Two years into the Trudeau 2.0 Minority Term, which day will Justin call the election that only he wants?

[Serryah]

But yes, let's keep pretending PP and the Cons are no longer bigoted/hate filled assholes.

As for Trudeau's reaction... he did not help matters, but I also don't think he should have let it just go either like the Speaker suggested.

Fucking shameful on ALL sides.

But don't think somehow the Cons are going to "Save" Canada.

With people like "Garnett Genuis" as an MP for the Cons... the proof is there they don't GIVE a damn about Canada, just power, plain and simple.

 

[Ron in Regina]

But yes, let's keep pretending PP and the Cons are no longer bigoted/hate filled assholes.

Because of all the times that they’ve all been caught wearing black face, etc…thus they must all be the same. ALL the same…just like all Libs MUST wear Trudeau’s blackface ‘cuz they MUST ALL be the same?
I’ve listened to this four times and I can’t figure out what was said, but I’m assuming it was some homophobic arsehole comment (no pun intended), & the dude should get spanked, whomever actually said it, and whatever they actually said.

A $500 spanking in 1982 might have been effective, but it’s not 1982 any longer.

As for Trudeau's reaction... he did not help matters, but I also don't think he should have let it just go either like the Speaker suggested.

As for Trudeau’s reaction, I still don’t know what was said so I don’t know what he was reacting to, but he was absolutely loving it.

Whoever said something off colour, fine then them 10x the maximum of any other ethics violation that’s happened in the last decade (so 10x $500 = $5,000.00) and this would stop fairly quickly.

Fucking shameful on ALL sides.

But don't think somehow the Cons are going to "Save" Canada.

It’s time for a change. Pretty much anything different at this point.

With people like "Garnett Genuis" as an MP for the Cons... the proof is there they don't GIVE a damn about Canada, just power, plain and simple.

Hate to say it, but I’ve never heard of this guy before, but that doesn’t mean anything. I’m gonna carry on watching the rest of that 12 minutes or whatever of this video.

Eight+ minutes in, & I still don’t know what was said or who said it (this Garnett Genius”?) & doesn’t sound like the house speaker Gregg whatever could hear it either.

Ok, this Genius & the bathtub thing. Did they engage each other in the bathtub. That’s shitty. Even after I’ve listened to the singled out replay between 11 and 12 minutes a few times, I still can’t understand it, but I believe it. Dude should get fined. A financial spanking to make him remember this.

Trudeau, with his ethics violation with the Aga Khan's private island in the Bahamas, I think he got a $500 fine right? So give this Genius a $5000 fine. Maybe Trudeau got no fine, but spank Genius with 10x the max.

Dominic LeBlanc with the fish/clam licence to his uncles’s brother‘s dogs sparring partner (I think he was in charge of fisheries at that point too?) got a $500 max ethics violation fine, so fine this Genius 10x that so $5000. Maybe LeBlanc got no fine, but spank Genius with 10x the max, to bring it to a real current dollar figure.

Trudeau with SNC Lavatory & the whole Wilson Raybould (& a few other women under the liberal bus), didn’t he get a maximum $500 ethics violation fine? Give Genius-boy a $5000 fine ‘cuz this was out of line and he shouldn’t have said that. Maybe Trudeau didn’t get a fine here either (?) but hit Genius up with 10x the max to make him think twice.

The whole WE goat rodeo thing? Didn’t Trudeau or Morneau get a $500 max ethics violation fine? Give Genius 10x that at $5000 for perspective. It’s something even the wealthy would notice missing. Maybe neither got a fine, but….hit Genius with 10x the max that Trudeau &/or Morneau could have gotten.

Mary Ng? Helping out a buddy? I think the maximum ethics violation there was $500? Spank Genius with 10x that. Maybe Ng got out of a fine here, but spank Genius with 10x the max and he’ll feel this.

Garnett Genuis was an arsehole. He should get his spanking and let the electorate turf his butt in 389 days or hopefully less. The folks for the riding of Sherwood Park/Fort Saskatchewan can decide his fate.

“Does he engage with them in the bathtub?” Throw the book at him with the max fine x10!!

Hell, he should get 10x the max ethics violation fine just for his poetry alone! Below is 20 minutes of the CBC dissecting that sentence from this Genius MP:

It comes down to it doesn’t matter what he said or what it meant or what he meant, it was inappropriate, so fine him consistent with the maximum fine that anybody else gets with an ethics violation (max $500), or make a statement and modernize that dollar figure by multiplying it by 10.

