War Crimes Tribunal: tries Bush & Blair

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
What criminal acts did they commit against their own citizens? Maybe the ones who did should be dealt with first. Not much use killing flies while rats are running rampant! :smile:

You are relying on the phrase: " crimes against their own citizens. " That is not the issue. The issue is WAR CRIMES......crimes committed on another nations population by CHOICE and elective design........ NOT true necessity or true self defense.

It is not a stretch to say that the bush regime committed crimes against its own troops by sending them to die for a lie and your garden variety greed ( greed for more influence in the region, more control or influence over the resources in that region )

Now........that brings us to TORTURE........ there is NO rational jusfication for that kind of barbarism...... and there is no point in splitting hairs about what is torture and what is not. a nation that tortures will find excuses for its conduct and convince others that it is ok.....particularly if spun as a national security defense.

Yet these acts are crimes of war and if anyone else did them.........the empire would be hysterical in its condemnation. Hypocracy is not a war crime , but a major character flaw.

we have not touched the rapes that occurred under bush's war , how families were slaughtered to silence them. etc etc. Yes, some of these troops were brought to justice as they should have been. But the damage done was about a lot more than some nastiness like rape and murder. They speak to the leadership that sent them there. It speaks to a nation that has gone almost rogue.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
How many people died as a result of Mugabe's actions? I am aware this tyrant has a shameful Human Rights record, but when it comes to mass murder, Mugabe doesn't come close to Bush and Blair.

Who did Bush and Blair murder?

You are relying on the phrase: " crimes against their own citizens. " That is not the issue. The issue is WAR CRIMES......crimes committed on another nations population by CHOICE and elective design........ NOT true necessity or true self defense.

It is not a stretch to say that the bush regime committed crimes against its own troops by sending them to die for a lie and your garden variety greed ( greed for more influence in the region, more control or influence over the resources in that region )

Now........that brings us to TORTURE........ there is NO rational jusfication for that kind of barbarism...... and there is no point in splitting hairs about what is torture and what is not. a nation that tortures will find excuses for its conduct and convince others that it is ok.....particularly if spun as a national security defense.

Yet these acts are crimes of war and if anyone else did them.........the empire would be hysterical in its condemnation. Hypocracy is not a war crime , but a major character flaw.

we have not touched the rapes that occurred under bush's war , how families were slaughtered to silence them. etc etc. Yes, some of these troops were brought to justice as they should have been. But the damage done was about a lot more than some nastiness like rape and murder. They speak to the leadership that sent them there. It speaks to a nation that has gone almost rogue.

Well, since it's so "cut and dried" go down to your local constabulary and file the charges against them...............don't sit around waiting for someone else to do it!
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
Who did Bush and Blair murder?

wrong question. the question is who did they slaughter en masse via their WAR initiative . If one needs to be literal about it....then one can say who did bush/blair order the troops to kill??? If you are going to use that to defend bushblair........then ask yourself WHO DID Sadam H murder ??? Implication being doing the dastardly deed themselves.

Who did Bush and Blair murder?



Well, since it's so "cut and dried" go down to your local constabulary and file the charges against them...............don't sit around waiting for someone else to do it!

Please explain why you defend these guys . Please explain how you can justify the inhumanity of their actions.

thanks.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
How many people died as a result of Mugabe's actions? I am aware this tyrant has a shameful Human Rights record, but when it comes to mass murder, Mugabe doesn't come close to Bush and Blair.

Source Iraqi casualties Time period
Iraq Family Health Survey
151,000 deaths March 2003 to June 2006
Lancet survey 601,027 violent deaths out of 654,965 excess deaths March 2003 to June 2006
Opinion Research Business survey 1,033,000 deaths as a result of the conflict March 2003 to August 2007
Associated Press 110,600 deaths March 2003 to April 2009
Iraq Body Count project 103,536 — 113,125 civilian deaths as a result of the conflict. Over 150,726 civilian and combatant deaths[1] March 2003 to October 2011
WikiLeaks. Classified Iraq war logs[1][2][3][4] 109,032 deaths including 66,081 civilian deaths.[5][6] January 2004 to December 2009

Find the cost of Freedom

Buried in the Ground......

(with apologies to CSN).

wrong question. the question is who did they slaughter en masse via their WAR initiative . If one needs to be literal about it....then one can say who did bush/blair order the troops to kill??? If you are going to use that to defend bushblair........then ask yourself WHO DID Sadam H murder ??? Implication being doing the dastardly deed themselves.



Please explain why you defend these guys . Please explain how you can justify the inhumanity of their actions.

thanks.

