Two years into the Trudeau 2.0 Minority Term, which day will Justin call the election that only he wants?

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
26,161
9,561
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Former Liberal deputy prime minister John Manley says it would be in Canada’s best interest to hold an election as soon as possible.

(I’m not gonna hold my breath)
“It would be in the country’s interest if we were to have our federal election and put a government in place, whether the current one or a different one, in time to deal with what’s coming out of Washington after Jan. 20,” Manley said.


Trump has vowed to impose more tariffs on trade partners, though some argue Canadian oil may be left out of such a move, while NATO defence spending has been a prominent frustration for American officials pressuring Canada to spend more.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,271
12,784
113
Low Earth Orbit
Former Liberal deputy prime minister John Manley says it would be in Canada’s best interest to hold an election as soon as possible.

(I’m not gonna hold my breath)
“It would be in the country’s interest if we were to have our federal election and put a government in place, whether the current one or a different one, in time to deal with what’s coming out of Washington after Jan. 20,” Manley said.


Trump has vowed to impose more tariffs on trade partners, though some argue Canadian oil may be left out of such a move, while NATO defence spending has been a prominent frustration for American officials pressuring Canada to spend more.
When we didnt want a Chinese influenced election in the midst of a global pandemic with vaccine passport bullshit we had one. When we want one when our biggest threat is Trudeau, he wont have one while trying to cover up the election fraud.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
26,161
9,561
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
At least this, for the Liberals, is distracting from the SDTC Green Slush Fund Scandal & the fact that parliament has been tied up and unable to do anything for the last three weeks…& then the drama of emerging from the Liberal caucus meeting like…whatever that was… Lying about how strong and united the liberal party happens to be???
1732755608140.jpeg
So…. What else will get slid through in this one day pause in Parliament?
1732755814326.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

bob the dog

Council Member
Aug 14, 2020
1,477
1,092
113
Trudeau hits Mar a Lago. Would be a nice place to stay and right up there with JT's usual level of comfort. Billed to Canada of course but that's of no concern.

Looks to me like the main discussion point was hair styles but can't figure out which way the info was flowing.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron in Regina

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
58,000
8,292
113
Washington DC
Trudeau hits Mar a Lago. Would be a nice place to stay and right up there with JT's usual level of comfort. Billed to Canada of course but that's of no concern.

Looks to me like the main discussion point was hair styles but can't figure out which way the info was flowing.

I guarantee you he wasn't comped by the owner
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron in Regina

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
26,161
9,561
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
May 2021- "Nobody wants an election in the middle of a pandemic."- Justin Trudeau

Aug 2021- "We's having an election on Sept. 20 as a 4th wave of Covid rears its ugly head"- Justin Trudeau.
Well, the level of Liberal voters in the Liberal tub certainly is lower than it was, and (so far) getting lower every day.

The Liberals aren't circling the drain yet, but one can hope.
We’re now in the run-up to the three leaders’ debates of the election campaign, of which the first two will be in French this Thursday and next Wednesday, with the one in English the following night. In effect, two-thirds of the six hours of prime time will be in the official language of one-fourth of Canadians.
…& that was the last election, billed by JT as “the most important election since WW2” or something crazy like that. In the summer of 2021, Justin Trudeau argued that he needed a new mandate to lead Canadians through the COVID-19 pandemic. That it was, even during a pandemic, with lockdowns still in place, masks mandatory, absolutely necessary!! Yet his justification was clear: leading through an extraordinary challenge required fresh validation from the people.

Fast forward to today, and Canadians find themselves facing an economic crisis that dwarfs even the pandemic in its potential to shape our nation’s future. Donald Trump has threatened a devastating 25% tariff on Canadian exports, a move that would cripple industries and cost countless jobs.

It’s not hyperbole to say this could be the single greatest economic challenge our country has ever faced. And yet, this time, the prime minister isn’t calling for a new mandate?
1733964412425.jpeg
Why the change in calculus? If Trudeau believed Canadians needed to endorse his pandemic plan at the ballot box, how can he justify clinging to power without fresh public support now, as Canada stares down the barrel of an economic disaster?
1733964717144.jpeg
The stakes could not be higher. Trump’s tariffs will not only damage our economy but also our ability to respond. Leadership matters in moments like this. A government with no clear mandate and no fresh ideas is a recipe for indecision, delay, and political paralysis.
1733964900164.jpeg
Worse still, dragging out the inevitable risks plunging Canadians into an election in the middle of an economic storm, with a new government forced to pick up the pieces and scramble to chart a course in the midst of chaos.
1733964943070.jpeg
This is not about partisan politics; it’s about preparing Canada for what lies ahead. A divided, distracted government cannot effectively navigate a crisis of this magnitude.
1733965006867.jpeg
If Trudeau genuinely believes in his own argument for a new mandate from the people during times of crisis, he should put his government to the test. If he wants a mandate to take on Trump, he should ask for one from the people.😳

Canadians deserve clarity and confidence as we face this economic threat — not political inertia. Leadership is about stepping up, not clinging on.
If Trudeau wants Canadians to trust him with their future, he should give them the chance to decide if they still do.
1733965215009.jpegAnd if he won’t, it raises an uncomfortable question: is this about what’s best for Canada or what’s best for Justin Trudeau?
1733965355991.jpeg
The country deserves an answer — and a chance to choose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: petros

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,271
12,784
113
Low Earth Orbit
…& that was the last election, billed by JT as “the most important election since WW2” or something crazy like that. In the summer of 2021, Justin Trudeau argued that he needed a new mandate to lead Canadians through the COVID-19 pandemic. That it was, even during a pandemic, with lockdowns still in place, masks mandatory, absolutely necessary!! Yet his justification was clear: leading through an extraordinary challenge required fresh validation from the people.