(Also, I get the impression that the CBC and their panel of guests aren’t going to vote conservative)

To try and get a potentially more balanced perspective, Vassy Kapelos seems to take a bite out of everybody she interviews equally, without bias, so I’m gonna hunt and see if she will dissect this with a panel on the CTV platform. Vassy seems to intelligently get her pound of flesh from whoever she interviews with intelligent questions. I’m curious.

Consistent without the bias. I say fine Genius & then let his constituents fire him if they think his remarks were inappropriate. The sooner there’s an election, the sooner his constituents can make that call.

 

[petros]

Because of all the times that they’ve all been caught wearing black face, etc…thus they must all be the same. ALL the same…just like all Libs MUST wear Trudeau’s blackface ‘cuz they MUST ALL be the same?
View attachment 25005I’ve listened to this four times and I can’t figure out what was said, but I’m assuming it was some homophobic arsehole comment (no pun intended), & the dude should get spanked, whomever actually said it, and whatever they actually said.

A $500 spanking in 1982 might have been effective, but it’s not 1982 any longer.

As for Trudeau’s reaction, I still don’t know what was said so I don’t know what he was reacting to, but he was absolutely loving it.

Whoever said something off colour, fine then them 10x the maximum of any other ethics violation that’s happened in the last decade (so 10x $500 = $5,000.00) and this would stop fairly quickly.

It’s time for a change. Pretty much anything different at this point.

Hate to say it, but I’ve never heard of this guy before, but that doesn’t mean anything. I’m gonna carry on watching the rest of that 12 minutes or whatever of this video.

Eight+ minutes in, & I still don’t know what was said or who said it (this Garnett Genius”?) & doesn’t sound like the house speaker Gregg whatever could hear it either.

Ok, this Genius & the bathtub thing. Did they engage each other in the bathtub. That’s shitty. Even after I’ve listened to the singled out replay between 11 and 12 minutes a few times, I still can’t understand it, but I believe it. Dude should get fined. A financial spanking to make him remember this.

Trudeau, with his ethics violation with the Aga Khan's private island in the Bahamas, I think he got a $500 fine right? So give this Genius a $5000 fine. Maybe Trudeau got no fine, but spank Genius with 10x the max.

Dominic LeBlanc with the fish/clam licence to his uncles’s brother‘s dogs sparring partner (I think he was in charge of fisheries at that point too?) got a $500 max ethics violation fine, so fine this Genius 10x that so $5000. Maybe LeBlanc got no fine, but spank Genius with 10x the max, to bring it to a real current dollar figure.

Trudeau with SNC Lavatory & the whole Wilson Raybould (& a few other women under the liberal bus), didn’t he get a maximum $500 ethics violation fine? Give Genius-boy a $5000 fine ‘cuz this was out of line and he shouldn’t have said that. Maybe Trudeau didn’t get a fine here either (?) but hit Genius up with 10x the max to make him think twice.

The whole WE goat rodeo thing? Didn’t Trudeau or Morneau get a $500 max ethics violation fine? Give Genius 10x that at $5000 for perspective. It’s something even the wealthy would notice missing. Maybe neither got a fine, but….hit Genius with 10x the max that Trudeau &/or Morneau could have gotten.

Mary Ng? Helping out a buddy? I think the maximum ethics violation there was $500? Spank Genius with 10x that. Maybe Ng got out of a fine here, but spank Genius with 10x the max and he’ll feel this.

Garnett Genuis was an arsehole. He should get his spanking and let the electorate turf his butt in 389 days or hopefully less. The folks for the riding of Sherwood Park/Fort Saskatchewan can decide his fate.

“Does he engage with them in the bathtub?” Throw the book at him with the max fine x10!!

Hell, he should get 10x the max ethics violation fine just for his poetry alone! Below is 20 minutes of the CBC dissecting that sentence from this Genius MP:

It comes down to it doesn’t matter what he said or what it meant or what he meant, it was inappropriate, so fine him consistent with the maximum fine that anybody else gets with an ethics violation (max $500), or make a statement and modernize that dollar figure by multiplying it by 10.