Saddam murdered approximately 300,000 of his own people.

Saddam was an Arab Hitler, with aspirations of leading a larger Arab state....

Iraq is now a democracy.

Give it a break.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Please explain why you defend these guys . Please explain how you can justify the inhumanity of their actions.

thanks.

I'm not defending these guys, I can't prove one way or the other if they murdered anyone. Who did Churchill murder? Who did Black Jack Pershing murder, who did Bernie Montgomery murder? All I know Bush did exactly what he said he was going to do after 9/11, hunt down and eliminate terrorists. War is the sh*ts but it is what it is, people die, so other people can live. Is it fair? I don't know.

Find the cost of Freedom

Buried in the Ground......

(with apologies to CSN).



Saddam murdered approximately 300,000 of his own people.

Saddam was an Arab Hitler, with aspirations of leading a larger Arab state....

Iraq is now a democracy.

Give it a break.

Reported at between one and two million over a period of 30 years.
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
people die, so other people can live.

that is NOT what war is about. and even that is irrational. War is about profit, power and domination.

SH atrocities did not concern the empire on any level until he decided to change the Iraqi currency. But that was only one of the triggers for the bush LIES.

The invasion was not about the inhumanity that went on there. It was about some phantom massive stockpiles of WMD that SH could launch against the over militarized america. He spun that into a threat so the feeble minded sheeple would buy into it. And it worked.

Mind you......the reason for the war changed more often than some change their underwear....until they came up with "democracizing" or "freeing" the Iraqis from a despot leader. And even THAT was not the truth.

Maybe if they had not lied so many times, spun the information to suit their agenda to the point no one really knew the true reason bush ordered the invasion ........and had said from the onset that the crimes against humanity by SH 's regime against the Iraqis , it might have made some rational sense.

Of course we can't over look that georgie boy had a personal vendetta grudge against SH......but also being an oil man......had a vested interest in helping the US oil companies......of which Cheney was an influential figure.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
I'm interested in this story even if you aren't.
Thank you OB.

While a guilty finding only has symbolic meaning, it also means Malaysia will now off limits to these former heads of state aka war criminals. If most UN countries did the same thing, these war criminals travel plans would be severely restricted.

Only in your (small) mind

Where are they getting the evidence from?

Who needs evidence when you know you are right because you read it in some lefty blog?
Hard to believe that people that managed to get enough education to operate a computer can still be that stupid and gullible. Not even bright enough to be considered trolls. Funny though.
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
Only in your (small) mind

astonishing that the big minds (self proclaimed ) are in favor of war criminals. and crimes. OR are selective about who should be tried for same. Seems that the laws apply to everyone. No matter what your bias is.

Yes, it would be a far better world if every leader on the planet was held to the same rules of accountability, ethics, and laws. As long as some folks think they are better than others...... the fix will be in.

As the world gets smaller and its population more informed and aware......populations will not stand for destructive behavior. It might take a few generations and the demise of all the dinasaurs before it happens.

Currently there is a dangerous but potentially change making restlessness on the planet.

Only in your (small) mind



Who needs evidence when you know you are right because you read it in some lefty blog?
Hard to believe that people that managed to get enough education to operate a computer can still be that stupid and gullible. Not even bright enough to be considered trolls. Funny though.

......try sticking to the topic. Thanks.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
astonishing that the big minds (self proclaimed ) are in favor of war criminals. and crimes. OR are selective about who should be tried for same. Seems that the laws apply to everyone. No matter what your bias is.

Yes, it would be a far better world if every leader on the planet was held to the same rules of accountability, ethics, and laws. As long as some folks think they are better than others...... the fix will be in.

As the world gets smaller and its population more informed and aware......populations will not stand for destructive behavior. It might take a few generations and the demise of all the dinasaurs before it happens.

Currently there is a dangerous but potentially change making restlessness on the planet.



......try sticking to the topic. Thanks.

That is the topic
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Find the cost of Freedom

Buried in the Ground......

(with apologies to CSN).



Saddam murdered approximately 300,000 of his own people.

Saddam was an Arab Hitler, with aspirations of leading a larger Arab state....

Iraq is now a democracy.

Give it a break.

I'll see JLM's initial 2,000 Mugabe casualty ante and Colpy's raise of 300,000 Hussein casualties. I raise another 301,027 Bush violent deaths:

Lancet survey 601,027 violent deaths out of 654,965 excess deaths March 2003 to June 2006
I can go as high as 1,033,000.

