So, be honest with me here if that is possible for you to do? Are you a liberal or socialist or conservative? Just asking.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,362
12,821
113
Low Earth Orbit
Do you not like white conservatives? I do not have any problem with anyone being a real and true conservative. I only have a problem with those liberal/socialist arse holes out there who keep phukin up this once great country with their liberal/socialist madness.

So, be honest with me here if that is possible for you to do? Are you a liberal or socialist or conservative? Just asking.
Do you repeat yourself when under stress?
 

taxme

Time Out
Feb 11, 2020
2,349
976
113
Do you repeat yourself when under stress?

No stress involved here. Just enjoying having plenty of fun with all the lefty liberal and socialist losers here. I guess that I must be stressing you out because you cannot even tell me as to whether you are a lefty lieberal or socialist? Go take an Aspirin and go to bed for a couple of weeks. Doctor Taxme's suggestion. LOL.

Anyway, so you pretty much have just told me that you are either a lefty liberal or a socialist. Not much difference anyway between the two buffoons. I just wish that you had the balls enough to tell me. You know that I am a conservative. So, why are you so scared and afraid to do the same? I guess lefty liberals or socialists are like that. Cowards beyond repair. Beep-beep. (n)
 

taxme

Time Out
Feb 11, 2020
2,349
976
113
You quoted it.

I quote a lot of things, lefty. So, come on, man, when are you ever going to be and act like a real man for a change and own up as to what you are in the political arena and scheme of things. Sorry, if I offended you by calling you a man. Maybe you are one of those all mixed up in the head me/he/they/her/she/him or neutral transgender people, right lefty? Forget it, I am not sorry. :p

I just so despise lefty liberal cowards like you. Although, I do believe that you would make a great lefty liberal or socialist politician. Never say yes or never say no. Just answer some question with some useless confusing babble. :eek:
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
26,234
9,597
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
A little humility can go a long way, especially for those of us in places of leadership. Sadly, this conviction is seemingly absent in the Liberal government.

Tragically, it has become the habit of Liberal MPs to categorize anyone who disagrees with them as racist, misogynist, or even a Nazi.

You will likely recall that we found ourselves thrust into an unnecessary election this time last year. From day one, the Prime Minister’s strategy was to divide Canadians, stigmatize anyone who failed to hold his ideals, and pit regions of our country against each other.


With malice in his voice, he outlandishly labelled all unvaccinated Canadians “misogynists and racist.” He questioned whether we should “tolerate these people” as if they were of lesser value.

In addition to routinely attaching the most heinous labels to people with whom they disagree, the Trudeau Liberals are obsessed with regulating speech. There are three separate pieces of legislation on the books for this year, which would censor what Canadians can see, hear, and say online: Bill C-11, Bill C-18, and a forthcoming online harms bill.

The Liberal government sees itself as the moral authority on speech. The irony, of course, is that they are some of the worst perpetrators of using distasteful language, inciting hate, and spreading misinformation.


There could not be a clearer example than the recent situation wherein the Canadian Heritage department hired a raging anti-Semite to provide anti-racism training for Canadian broadcasters. Laith Marouf is a senior consultant with the Community Media Advocacy Centre (CMAC), to whom the government awarded a $133,000 contract (paid with Canadian tax dollars) to conduct training sessions on hate speech.

What is unfathomable is the fact that Marouf somehow made it past the Liberal government’s vetting process—assuming there was one. A few minutes on his Twitter feed would have revealed a whole host of the most abhorrent anti-Semitic statements and racist slurs one could imagine.


When the story started gaining traction, it was expected that Pablo Rodriguez, the Minister of Canadian Heritage, would issue some type of explanation and apology for this egregious incident. After a week of deafening silence, I decided to write a letter to the minister pointing out the hypocrisy of his government’s virtue-signalling and the fact that he had yet to make a statement on the hiring of Marouf, for which his department was responsible.