(Also, I get the impression that the CBC and their panel of guests aren’t going to vote conservative)

To try and get a potentially more balanced perspective, Vassy Kapelos seems to take a bite out of everybody she interviews equally, without bias, so I’m gonna hunt and see if she will dissect this with a panel on the CTV platform. Vassy seems to intelligently get her pound of flesh from whoever she interviews with intelligent questions. I’m curious.

Consistent without the bias. I say fine Genius & then let his constituents fire him if they think his remarks were inappropriate. The sooner there’s an election, the sooner his constituents can make that call.

That is by far the most offensive thing Ive ever heard. How dare he!

 

[Ron in Regina]

That is by far the most offensive thing Ive ever heard. How dare he!

That’s very unspecific. How dare Genius? Trudeau? Morneau? Trudeau again? LeBlanc? Etc…?

 

[petros]

That’s very unspecific. How dare Genius? Trudeau? Morneau? Trudeau again? LeBlanc? Etc…?

Any male Conservative.

Who else?

 

[Ron in Regina]

Yeah…the green-tech funding agency (Green Slush Fund) thing. It’s come up here on the forum periodically…& it was only a matter of time before it started oozing like a puss filled wound.

House Speaker Greg Fergus ruled that the government appears to have violated the vast powers of the Commons when it failed to surrender records on the so-called “green slush fund” so they could be turned over to the RCMP, even though the force doesn’t want them???

The Speaker’s ruling is the latest in the “unusual, novel and unprecedented” battle between MPs and the Liberal government over the extent of parliamentary privilege over thousands of unredacted records regarding Sustainable Development Technology Canada (SDTC), the government green fund that was plagued by scandal before being ordered shut down earlier this year. What is unusual is that MPs wanted the documents to share with a third party, namely the RCMP.

“The House has the undoubted right to order the production of any and all documents from any entity or individual it deems necessary to carry out its duties,” Fergus told the Commons Thursday evening.

“The House has clearly ordered the production of certain documents, and that order has clearly not been fully complied with. He said he “cannot come to any other conclusion but to find that a prima facie question of privilege has been established,” Fergus added.

Fergus’s ruling was celebrated by opposition parties, whereas government House leader Karina Gould said it set a “terrible precedent.”

Government seemingly violated House powers on 'green slush fund' docs, Speaker rules — National Post

Fergus' ruling was celebrated by opposition parties, but Government House leader Karina Gould said it set a 'terrible precedent'

apple.news

Now it is up to the House of Commons to decide next steps. At Fergus’s suggestion, MPs spent Friday debating a motion that would send the issue to further study by the Commons procedure committee.

But the issue could also land in court if the government decides to ask a judge to settle the question in order to stall until the next election of whether the motion exceeds the generally sweeping powers of parliamentary privilege.

The government brought forward a similar case to prevent the disclosure of documents related to the firing of two scientists at the National Microbiology Lab in 2021, but the case was abandoned when a federal election was called. Surprise surprise…

In this latest case, Fergus was ruling on an issue raised last week by Conservative MP Andrew Scheer, who alleged that the government and the Office of the Auditor General had disobeyed a June 10 motion from the House of Commons to fork over all documents on the embattled SDTC.

In a report published in the spring, Auditor General Karen Hogan concluded that one out of six projects funded by STDC that she audited were ineligible and that the organization had serious governance issues. On the day her audit was published, the government announced it was abolishing the fund and folding it into the National Research Council.

The House of Commons order demanded the public service, the auditor general and SDTC to provide all documents on the troubled fund to the House of Commons law clerk, Michel Bédard. It then called on Bédard to provide the documents to the RCMP.

The problem is that in the following months, over a dozen government departments and agencies either provided redacted documents or simply refused to comply with the order and withheld some or all their records.

That included Hogan, who wrote the House of Commons in July arguing that she would not comply because it could compromise her office’s work. In September, she wrote Bédard advising him that she had provided some documents from SDTC in her possession.

Before and since Fergus’s ruling, the Liberals have aggressively opposed Scheer’s question of privilege.

Gould has repeatedly said the June 10 motion exceeded the powers of the House of Commons and blurred the lines between Parliament and police.

Shortly after Fergus read his ruling, Gould said it was an “extremely dark day for this House and a very troubling day for democracy in this country???” Accountability would set a terrible precedent.

 

[petros]

More election interference surfaced today...