Opinion Research Business survey
1,033,000 deaths as a result of the conflict March 2003 to August 2007

Actually Colpy If we were betting Hussein's dead iraqis against Bush's, I'd have to concede. A case can be made for Bush killing a million Iraqis, but Hussein still trumps Bush if you take into account the 1,000,000 or so deaths as a result of Hussein's decision to invade and occupy Iran: (total - both sides). Hussein's unprovoked war crime. BTW, did you also support Hussein's war of aggression too?

I suspect the reason you low balled Hussein was that you only counted the dead Iraqis from the failed 1991 Iraqi revolt. But I don't think Hussein can take full credit for that slaughter. At the time, the US told the locals that they'd support their revolt but when crunch time came the US did nothing. The US sat on the sidelines as Hussein crushed Basra's popular revolt with helicopters and tanks. (That incident alone was about 150,000 dead in about 4 weeks )
1991 uprisings in Iraq - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Some blood would have been on George Bush Sr's hands too.

I'll have to concede that Hussein is probably responsible for more Iraqi deaths than Bush... But to Bush's credit, he slaughtered all his Iraqis in just 8 years. Hussein killed Iraqis for over 20 years. Maybe if Bush had as much time to kill Iraqis as Hussein, he might have beat his record.

I've observed that blood thirsty killer's like Hussein tend to slack off as they get older. there are exceptions, but Hussein's murderous rampages were mostly back in the 80's when he was tight with the US. That was back in the day when the US tried to blame Hussein's gas attacks against civilians on the Iranians even thought the US military knew otherwise:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_support_for_Iraq_during_the_Iran%E2%80%93Iraq_war#Support

The US and Iraq were so tight during these years that when the rest of the world wanted to isolate Iraq because of Hussein's CW attacks against civilians, Ronnie Raygun picked up the slack with increased arms sales. American arms corporations made a killing... literally.

By 2003 Hussein was way past his paranoid psychotic prime. During his last 5 years of rule (1998-2003), Hussein may have killed 5000 Iraqis max. Most of those were during a 1998 prison purge. During the last year or so, few people saw Hussein and he pretty much didn't kill anyone. That's why our BS propaganda machines had to invent ongoing Hussein atrocities:
Saddam Hussein's alleged shredder - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The fact is, far more Iraqis died during this late period of Hussein's rule from easily treated diseases and malnutrition as a result of the economic embargo imposed Iraq until Iraq gave up their WMD stockpiles. Oh yeah, the last WMD destroyed in Iraq was a anthrax lab at a university in 1995. I guess those 8 years of US imposed disease and malnutrition (1995-2003) was all for nothing. I know the UNSC tried to lift the Iraq embrago several times, but the US refused to budge and maintained their veto. The US claimed they'd lift the embargo.... after Iraq proved the non-existence of WMD stockpiles. ( Good luck proving the non-existence of anything...)

This interview conveys the US attitude towards Iraqis at the time:

--60 Minutes (5/12/96)
Lesley Stahl on U.S. sanctions against Iraq: We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?
Secretary of State Madeleine Albright: I think this is a very hard choice, but the price--we think the price is worth it.

At least Albright put a value on Iraqi lives. I don't think Bush Jr ever did.

IMO, it must suck to be an Iraqi since 1979-present. I'm sure there's more to suffering to come. We won't stop screwing with these people until the oil companies have sucked their country dry.

How kilometers per Iraqi does your car get?
 
Last edited:

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
CHIEF PROSECUTOR OF THE KUALA LUMPUR WAR CRIMES COMMISSION v. GEORGE W BUSH & ANTHONY L. BLAIR

Transcript of Judgement


by Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal

CHIEF PROSECUTOR OF THE KUALA LUMPUR WAR CRIMES COMMISSION v. GEORGE W BUSH & ANTHONY L. BLAIR

Bush, Blair found guilty of war crimes in Malaysia Tribunal:

Complete Text of Judgment

Bush, Blair found guilty of war crimes in Malaysia Tribunal: Complete Text of Judgment



Bush and Blair Condemned for "Crimes against the Peace"
Historical Judgment of KL War Crimes Tribunal


http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=27818\


 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
and from another source:

Bush, Blair Found Guilty of War Crimes

By Press TV


November 25, 2011 --- A War Crimes Tribunal in Malaysia has found former US President George W. Bush and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair guilty of war crimes for their roles in the Iraq war.


Bush, Blair found guilty of war crimes   :  Information Clearing House


there may never be a true justice for the horrors they created , not out of critical necessity, but of elective choice........but they both and their supporting cast are toxic. Might just have to settle for that. Their names and the Iraq disaster are eternally tied now.