U.S. to re-route Keystone XL due to environmental concerns

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Keystone inspector identifies shoddy work on original pipeline

A former inspector for a company that did work on TransCanada Corp. (TRP-T43.40-0.55-1.25%)'s original Keystone pipeline is accusing the Calgary-based company of a cavalier disregard for the environment.

Mike Klink was an engineer for construction company Bechtel Corp., a contractor that worked on the first portion of the Keystone pipeline that carries Alberta oil sands crude to refineries in the U.S. Midwest. It was completed in 2010; the controversial Keystone XL would extend that pipeline to Gulf Coast refineries.

In an opinion piece published over the weekend in Nebraska's Lincoln Journal Star, the 59-year-old Mr. Klink says he raised a series of concerns about alleged substandard materials and poor craftsmanship along the Keystone pipeline.

“Let's be clear — I am an engineer; I am not telling you we shouldn't build pipelines,” he wrote in the Nebraska newspaper.

“We just should not build this one.”

His job as an inspector, Mr. Klink said, involved monitoring the construction of pump stations along the first Keystone pipeline.

Mr. Klink says that he noticed substandard building materials, construction methods and safety standards as he inspected the pipeline.

“Cheap foreign steel that cracked when workers tried to weld it, foundations for pump stations that you would never consider using in your own home, fudged safety tests, Bechtel staffers explaining away leaks during pressure tests as ‘not too bad,' shortcuts on the steel and rebar that are essential for safe pipeline operation and siting of facilities on completely inappropriate spots like wetlands,” he wrote.


He said that he shared his concerns with his bosses, who passed them along to “the bigwigs at TransCanada, but nothing changed. TransCanada didn't appear to care.”

Keystone remains in the spotlight in the U.S. capital after Republicans succeeded in having a provision inserted into legislation to extend payroll tax cuts and unemployment insurance benefits to Americans hard-hit by tough economic times.

The measure would force the Obama administration to make a decision on Keystone XL within 60 days. White House officials and Democrats say the provision has all but killed the pipeline since a thorough review of a new route for Keystone XL — around a crucial aquifer in Nebraska — cannot be conducted in such a short time period.

Keystone inspector identifies shoddy work on original pipeline - The Globe and Mail
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,184
14,242
113
Low Earth Orbit
Keystone is 44 years old. Mr Klink was 15 when that pipe was layed.

Mr Klink didn't mention that code has come a long way since '67.

What was Bechtel doing hiring 15 year olds for engineers?

Unless Mr Klink is lieing?
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Keystone is 44 years old. Mr Klink was 15 when that pipe was layed.

Mr Klink didn't mention that code has come a long way since '67.

What was Bechtel doing hiring 15 year olds for engineers?

Unless Mr Klink is lieing?

Looks like you figured this one out Columbo!
 

Kakato

Time Out
Jun 10, 2009
4,929
21
38
Alberta/N.W.T./Sask/B.C
This guys not too bright.
As an inspector, my job was to monitor the construction of the first Keystone pipeline. I oversaw construction at the pump stations that have been such a problem on that line, which has already spilled more than a dozen times. I am coming forward because my kids encouraged me to tell the truth about what was done and covered up

If he was an inspector then he had to sign off on it and is ultimately responsible.He better pray nothing go's wrong because it will be him that gets his ass hauled into court.Your job as inspector is to make sure everything is done to code and if hes an engineer(not all inspectors are) then he was probably the chief inspector for what ever spread he was assigned to.

I bet money that TCPL allready has their lawyers on this.
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
In '75 I worked on a 23 mile stretch of pipeline in Petrolia Ontario, near Sarnia, that had been laid in '74 but had been pulled back out the next year because of bad joints.
Speaking to a tie-in welder,(I was his helper at the time), he conveyed to me that the previous year, all the welders at the time, and he was one of them, complained that the rod being used didn't match the pipe material.
Even though the x rays, (every single weld on a pipeline is X Rayed by inspectors), didn't show any defects, the inspection firm found out over the winter after more tests that what the welders were saying was true....that the mismatch in materials wouldn't hold for the proposed lifetime of the line....and 23 miles had to be redone.
And guess what....the inspection company...at least, when we redid the job was "Bechtel"...:smile:
 