 

[Ron in Regina]

House Speaker Greg Fergus ruled that the government appears to have violated the vast powers of the Commons when it failed to surrender records on the so-called “green slush fund” so they could be turned over to the RCMP, even though the force doesn’t want them???

House Speaker Greg Fergus ruled last Thursday that the government “clearly did not fully comply” with an order from the House to provide documents related to a now-defunct foundation responsible for doling out hundreds of millions of federal dollars for green technology projects.

The House has been seized with a debate on the issue ever since and Scheer said it will stay that way until the government agrees to hand over the documents to police.

House of Commons grinds to halt over allegations of Liberal ‘corruption’ - National | Globalnews.ca

Conservative House leader Andrew Scheer said the governing Liberals would rather see the House bogged down in debate than produce documents related to misspent government dollars.

globalnews.ca

The Liberals claimed that ordering the production of documents to be handed over to the RCMP blurs the lines between Parliament and the judiciary, and blame Conservatives for the dysfunction in the House.

Except….except it’s not just the Conservatives ordering the production of these documents…but ALL the opposition parties & now the Speaker of the House is saying the Liberals have to now also.

Liberal House leader Karina Gould called the request for the documents an abuse of Parliament’s power that tramples on the Charter rights of Canadians.

Scheer said the Charter exists “to protect the people from the government. It is not there to protect the government from accountability by the people.”

Guide to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Canada.ca

This guide explains the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and its importance in our daily lives.

www.canada.ca

I wonder if Karina Gould thinks this (section 8) is the part of Charter that accountability will violate?

 

[Ron in Regina]

Two months after telling MPs that the RCMP had not found any evidence of criminal wrongdoing at the so-called “green slush fund,” RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme now says there are “ongoing investigations” into the embattled fund.

Duheme made the comment to reporters Thursday after National Post asked if the RCMP had concerns about receiving documents on Sustainable Development Technology Canada (SDTC) through an order from the House of Commons.

“The investigation is ongoing, so I’ll limit my comments to that… There are investigations ongoing,” Duheme said, noting that he and deputy commissioner Mike Flynn had previously confirmed that to a Parliamentary committee.

National Post was unable to find any committee transcript going back to the spring in which either Duheme or Flynn confirmed the police force had investigations related to the embattled clean-tech fund.

Duheme did not specify who or what the RCMP was investigating in relation to SDTC, which the government decided to shut down in June following a scathing audit by Auditor General Karen Hogan.

RCMP says there are ongoing investigations into 'green slush fund' as House is 'ground to a halt' — National Post

Duheme did not specify who or what the RCMP was investigating in relation to SDTC

apple.news

 

[bob the dog]

So summer recess is over and in the first week or so two non confidence motions have been brought forward and now the house has been suspended until documentation relating to an investigation are turned over.

These are Canada's highest paid people doing nothing.

 

[pgs]

So summer recess is over and in the first week or so two non confidence motions have been brought forward and now the house has been suspended until documentation relating to an investigation are turned over.

These are Canada's highest paid people doing nothing.

They are doing what they do best . Nothing .

 

[IdRatherBeSkiing]

They are doing what they do best . Nothing .

Sometimes that is better. Imagine the last 9 years if all they did was nothing.

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

Sometimes that is better. Imagine the last 9 years if all they did was nothing.

Point. When the party you hate is in power, wouldn't you want them to be lazy and ineffective?

 

[petros]

Point. When the party you hate is in power, wouldn't you want them to be lazy and ineffective?

Fuck no. Who is on the hook for laziness and ineffectiviity? Botswanas? Somebody has to take the guff.

 

[Taxslave2]

So summer recess is over and in the first week or so two non confidence motions have been brought forward and now the house has been suspended until documentation relating to an investigation are turned over.

These are Canada's highest paid people doing nothing.

Doing nothing is an improvement over the normal destroying the economy.

 

[Ron in Regina]

Well, back to the green slush fund scandal of the week (or was that last weeks scandal?), & how to slither out from this one…Freeland says they will not, definitely, positively, absolutely, consider prorogation.

In late September, House of Commons Speaker Greg Fergus ruled the Liberals did not fully comply with a House order seeking materials related to a Sustainable Development Technology Canada program the Conservatives are calling a "green slush fund."