To my surprise, his office responded by shirking responsibility and redirecting me to a different minister. This is an example of Liberal tactic 101: avoid and evade any accountability.

I know everyone makes mistakes. Awarding a contract to a racist to teach Canadian broadcasters about anti-racism could be classified as one of the worst.


The issue I take now is the utter silence coming from the Liberal caucus as whole. This is not about Conservatives vs. Liberals; this is about right vs. wrong.

Anthony Housefather, who is a Jewish Liberal MP, is the only clear exception. To his credit, he has been extremely vocal on this matter from the beginning. He even pointed out Marouf’s troubling conduct weeks before the story broke, but nothing was done. Housefather later tweeted, “There is a feeling in my community that antisemitism is tolerated more than other forms of hate in North America today.”

Holocaust survivor Eie Wiesel famously wrote, “We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented. Sometimes we must interfere.”


The fact that there was an anti-Semite spewing hate from his social media pages while representing the Canadian government is reprehensible. The fact that the Heritage Minister has failed to take account and offer an apology is even worse.

And remember, this is the same minister who is responsible for three pieces of legislation targeted at regulating the speech of Canadians.
The hypocrisy could not be more obvious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dixie Cup

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
27,716
7,542
113
B.C.
A little humility can go a long way, especially for those of us in places of leadership. Sadly, this conviction is seemingly absent in the Liberal government.

Tragically, it has become the habit of Liberal MPs to categorize anyone who disagrees with them as racist, misogynist, or even a Nazi.

You will likely recall that we found ourselves thrust into an unnecessary election this time last year. From day one, the Prime Minister’s strategy was to divide Canadians, stigmatize anyone who failed to hold his ideals, and pit regions of our country against each other.


With malice in his voice, he outlandishly labelled all unvaccinated Canadians “misogynists and racist.” He questioned whether we should “tolerate these people” as if they were of lesser value.

In addition to routinely attaching the most heinous labels to people with whom they disagree, the Trudeau Liberals are obsessed with regulating speech. There are three separate pieces of legislation on the books for this year, which would censor what Canadians can see, hear, and say online: Bill C-11, Bill C-18, and a forthcoming online harms bill.

The Liberal government sees itself as the moral authority on speech. The irony, of course, is that they are some of the worst perpetrators of using distasteful language, inciting hate, and spreading misinformation.


There could not be a clearer example than the recent situation wherein the Canadian Heritage department hired a raging anti-Semite to provide anti-racism training for Canadian broadcasters. Laith Marouf is a senior consultant with the Community Media Advocacy Centre (CMAC), to whom the government awarded a $133,000 contract (paid with Canadian tax dollars) to conduct training sessions on hate speech.

What is unfathomable is the fact that Marouf somehow made it past the Liberal government’s vetting process—assuming there was one. A few minutes on his Twitter feed would have revealed a whole host of the most abhorrent anti-Semitic statements and racist slurs one could imagine.


When the story started gaining traction, it was expected that Pablo Rodriguez, the Minister of Canadian Heritage, would issue some type of explanation and apology for this egregious incident. After a week of deafening silence, I decided to write a letter to the minister pointing out the hypocrisy of his government’s virtue-signalling and the fact that he had yet to make a statement on the hiring of Marouf, for which his department was responsible.

To my surprise, his office responded by shirking responsibility and redirecting me to a different minister. This is an example of Liberal tactic 101: avoid and evade any accountability.

I know everyone makes mistakes. Awarding a contract to a racist to teach Canadian broadcasters about anti-racism could be classified as one of the worst.


The issue I take now is the utter silence coming from the Liberal caucus as whole. This is not about Conservatives vs. Liberals; this is about right vs. wrong.

Anthony Housefather, who is a Jewish Liberal MP, is the only clear exception. To his credit, he has been extremely vocal on this matter from the beginning. He even pointed out Marouf’s troubling conduct weeks before the story broke, but nothing was done. Housefather later tweeted, “There is a feeling in my community that antisemitism is tolerated more than other forms of hate in North America today.”

