US drones killed 123 civilians, three al-Qaeda men in January

JBeee

Time Out
Jun 1, 2007
1,826
52
48
Monday, February 01, 2010
By By Amir Mir
LAHORE: Afghanistan-based US predators carried out a record number of 12 deadly missile strikes in the tribal areas of Pakistan in January 2010, of which 10 went wrong and failed to hit their targets, killing 123 innocent Pakistanis. The remaining two successful drone strikes killed three al-Qaeda leaders, wanted by the Americans.

The rapid increase in the US drone attacks in the Pakistani tribal areas bordering Afghanistan can be gauged from the fact that only two such strikes were carried out in January 2009, which killed 36 people. The highest number of drone attacks carried out in a single month in 2009 was six, which were conducted in December last year. But the dawn of the New Year has already seen a dozen such attacks.

The unprecedented rise in the predator strikes with the beginning of the year 2010 is being attributed to December 30, 2009 suicide bombing in the Khost area of Afghanistan bordering North Waziristan, which killed seven CIA agents. US officials later identified the bomber as Humam Khalil Abu Mulal al-Balawi, a Jordanian national linked to both al-Qaeda and the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP).

In a subsequent posthumous video tape released by Al-Jazeera, Balawi claimed while sitting next to TTP Chief Commander Hakimullah Mehsud that he would blow himself up in the CIA base to avenge the killing of former TTP chief Baitullah Mehsud in a US drone attack. The consequent increase in US strikes, first in North Waziristan and then South Waziristan, specifically targeting the fugitive TTP chief Hakimullah Mehsud clearly shows that revenge is the major motive for these attacks. The US intelligence sleuths stationed in Afghanistan are convinced the Khost suicide attack was planned in Waziristan with the help of the TTP. Therefore, it is believed Afghanistan-based American drones will continue to hunt the most wanted al-Qaeda and Taliban leaders, especially Hakimullah, with a view to avenge the loss of the seven CIA agents and to raise morale of its forces in Afghanistan.

According to the data compiled by the interior ministry, the first US drone strike was conducted on January 1 which struck a vehicle near Ghundikala village in North Waziristan and killed four people. The second attack came on January 3, targeting the Mosakki village in North Waziristan, killing five people. Two separate missile strikes carried out on January 6 killed 35 people in Sanzalai village of North Waziristan. The fifth predator attack was carried out on January 8 in the Tappi village of North Waziristan, killing five people. The sixth attack on January 9 in Ismail Khan village of North Waziristan killed four people, including two al-Qaeda leaders. Mahmoud Mehdi Zeidan, the bodyguard for al-Qaeda leader Sayeed al-Masri, and Jamal Saeed Abdul Rahim, who had been involved in hijacking of Pan Am Flight 73 in 1986, were reportedly killed in this missile strike.

The seventh US attack on January 14 in the Pasalkot village of North Waziristan killed 15 people, amidst rumours Hakimullah Mehsud could be among the dead.

The eighth drone attack came on January 15 in the Zannini village near Mir Ali in North Waziristan, killing 14 people, including an al-Qaeda-linked terrorist, Abdul Basit Usman, a Filipino wanted by the Americans. The ninth strike was carried out on January 17 in the Shaktoi area of South Waziristan, which killed 23 people. The tenth drone attack came on January 19 when two missiles were fired at a compound and vehicle in Booya village of Datakhel subdivision, 35km west of Miramshah, in North Waziristan, killing eight people. The eleventh strike carried out on January 29 targeting a compound belonging to the Haqqani network in the Muhammad Khel town of North Waziristan, killed six people. The twelfth and the last predator attack of the month came on January 30, killing nine people in the Lend Mohammad Khel area of North Waziristan.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
I wonder how many people al qaeda and taliban have killed.
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Yes we shouldn't let killing hundreds of innocent people handicap us from killing 3 people of interest. Its not like their relatives are going to be angry and join al Qaeda and the Taliban. I'm sure the Arab and Pakistani news has been filled with gory pictures of dead women and children.
 
Last edited:

Risus

Genius
May 24, 2006
5,373
25
38
Toronto
You kill the enemy where you find them.