This opened up the ability for the Official Opposition to demand the Liberals hand over unredacted copies to the RCMP and advance a priority motion to – as the House Speaker suggested given the extraordinary circumstances – have the issue studied at the Procedure and House Affairs Committee.

Deliberations on the proposal take precedence over most other House business and have essentially seized the Commons since. As a result, the government hasn't been able to debate, let alone pass, key government legislation.

"We're not just going to let sit $400 million of corruption be swept under the rug so Justin Trudeau can get on with his day," Poilievre told reporters in the House foyer.

The minority Liberal government is not considering proroguing Parliament, Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland said Tuesday, despite persisting uncertainty over who is willing to keep propping them up and procedural wrangling over a Conservative led-privilege debate.

Asked about the chatter and if the prime minister was mulling ending this session of Parliament and resetting with a throne speech, Freeland said "no."

They are doing what they do best . Nothing .

Sometimes that is better. Imagine the last 9 years if all they did was nothing.

Point. When the party you hate is in power, wouldn't you want them to be lazy and ineffective?

Fuck no. Who is on the hook for laziness and ineffectiviity? Botswanas? Somebody has to take the guff.

Doing nothing is an improvement over the normal destroying the economy.

Work in the House of Commons has stalled now for eight straight sitting days, as MPs are seized with a priority discussion about their work being impeded by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's government not turning over documents related to misspending by a now-defunct green technology fund.

As of late Tuesday, there were no signs of the debate collapsing to allow the matter to come to a vote.

"We're ready for this matter to move on," Government House Leader Karina Gould said. I’m sure they are but… have they turned over the unredacted documents yet?

To end the current impasse, the minority Liberals will need another party to help them force the House to move on to other business. On Tuesday, the NDP didn't seem keen to play that role.

With no indication they'll be assisted in ending the standstill, speculation continues to swirl around another lever the Liberals could pull to end the impasse: prorogation.

It's a parliamentary pause button & kill switch on all impending bills & motions.

Liberals considering proroguing Parliament amid document impasse? Freeland says 'no' — CTV News

The minority Liberal government is not considering proroguing Parliament, Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland said Tuesday, despite persisting uncertainty over who is willing to keep propping them up and procedural wrangling over a Conservative led-privilege debate.

apple.news

 

[petros]

Well, back to the green slush fund scandal of the week (or was that last weeks scandal?), & how to slither out from this one…Freeland says they will not, definitely, positively, absolutely, consider prorogation.

In late September, House of Commons Speaker Greg Fergus ruled the Liberals did not fully comply with a House order seeking materials related to a Sustainable Development Technology Canada program the Conservatives are calling a "green slush fund."

This opened up the ability for the Official Opposition to demand the Liberals hand over unredacted copies to the RCMP and advance a priority motion to – as the House Speaker suggested given the extraordinary circumstances – have the issue studied at the Procedure and House Affairs Committee.

Deliberations on the proposal take precedence over most other House business and have essentially seized the Commons since. As a result, the government hasn't been able to debate, let alone pass, key government legislation.

"We're not just going to let sit $400 million of corruption be swept under the rug so Justin Trudeau can get on with his day," Poilievre told reporters in the House foyer.

The minority Liberal government is not considering proroguing Parliament, Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland said Tuesday, despite persisting uncertainty over who is willing to keep propping them up and procedural wrangling over a Conservative led-privilege debate.

Asked about the chatter and if the prime minister was mulling ending this session of Parliament and resetting with a throne speech, Freeland said "no."





Work in the House of Commons has stalled now for eight straight sitting days, as MPs are seized with a priority discussion about their work being impeded by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's government not turning over documents related to misspending by a now-defunct green technology fund.

As of late Tuesday, there were no signs of the debate collapsing to allow the matter to come to a vote.

"We're ready for this matter to move on," Government House Leader Karina Gould said. I’m sure they are but… have they turned over the unredacted documents yet?

To end the current impasse, the minority Liberals will need another party to help them force the House to move on to other business. On Tuesday, the NDP didn't seem keen to play that role.

With no indication they'll be assisted in ending the standstill, speculation continues to swirl around another lever the Liberals could pull to end the impasse: prorogation.

It's a parliamentary pause button & kill switch on all impending bills & motions.

