“We Are Going To Have To Kill A Lot Of Whites”
- Thread starter Locutus
- Start date
Re: Department of Homeland Security employee found running racist website, put on adm
Equal-opportunity racist...............
Equal-opportunity racist...............
more about barry the mutt:
“Mulatto Faggot”
Guess he wouldn’t be getting that promotion...
Via John Sexton:
“Mulatto Faggot”
Guess he wouldn’t be getting that promotion...
Via John Sexton:
As revealed this week, ICE employee Ayo Kimathi runs a website called ”War on the Horizon” which predicts a coming race war between blacks and whites.
Using the name Irritated Genie, Kimathi also has a You Tube account in which he presents videos of himself ranting on various topics. One of these clips, uploaded
last May
, is an anti-gay rant aimed at President Obama. Kimathi refers to President Obama as a “mulatto f–got” and then repeats the word a dozen more times
Using the name Irritated Genie, Kimathi also has a You Tube account in which he presents videos of himself ranting on various topics. One of these clips, uploaded
last May
, is an anti-gay rant aimed at President Obama. Kimathi refers to President Obama as a “mulatto f–got” and then repeats the word a dozen more times
well he ain't so dark himself, so I'm thinking he needs a DNA break down so he can see how much white runs through his veins...he is actually gorgeous looking, but then bad things come in nicely wrapped packages at times.
Re: Department of Homeland Security employee found running racist website, put on adm
I wonder if they're happy or upset about that.
So, exactly what our white-wing racists wanted to happen has happened.
I wonder if they're happy or upset about that.
“There are white ******s. I've seen a lot of white ******s in my time.”
Robert Byrd, 2001-03-04
“The Klan is needed today as never before, and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia.”
Robert Byrd, 1946-00-00
“I shall never fight in the armed forces with a Negro by my side ... Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds.”
Robert Byrd, 1945-12-11
Boy oh boy! What's a democrat to do when one of their beloved is identified.
“There are white ******s. I've seen a lot of white ******s in my time.”
Robert Byrd, 2001-03-04
“The Klan is needed today as never before, and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia.”
Robert Byrd, 1946-00-00
“I shall never fight in the armed forces with a Negro by my side ... Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds.”
Robert Byrd, 1945-12-11
Boy oh boy! What's a democrat to do when one of their beloved is identified.
Yep. People can change. I presume you can't, given your demonstrated propensity to reach back 70 years to justify your hate.
My hate? I was never a member of the Klan. Never stepped out in front of news media to decry about a little black girl going to a white school. He was a scumbag then and he died a scumbag. If he died a Republican. people such as yourself would not hold such forgiveness in your heart, but he was a democrat so he gets a pass. You're an idiot hypocrite who generalizes when it suits you.
Free speech in the US is much different than Canada.
Incitement is the critical factor.
Hate Speech Cases - List of Supreme Court Hate Speech Cases
Virginia v. Black (2003)
11 years after the St. Paul case, the U.S. Supreme Court revisited the issue of cross-burning after three people were arrested separately for violating a Virginia ban. In a 5-4 ruling written by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the Supreme Court held that while cross-burning may constitute illegal intimidation in some cases, a ban on the public burning of crosses would violate the First Amendment. "[A] State may choose to prohibit only those forms of intimidation," Justice O'Connor wrote, "that are most likely to inspire fear of bodily harm."
National Socialist Party v. Skokie (1977)
When the National Socialist Party of America was declined a permit to speak in Chicago, the organizers turned to the small, ethnically Jewish town of Skokie—where 1/6th of the Jewish population was made up of families that had survived the Holocaust. County authorities attempted to block the Nazi march, but their efforts were overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court in a terse ruling. After the ruling, the city of Chicago granted the Nazis three permits to march; the Nazis, in turn, decided to cancel their plans to march in Skokie.
Hate speech - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Traditionally, however, if the speech did not fall within one of the above categorical exceptions, it was protected speech. In 1969, the Supreme Court protected a Ku Klux Klan member’s racist and hate filled speech and created the ‘imminent danger’ test to permit hate speech. The court ruled in Brandenburg v. Ohio that; "The constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a state to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force, or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action."[57]
This test has been modified very little from its inception in 1969 and the formulation is still good law in the US. Only speech that poses an imminent danger of unlawful action, where the speaker has the intention to incite such action and there is the likelihood that this will be the consequence of his or her speech, may be restricted and punished by that law.
Incitement is the critical factor.
Hate Speech Cases - List of Supreme Court Hate Speech Cases
Virginia v. Black (2003)
11 years after the St. Paul case, the U.S. Supreme Court revisited the issue of cross-burning after three people were arrested separately for violating a Virginia ban. In a 5-4 ruling written by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the Supreme Court held that while cross-burning may constitute illegal intimidation in some cases, a ban on the public burning of crosses would violate the First Amendment. "[A] State may choose to prohibit only those forms of intimidation," Justice O'Connor wrote, "that are most likely to inspire fear of bodily harm."