Holocaust survivor Eie Wiesel famously wrote, “We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented. Sometimes we must interfere.”


The fact that there was an anti-Semite spewing hate from his social media pages while representing the Canadian government is reprehensible. The fact that the Heritage Minister has failed to take account and offer an apology is even worse.

And remember, this is the same minister who is responsible for three pieces of legislation targeted at regulating the speech of Canadians.
The hypocrisy could not be more obvious.
The religion of peace is in favour with the present government . Funny the guy keeping them there wears a knife as the last resort from submitting to that ideology .
 

The_Foxer

House Member
Aug 9, 2022
3,084
1,839
113
“There is a feeling in my community that antisemitism is tolerated more than other forms of hate in North America today.”
It's something that's been showing up on the left in the USA as well. I have no idea how that makes any sense, why those who are further to the left would somehow think this is ok or where this antisemitism comes from. But there can be little doubt this isn't the first time the Trudeau liberals have shown their colours in that respect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dixie Cup

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
27,716
7,542
113
B.C.
It's something that's been showing up on the left in the USA as well. I have no idea how that makes any sense, why those who are further to the left would somehow think this is ok or where this antisemitism comes from. But there can be little doubt this isn't the first time the Trudeau liberals have shown their colours in that respect.
The ghetto communities vote Liberal , look at the diversity .
 

Rosebud

Nominee Member
Feb 6, 2012
73
5
8
Meanwhile where is that $900 million that was going to be distributed to all those kids through the Canada Student Service Grant program?

Oh that's right.

The Bloc and the Conservatives have managed to prevent that from happening because they are busy running for reelection.

Priorities.
A few years ago a 9 Billion bailout by Canadians to GM Canada for what again....Anyone?........(crickets chirping) 40000000 Canadains Pheww, do the math, and don't even exclude the infants.
 

The_Foxer

House Member
Aug 9, 2022
3,084
1,839
113
The ghetto communities vote Liberal , look at the diversity .
It's not just the libs tho, it's many on the left which includes the ndp. The Green party basically blew up like a nuke over the idea that their leader shouldn't call for the destruction of isreal. It's not really a left wing ideology traditionally... is it an authoritarian thing to just hate jews instinctively? Stalin wanted them gone, (the pogroms) and hitler obviously wasn't a fan, now the modern authortarian left has taken a dislike to them en masse. What the hell is up with that?
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
26,234
9,597
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
As the Conservative leadership campaign approaches what now seems certain to be Pierre Poilievre’s coronation, progressives (?) are unnerved by the huge crowds of all ages he is attracting across the country, which point to an expanding Conservative base.

Predictably, the Laurentian elite and their media loyalists have dissolved into full-blown derangement syndrome, while providing cover for Liberal missteps. Intriguingly, they are less protective of an increasingly unpopular prime minister.

The conventional wisdom that Poilievre cannot win a national election is wearing thin. Inflation, which people intuitively understand was created and exacerbated by government profligacy, is the public’s top concern.

There is also widespread frustration with the government’s maddening incompetence and multiple ministerial missteps: Omar Alghabra for the airport debacles, Marco Mendicino, for misleading Parliament about the Emergencies Act, Karina Gould for mind-boggling passport delays, Mélanie Joly for an official inexplicably attending a Russian diplomatic party, Ahmed Hussen and Pablo Rodriguez for the Marouf scandal, Chrystia Freeland for favouring out-of-control spending over growth.

The prime minister’s charisma has faded with his team’s eroding credibility. Moreover, even die-hard Liberals are disillusioned by his own divisive tactics, hypocritical virtue-signalling, inability to deliver on priorities, tarnished brand abroad and, perhaps most important for them, 50 per cent disapproval rating.


The government is notoriously selective about treating people differently depending on their race, ethnic group, gender identity, sexual preference, age or country of origin. The most obvious case in point is that despite Laith Marouf’s appallingly bigoted and anti-semitic comments he was paid half a million public dollars to provide anti-racism advice.