Liberals considering proroguing Parliament amid document impasse? Freeland says 'no' — CTV News

The minority Liberal government is not considering proroguing Parliament, Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland said Tuesday, despite persisting uncertainty over who is willing to keep propping them up and procedural wrangling over a Conservative led-privilege debate.

apple.news

Perogie or fillabuster or billabong or scoobiedooinkatmandu until a sate is set?

 

[Ron in Regina]

Perogie or fillabuster or billabong or scoobiedooinkatmandu until a sate is set?

When MPs head to their ridings for Thanksgiving break, they won’t have much to say about what they’ve accomplished so far this fall. Nearly half of the sitting days have been devoted to one thing: the Liberals’ refusal to hand over a trove of documents connected to a major spending scandal.

The Conservatives have nicknamed the SDTC scandal the “Green Slush Fund,” alleging a partisan bent to where the money went, a claim the Liberals have outright denied.

But no one is denying there was a problem. In 2022, whistle-blowers alleged government money flowing through SDTC was going to organizations with direct ties to management. That revelation prompted an internal government probe and SDTC’s work was suspended. The federal ethics commissioner found the chair broke the rules and the Auditor-General also launched an investigation, concluding there were “significant lapses” in governance and stewardship of public money meant for bolstering green technology.

It’s what might happen next that is at the heart of the debate in the House: The opposition parties, a majority of MPs, passed a motion calling for all the related documents so they can be handed over to the RCMP for a potential criminal probe. The Liberals don’t want to release them all.

Liberals’ refusal, opposition’s demands over documents for spending scandal has created a government backlog — The Globe and Mail

Wednesday was the eighth day of debate on the opposition’s demand for documents related to the now-defunct Sustainable Development Technology Canada agency

apple.news

Absent handing over the records, the Liberals could break the gridlock by moving a motion to shut down debate. Ms. Gould wouldn’t say Wednesday if she will.

The Liberals would need the support of either the Bloc Québécois or New Democrats for the motion to pass.

On Wednesday, the Bloc said they wouldn’t vote in favour of such a motion now. Party leader Yves-François Blanchet is holding fast to his pledge that unless a bill protecting supply management and another boosting federal benefits for seniors aged 65 to 74 become law by Oct. 29, he’s not supporting the Liberals.

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh didn’t signal much support for ending the stalemate either. “The ball is the government’s court,” he said.

When this privilege debate ends, it still won’t mean business as usual. There’s another waiting in the wings.

Mr. Fergus has also ruled that Tourism Minister Randy Boissonault’s former business partner’s refusal to provide all the information about the pair’s business relationship breached MP privilege, so next up will be the debate on that.

 

[bob the dog]

Then one day you are an old person looking back and saying we sure didn't do that well.

From what I am told watching Ancient Aliens is most civilizations last approximately 300 years.

Greed and selfishness rules the day.

 

[Ron in Regina]

OTTAWA — With no new campaign director, no new ad campaign rollout, no major cabinet shuffle, and no change at the top amid grim polling data for Justin Trudeau's Liberals, anxiety and dread amongst MPs and insiders about their electoral prospects has ramped up, sources tell the Star.

Most MPs head out Friday — some fled Ottawa earlier — into a Thanksgiving week parliamentary break which should be a reprieve from parliamentary wrangling with the opposition Conservatives that has stalled government business for two weeks.

Instead, with an election that could come any time thanks to the unstable Liberal minority in Parliament, several MPs and party insiders are expressing deep unease that party brass — and Trudeau himself — still haven't staked out a clear path for the beleaguered party.

"I continue to look for signals that there's a plan, and I don't see anything," said Wayne Long, the lone sitting Liberal MP who has publicly called for Trudeau to resign as leader for the good of the party.

Asked to describe the mood of his colleagues, Long said MPs are "really worried." Pierre Poilievre's Conservatives appear to be already in "full campaign mode," while the Liberals don't seem to have "any level of urgency," Long said. "There's a heightened awareness and a heightened concern that something has to happen here.

"The status quo is leading us to obliteration." Que the “Rocky” theme song?

Behind the scenes, anxious Liberals wonder if Justin Trudeau has a plan for re-election: 'The status quo is leading us to obliteration' — Toronto Star

With no new campaign director, no new ad campaign rollout, no major cabinet shuffle, and no change at the top amid grim polling data for Justin Trudeau's Liberals, anxiety and dread amongst MPs and insiders about their electoral prospects has ramped up, sources tell the Star.

apple.news