Kakato

Time Out
Jun 10, 2009
4,929
21
38
Alberta/N.W.T./Sask/B.C
In '75 I worked on a 23 mile stretch of pipeline in Petrolia Ontario, near Sarnia, that had been laid in '74 but had been pulled back out the next year because of bad joints.
Speaking to a tie-in welder,(I was his helper at the time), he conveyed to me that the previous year, all the welders at the time, and he was one of them, complained that the rod being used didn't match the pipe material.
Even though the x rays, (every single weld on a pipeline is X Rayed by inspectors), didn't show any defects, the inspection firm found out over the winter after more tests that what the welders were saying was true....that the mismatch in materials wouldn't hold for the proposed lifetime of the line....and 23 miles had to be redone.
And guess what....the inspection company...at least, when we redid the job was "Bechtel"...:smile:

Interesting,I imagine a whole bunch of people would be scared if they saw how pipe was laid down in the early days.
TCPL usually uses their own inspectors but I imagine they contract out when they want the liabilty totally out of their hands.

So you were a beadhand then?
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
Interesting,I imagine a whole bunch of people would be scared if they saw how pipe was laid down in the early days.
TCPL usually uses their own inspectors but I imagine they contract out when they want the liabilty totally out of their hands.

So you were a beadhand then?

Not for long...I started as a labourer, the tie in helper got hurt, so they got me to replace him for a week, while he was recuperating, then just as he was coming back, the ambulance man got sick, and since I had all the necessary papers, I applied for the job, to get out of the mud and got to be the "Band-aid" for the rest of that job and for 5 months afterwards on another job in Rigaud Que.
The company I was working for was Majestic Wiley then a division of Pyrene Pacific, But Becthel was doing the inspecting at the time, although I understand that they are also a pipe laying company.

Edit: for those wondering "Band-aid" was the "nick" given to the first-aider at the time:smile:
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Pay close attention to this one folks..


John L. Ward : Keystone XL pipeline a bad deal

Edward Harmon’s statements about TransCanada’s proposed Keystone XL pipeline, designed to carry Canadian tar sands across the U.S. (Speaking Out, Jan. 2) are based on the unsupported claims of vested interests.

Harmon states that the pipeline would create between 10,000 and 60,000 construction jobs. But according to data TransCanada supplied to the State Department, the project will produce no more than 2,500 to 4,650 temporary construction jobs for two years and as few as 50 new, permanent pipeline jobs. By contrast, the solar industry added 6,700 permanent, well-paying jobs this past year.

Harmon states that the pipeline would reduce our dependence on oil from hostile countries. But an analysis by Department of Energy contractor Ensys Energy in December 2010 found that the pipeline would have virtually no impact on Middle East imports.

Based on a report commissioned by the State Department, Harmon brushes off the environmental threat that the pipeline poses. But he neglects to mention that this so-called “expert report” was written by a company recommended by TransCanada, Cardno Entrix, a “major client” of theirs.

Objective reports by the Cornell University Global Labor Institute and Dr. John Stansbury of the University of Nebraska are less reassuring.

The pipeline’s first two phases have caused over 30 spills in its first year of operation, despite supposedly meeting “world-class safety and environmental standards.” And the company supplying pipe for the completed and proposed pipelines (Welspun) is currently being sued for fraudulent sales practices and the sale of defective steel pipe, which caused pipe expansions unexpected before 46 years of use and which required replacing hundreds of pipe joints.

Harmon omits serious questions concerning TransCanada lobbyists, who were former staffers, supporters, and associates of Hillary Clinton (who was to make the decision about the pipeline unless the president intervened). And he neglects to consider the influence of the Koch brothers, whose subsidiary, Flint Hills Resources Canada LP, wrote the Canadian Energy Board that it “is among Canada’s largest crude oil purchasers, shippers and exporters... (and) has a direct and substantial interest in the application” for the pipeline.