The absence of even elementary due diligence is inexcusable.

Worse, it took over a month for the responsible minister to act and even longer for the prime minister to comment, no doubt in part because he did not want to own up to his ministry’s incompetence but perhaps also because Marouf hypocritically presented himself as a supposed ally in its core mission.

Had a racial minority or Aboriginal person been called a bag of feces or threatened with a bullet to the head the PM would quite rightly have expressed outrage, likely in minutes. He was appropriately quick off the mark when Chrystia Freeland was subject to unacceptable verbal harassment. Which makes the delayed reaction from the government and many in the media in the Marouf case even more disconcerting. The Jewish community is understandably disheartened by the blatant double standard. As a matter of basic decency, not to mention fundamental philosophical principle, governments should treat people equally and not discriminate based on twisted notions about identity or victimhood politics.

Pierre Poilievre clearly understands the widespread and growing anger about the disdain, condescension and snobbery a progressive elite have for working and lower middle-class Canadians. He empathizes with resentment about nanny-state intrusions, the politicization of science and the often bizarre ideas of left-wing ideologues, woke capitalists and “expert” academics. He agrees with people who rail against a government that allows faceless bureaucrats to infringe on their agency, curtail their freedom and damage their standard of living with heavy taxes and burdensome regulations.

Critics are torn between claiming Pierre Poilievre has no policies and denouncing these non-policies as extreme. He is decried as a populist because he seeks public support (as if the Liberal default position on just about everything is not to swing with public opinion). The “Trump North” label has failed to stick because he has been consistently pro-choice, supports gay marriage and favours immigration.

Liberals loath Pierre Poilievre because they fear he will dismantle excessive government intervention in society and the economy, reverse tax-and-spend policies, encourage natural resource development, defend free speech and genuine diversity of opinion, decry woke-ism, defund the CBC and undercut elite influence. Sounds like a real bastard….

But it is Pierre Poilievre, not Justin Trudeau, who reflects mainstream Canadian thinking about fundamental issues. He believes profoundly in personal freedom and is proud of our history. In contrast, Trudeau has called Canada systemically racist and guilty of genocide. He proclaimed it the world’s first “post-national” state and declared “There is no core identity, no mainstream in Canada.” His far-left thinking manifests itself in a profligate government that creates more problems than it solves.

Trudeau’s cultish climate obsession has wrought enormous harm to jobs, growth, national unity and the economic prospects of Indigenous peoples. Yet it has not achieved a single national GHG target or impacted global warming even minutely — something that actually could be achieved if Canadian LNG replaced coal in energy-hungry Asia and Europe.

I expect Pierre Poilievre will reach out to his leadership rivals and their supporters the way Stephen Harper did as prime minister. He can easily do that without compromising conservative principles, policy priorities or authenticity. It would be the magnanimous and smart thing to do. He will then speak directly to Canadians about how he will represent their values and interests and pursue his vision for a prosperous, proud and fair country for everyone. No wonder Liberals are worried.
 

The_Foxer

House Member
Aug 9, 2022
3,084
1,839
113
Pogroms were Tsarist Russia but thats ok.
Tsarist Russia is where it started and i guess in fairness they were a pretty authoritarian group too so chalk one up for the 'authoritarian' argument, but Stalin had his as well, if somewhat less 'official', such as the doctors plot - a plan to accuse a craptonne of prominent Jewish doctors of trying to kill the politicians and use that as an excuse to wipe them out. Totally fake, there was no such plot.

Btw - pogrom refers to pretty much any repression or slaughter of ethnic group endorsed or initiated by an authority. The Holacaust is sometimes referred to as a pogrom. But that's ok. :)

Bottom line it seems like most left wing groups (and authortarian groups like the nazi's and czars) seem to instinctively have it out for the jews. And i wouldn't know why.