Fast forward to today, and Canadians find themselves facing an economic crisis that dwarfs even the pandemic in its potential to shape our nation’s future. Donald Trump has threatened a devastating 25% tariff on Canadian exports, a move that would cripple industries and cost countless jobs.

It’s not hyperbole to say this could be the single greatest economic challenge our country has ever faced. And yet, this time, the prime minister isn’t calling for a new mandate?
View attachment 26121
Why the change in calculus? If Trudeau believed Canadians needed to endorse his pandemic plan at the ballot box, how can he justify clinging to power without fresh public support now, as Canada stares down the barrel of an economic disaster?
View attachment 26122
The stakes could not be higher. Trump’s tariffs will not only damage our economy but also our ability to respond. Leadership matters in moments like this. A government with no clear mandate and no fresh ideas is a recipe for indecision, delay, and political paralysis.
View attachment 26123
Worse still, dragging out the inevitable risks plunging Canadians into an election in the middle of an economic storm, with a new government forced to pick up the pieces and scramble to chart a course in the midst of chaos.
View attachment 26124
This is not about partisan politics; it’s about preparing Canada for what lies ahead. A divided, distracted government cannot effectively navigate a crisis of this magnitude.
View attachment 26125
If Trudeau genuinely believes in his own argument for a new mandate from the people during times of crisis, he should put his government to the test. If he wants a mandate to take on Trump, he should ask for one from the people.😳

Canadians deserve clarity and confidence as we face this economic threat — not political inertia. Leadership is about stepping up, not clinging on.
If Trudeau wants Canadians to trust him with their future, he should give them the chance to decide if they still do.
View attachment 26126And if he won’t, it raises an uncomfortable question: is this about what’s best for Canada or what’s best for Justin Trudeau?
View attachment 26127
The country deserves an answer — and a chance to choose.
Its depressing to be oppressed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
27,703
7,526
113
B.C.
…& that was the last election, billed by JT as “the most important election since WW2” or something crazy like that. In the summer of 2021, Justin Trudeau argued that he needed a new mandate to lead Canadians through the COVID-19 pandemic. That it was, even during a pandemic, with lockdowns still in place, masks mandatory, absolutely necessary!! Yet his justification was clear: leading through an extraordinary challenge required fresh validation from the people.

Fast forward to today, and Canadians find themselves facing an economic crisis that dwarfs even the pandemic in its potential to shape our nation’s future. Donald Trump has threatened a devastating 25% tariff on Canadian exports, a move that would cripple industries and cost countless jobs.

It’s not hyperbole to say this could be the single greatest economic challenge our country has ever faced. And yet, this time, the prime minister isn’t calling for a new mandate?
View attachment 26121
Why the change in calculus? If Trudeau believed Canadians needed to endorse his pandemic plan at the ballot box, how can he justify clinging to power without fresh public support now, as Canada stares down the barrel of an economic disaster?
View attachment 26122
The stakes could not be higher. Trump’s tariffs will not only damage our economy but also our ability to respond. Leadership matters in moments like this. A government with no clear mandate and no fresh ideas is a recipe for indecision, delay, and political paralysis.
View attachment 26123
Worse still, dragging out the inevitable risks plunging Canadians into an election in the middle of an economic storm, with a new government forced to pick up the pieces and scramble to chart a course in the midst of chaos.
View attachment 26124
This is not about partisan politics; it’s about preparing Canada for what lies ahead. A divided, distracted government cannot effectively navigate a crisis of this magnitude.
View attachment 26125
If Trudeau genuinely believes in his own argument for a new mandate from the people during times of crisis, he should put his government to the test. If he wants a mandate to take on Trump, he should ask for one from the people.😳

Canadians deserve clarity and confidence as we face this economic threat — not political inertia. Leadership is about stepping up, not clinging on.
If Trudeau wants Canadians to trust him with their future, he should give them the chance to decide if they still do.
View attachment 26126And if he won’t, it raises an uncomfortable question: is this about what’s best for Canada or what’s best for Justin Trudeau?
View attachment 26127
The country deserves an answer — and a chance to choose.
If he hangs on long enough he will be the first governor of Canada
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taxslave2

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,028
3,812
113
Edmonton
Former Liberal deputy prime minister John Manley says it would be in Canada’s best interest to hold an election as soon as possible.

(I’m not gonna hold my breath)
“It would be in the country’s interest if we were to have our federal election and put a government in place, whether the current one or a different one, in time to deal with what’s coming out of Washington after Jan. 20,” Manley said.


Trump has vowed to impose more tariffs on trade partners, though some argue Canadian oil may be left out of such a move, while NATO defence spending has been a prominent frustration for American officials pressuring Canada to spend
Just asking, by Globalist, what do you mean exactly?
He follows the WEF. What does the WEF stand for? World-wide rule.