The Koch brothers also have a dozen fuel refineries in the Midwest and Texas that would benefit from its construction. They have increased their wealth 43 percent in 2010, to $25 billion, largely attributable to buying and selling speculative products, particularly their participation in the unregulated derivatives markets that contributed to the skyrocketing price of oil.

Harmon expresses no concern over the ecological devastation or the greenhouse pollution caused by mining tar sands; two to four times the amount conventional oil produces. And of course he ignores the climate change incurred by accumulating greenhouse gasses, which threatens to create widespread drought, floods, storms, mudslides and other increasingly extreme weather that makes farming ever more difficult and increases ocean acidity, which diminishes the seas as a source of food.

Given this and other evidence that the pipeline is of questionable benefit to our country and poses significant environmental danger, Republican demands that President Barack Obama make a decision within two months would require him to reject the pipeline.

John L. Ward : Keystone XL pipeline a bad deal | Gainesville.com
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
What a hoot.

This article does more accusing the US Federal gvt of being bumbling idiots more than an argument against the pipeline..... Are we to believe that the US gvt was so blind to the notion that so few jobs would result or that the security/availability of offshore oil sources was so plentiful that the gvt provided the approvals on KXL out of stupidity?

Intuitively, you know better and while I am not a fan or supporter of governmental intelligence, the approvals for KXL were founded on very real and tangible reasons.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Me thinks that you'll be dining on a fine diet of Northern Gateway Crow in the near future topped-off with a healthy dollop KXL planted firmly on top.

That would only be crow if I predicted that those projects weren't going to happen.

It's much more satisfying watching you ingest the ethical oil and jobs jobs jobs crow. :)
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
.. He who laughs last...

The best part of all this is that it will be your messiah Obama that sticks it to you in the end. One might think of him as your Maitre' D.

You may wish to start studying the whine list right now, it offers a depth of opportunity and selection... You'll want only the finest excuses to help cram down that NG crow that will be served-up piping hot for ya.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
In the long rub Obama may very well be the best thing that ever happened to Canadian industry since he proved that the US cannot be depended upon and it is critical that we develope the infrastructure necessary to service new markets.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
In the long rub Obama may very well be the best thing that ever happened to Canadian industry since he proved that the US cannot be depended upon and it is critical that we develope the infrastructure necessary to service new markets.


No doubt... Canada should have developed alternate markets years ago.

Fortunately for us, Obama is in campaign-mode right now and he'll waste a couple of years trying to appease as many lobbies as he can before he boots them all in the nuts with a decision to push KXL forward. Hopefully, by that time, NG will have it's approvals already in place.

U.S. imports of AEO crude from the middle east actually go up from 2.42 million bpd (barrels per day) to 2.46 million bpd by 2030 if KXL is built.

Now how does that fit in exactly with with the ethical oil propaganda?


So says Ensys Energy.

When did they become the oracle on global energy?
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Facts? What are those?

The volume of WCSB crude imported by the U.S. would be unaffected by the availability of the KXL pipeline. In Figures 5-49 and 5-50, the line plots of Canadian imports of crude oil to the U.S. are almost identical for the KXL and No KXL cases. The results also show the similar 2030 results for these scenarios.

http://www.keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov/clientsite/keystonexl.nsf/AssmtDrftAccpt.pdf

So says Ensys Energy.

When did they become the oracle on global energy?

They were appointed by the U.S. to perform the assessment in order to validate the project.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Facts? What are those?

The volume of WCSB crude imported by the U.S. would be unaffected by the availability of the KXL pipeline. In Figures 5-49 and 5-50, the line plots of Canadian imports of crude oil to the U.S. are almost identical for the KXL and No KXL cases. The results also show the similar 2030 results for these scenarios. http://www.keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov/clientsite/keystonexl.nsf/AssmtDrftAccpt.pdf


.. So, were the US Feds just killin' time in studying this proposal 'cause they were tired of dealing with the econ conditions in their nation?

Really man, there is more to this issue than the simple and superficial analysis that you are relying upon.

They were appointed by the U.S. to perform the assessment in order to validate the project.


.. So, they can see into the future then?

Wow, I may just call 'em up to get the next winning lotto #'s.