Anything else is simply handicapping yourself unnecessarily.....and quite probably disasterously.

I think you would shoot your wife if she got in the way of your target...
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
EAO....I was not defending American overkill......I don't know how important the targets were, how "innocent" the civilians were, and I agree that the loss of civilian life is very seriously detrimental to the cause.....so I choose not to comment on that.

Risus, I been hanging out with my wife for almost 39 years.....since I was 16....in that time I have not so much as fired a shot in her general direction. Honest. lol
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
I wonder how many people al qaeda and taliban have killed.


What does it matter? Or, does the game work like this. As long as the coalition kills fewer innocents than the |Taliban or AQ everything is hunky dory?
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
The reports that come back a few years down the road might have numbers 4 x that size and nobody will bat an eyelash.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
The OP suggests that all these people were killed by Predator drones. The Predator is simply an unmanned aircraft that is flown by a pilot who is on the ground somewhere. It is this pilot who is killing people. What do you expect from the CIA....
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
We're having our own Jihad. If they don't like it they can Fatwa themselves.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Oh well. If they want to run to Pakistan the Predators will follow them. A few years ago when the Taliban and Al Queda were launching attacks from Pakistan these same folks were harping on why won't the US attack Pakistan insinuating the relationship between the US and Mussharef prohibits that. Well now we are attacking them in Pakistan and they are whinning about that.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Seems Americans care as much about innocent lives as do the Taliban and Al Quaeda.

Wrong.

there is a distinct difference......

The Americans are willing to kill civilians to get at their targets.........although in some cases it is impossible to differentiate between civilians and a legitimate target........I'd like to really know how many of the "innocents" killed were not active supporters of the Taliban and al-queda...

but I digress....

The Americans are willing to kill civilians if it is unavoidable in the pursuit of their goals.

Al-queda exists ONLY to kill civilians.
 

Avro

Time Out
Feb 12, 2007
7,815
65
48
55
Oshawa
Wrong.

there is a distinct difference......

The Americans are willing to kill civilians to get at their targets.........although in some cases it is impossible to differentiate between civilians and a legitimate target........I'd like to really know how many of the "innocents" killed were not active supporters of the Taliban and al-queda...

but I digress....

The Americans are willing to kill civilians if it is unavoidable in the pursuit of their goals.

Al-queda exists ONLY to kill civilians.

Okay, I can accept that.

Americans cry everytime they have to do it.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Okay, I can accept that.

Americans cry everytime they have to do it.

Yeah....sometimes it is not much of a difference on the ground.

I think that the USA badly underestimates the damage done by each civilian killed.....turn the Afghan people against the mission en masse.....and you HAVE lost the war.

Crying is somewhat better than cheering mass civilian casualties, though.

And yes, I know you were being sarcastic, I just chose to ignore the fact......because to an extent, I agree.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Wrong.

there is a distinct difference......

The Americans are willing to kill civilians to get at their targets.........although in some cases it is impossible to differentiate between civilians and a legitimate target........I'd like to really know how many of the "innocents" killed were not active supporters of the Taliban and al-queda...

Standard answer given to try and justify the targeting and killing of innocents.

but I digress....

and this is different how?

The Americans are willing to kill civilians if it is unavoidable in the pursuit of their goals.

Al-queda exists ONLY to kill civilians.

Oh ya....BIG difference:roll:......... unless, of course, if you're the one getting killed or the f
amily and friends of the one killed. I doubt they diferentiate and say: " It's OK, they were killed by the coalition".
 

Avro

Time Out
Feb 12, 2007
7,815
65
48
55
Oshawa
Yeah....sometimes it is not much of a difference on the ground.

I think that the USA badly underestimates the damage done by each civilian killed.....turn the Afghan people against the mission en masse.....and you HAVE lost the war.

Crying is somewhat better than cheering mass civilian casualties, though.

And yes, I know you were being sarcastic, I just chose to ignore the fact......because to an extent, I agree.

I was gonna say it's not a good way to get people on your side and win the hearts and minds but I didn't, thinking you would poo poo that.....I guess I was wrong.

Yet you still defend bombing a few hundred cilvilians to kill one or two terrorists.