Trump's AMERICA : 2018 (& world reaction )

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
You could move there permanently, you know, and live there as an illegal.


Got any kids?
Walnut breathes in an out, there is no other quality of life sign showing. only what you find in a black heart, sad really. In other news a new treatment for hang-nails has come out, finally something important.
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
Judge orders Stormy Daniels to pay Trump $293K in legal fees

A federal judge on Tuesday ordered adult-film star Stormy Daniels to pay President Trump more than $293,000 in legal fees amid their ongoing legal battles.
U.S. District Judge James Otero ordered Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, to pay the fees in her defamation case against Trump, which Otero dismissed in October.
Daniels alleged that Trump defamed her in an April tweet that mocked her claims that a man threatened her in 2011 to keep quiet about her alleged affair with Trump.
Shortly after Daniels and her attorney, Michael Avenatti, released a forensic sketch of the man who allegedly threatened her, Trump posted a side-by-side photo suggesting that the man was Daniels's ex-husband.
After the defamation case failed, Trump's attorneys had requested that Daniels pay them $340,000 in legal fees.
Otero, writing that Trump's attorneys spent "excessive" time on the case, ordered Daniels to pay about 75 percent of Trump's legal fees, plus an additional $1,000 in sanctions.
Trump's attorney, Charles Harder, praised Tuesday's decision as "a total victory for the President, and a total defeat for Stormy Daniels in this case."

For those interested the rest of the article is a hit piece against Trump
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
You are such a good lil commie!

back to the real news

Unconstitutional: Federal Judge Strikes Down Obamacare

Texas and an alliance of 19 states argued to the judge that they’ve been harmed by an increase in the number of people on state-supported insurance rolls. They claimed that when Congress repealed the tax penalty last year, it eliminated the U.S. Supreme Court’s rationale for finding the ACA constitutional in 2012.

The Texas judge agreed.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattv...federal-judge-strikes-down-obamacare-n2537538

I hope you nuts can take a punch!
:)