National Socialist Party v. Skokie (1977)
When the National Socialist Party of America was declined a permit to speak in Chicago, the organizers turned to the small, ethnically Jewish town of Skokie—where 1/6th of the Jewish population was made up of families that had survived the Holocaust. County authorities attempted to block the Nazi march, but their efforts were overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court in a terse ruling. After the ruling, the city of Chicago granted the Nazis three permits to march; the Nazis, in turn, decided to cancel their plans to march in Skokie.
Hate speech - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Traditionally, however, if the speech did not fall within one of the above categorical exceptions, it was protected speech. In 1969, the Supreme Court protected a Ku Klux Klan member’s racist and hate filled speech and created the ‘imminent danger’ test to permit hate speech. The court ruled in Brandenburg v. Ohio that; "The constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a state to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force, or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action."[57]
This test has been modified very little from its inception in 1969 and the formulation is still good law in the US. Only speech that poses an imminent danger of unlawful action, where the speaker has the intention to incite such action and there is the likelihood that this will be the consequence of his or her speech, may be restricted and punished by that law.
It must be why DHS bought 1.6 Billion rounds of ammo. Hollow point to boot. Not to mention a whole whack of MaxxPro MRAP vehicles for service on the streets of the United States
1.6 Billion Rounds Of Ammo For Homeland Security? It's Time For A National Conversation - Forbes
All you have to do is vote and it all goes away. Right?
1.6 Billion Rounds Of Ammo For Homeland Security? It's Time For A National Conversation - Forbes
All you have to do is vote and it all goes away. Right?
You know you can swallow it any time. We all feel sort of embarrassed for you with it dribbling down your chin like that.
No actually, I said you are an idiot hypocrite.
Regardless of where one stands on the political spectrum this is totally unacceptable.
Worse than this person being an employee of government the fact the department
of Homeland Security didn't even check this site out before approving it begs the
question what else have they approved without scrutiny? There has to be something
done about this to determine the State of preparedness and is the government up to
speed on what is really happening. Speculation and doubt are a nation's worst and I
mean worst enemies.
Worse than this person being an employee of government the fact the department
of Homeland Security didn't even check this site out before approving it begs the
question what else have they approved without scrutiny? There has to be something
done about this to determine the State of preparedness and is the government up to
speed on what is really happening. Speculation and doubt are a nation's worst and I
mean worst enemies.
Hmm, I guess a flame war is more important? Good luck flaming when the sh*t and tyranny really hit the fan.
DHS employee behind website promoting race war on paid leave
The Department of Homeland Security said Friday that an employee who runs a racist website predicting and advocating a race war has been put on paid administrative leave.
Ayo Kimathi, an acquisitions officer for Immigration and Customs Enforcement who is in charge of buying weapons and ammunition for the government, operates the website named "War on the Horizon." It includes descriptions of an "unavoidable, inevitable clash with the white race." Kimathi is black.
Kimathi, who calls himself the "Irritated Genie," told his supervisors that the website was set up to sell concert and lecture videos.
Kimathi has been with the department since 2009. His website criticizes whites, gays, those of mixed race, and blacks who integrate with whites. The Southern Poverty Law Center, which monitors hate groups, earlier this week reported on Kimathi's role in running the site.
more
DHS employee behind website promoting race war on paid leave | Fox News
The Department of Homeland Security said Friday that an employee who runs a racist website predicting and advocating a race war has been put on paid administrative leave.
Ayo Kimathi, an acquisitions officer for Immigration and Customs Enforcement who is in charge of buying weapons and ammunition for the government, operates the website named "War on the Horizon." It includes descriptions of an "unavoidable, inevitable clash with the white race." Kimathi is black.
Kimathi, who calls himself the "Irritated Genie," told his supervisors that the website was set up to sell concert and lecture videos.
Kimathi has been with the department since 2009. His website criticizes whites, gays, those of mixed race, and blacks who integrate with whites. The Southern Poverty Law Center, which monitors hate groups, earlier this week reported on Kimathi's role in running the site.
more
DHS employee behind website promoting race war on paid leave | Fox News
"Blackface"? Like the ol vaudevillians used to use ????
Ted Bundy was described as handsome from time to time. He just looked that way. eh !
He didn't say anything bout whites integrating with black women. Tha's probably ok as long as their slaves or whatnot...........
Or possibly because disciplining or firing a Federal employee is a tricky matter. Generally, the Federal government may not discriminate for or against a civil service employee for the employee's political beliefs. But, the Federal government, as an employer, may require certain conduct, just as a private employer can. The paid leave is to give the lawyers time to work out (and construct arguments for) whether the government in this case has the power to discipline or fire the employee based on his political positions.