Trump America : 200 days Plus......

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
:laughing3:

Did you make those yourself or did you get them from facebook? Time to change up. The meme thing is getting old. Try posting your own thoughts. Spar verbally. Not everyone can read "sign" language! Get it? Sign language! Ask your friend Mhz for help if you're having difficulties. He'll help you, I'm sure.
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,396
94
48
and counting to WHAT?? The execution of the 25 th Amendment?? ( because the chap is a lunatic ) Now THAT actually would make sense.

Lunatic is the "technical" term for his condition. Narcissistic sociopath.

Horses Patoot (ass) is the lay mans term.;-) No disrespect t o horses.:)
 
Last edited:

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
"And counting" an increasing number of days towards the end of his mandate. Possibly his first of two. Time will tell.

All though Merle released this 36 years ago, it is still current. It is a positive message to all the naysayers then, and now. Pessimism gives you worry lines and wrinkles.

[youtube]sxLtXJzo3Ew[/youtube]
 

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
Good for him. Time to put some American sourced materials into the system. This was talked about a few years ago, when Obama was in office. It was suggested that more corn and soybeans needed to be grown by US farmers to lessen dependence on imports.

It looks like they are going to move in that direction.
 

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
Here's one of the requests to Obama. I guess he either didn't get to it, or their request was ignored. Take note of the last para.

As you can see, cites have value.
---

ASA Sends Letter Urging President Obama to Improve the RFS

Posted June 5, 2014

In a letter sent this week, ASA (American Soybean Assn - Murphy) urged President Barack Obama to intervene and improve the proposed Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) 2014 volume requirements for biomass- based diesel.

The letter states, “The EPA proposal to limit the biomass-based diesel volumes to 1.28 billion gallons for2014 and 2015 would unnecessarily stunt the growth of the U.S. biodiesel industry and would forego the significant emissions reductions and economic benefits derived from this growing sector. It is both troubling and perplexing that the Administration, which has heretofore strongly supported biodiesel for its many environmental and economic benefits, would propose to establish RFS levels that are below 2013 domestic consumption and production levels.”

Reducing the 2014 and 2015 RVO for Biomass-based diesel below 2013 production levels would result in reduced demand for soybean oil, which accounts for about half of all U.S. biodiesel production. Biodiesel production in 2013 utilized approximately six billion pounds of soybean oil. With large crops and global soybean production expected to increase in 2013 and 2014, reduced levels of soy oil being consumed in the domestic food market, and an increase in other biodiesel feedstocks coming online, the need for a growing biodiesel market is vital to the bottom line for U.S. soybean farmers.

The letter emphasized how biodiesel has created thousands of jobs in nearly every state in the U.S., has support from numerous members of congress, governors and mayors across the country and how its expansion would have a positive impact on agriculture.

The letter is here.

source: https://soygrowers.com/asa-sends-letter-urging-president-obama-improve-rfs/
 
Last edited:

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
Ocean Breeze;2519707 In fact they would have to ban their own population. the US has home grown terrorism .[/QUOTE said:
What country with a population of 320 million hasn't? :)

The Trumpster loves himself and money. PEOPLE are either USEFUL or not useful to HIM and for him. Since his true colors are now on display for the world to see......seems his properties and income from them have been negatively affected. Many are not inclined to stay at or associate with anything "Trump"


His colours are pretty much in line with other political leader's colours, he's not much different.

JLM, I did not make the statement that Trump's sole purpose for taking office was to line his pockets and those of his filthy rich cronies. Cliffy did. I read it and asked for proof.

If you make an accusation, as Cliffy did, you are required to prove that accusation.
----

As a sidebar, the government has been examining his earnings and income statements.


I didn't make the accusation that I recall.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.


Doesn't mean much gopher- the sole reason these people are paying $billions in the first place is because they have it and that is dead wrong! Isn't it time some of the layabout got up off their ass and started contributing. I'm a great believer in "user pays" except of course where it's a physical impossibility. :)
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,396
94
48
His colours are pretty much in line with other political leader's colours, he's not much different.

He is NOT a politician.. IF he was he would at least have an understanding of what the job entails and the political nuances involved. He would understand the imperatives of diplomacy. and tactfulness.

He is a crude , business man......who was not that well liked in the world of business. or more specifically real estate . He was never in the league of the Rothschild and wanted to be badly. He was always an outsider.......a very unattractive outsider. He had and has no finesse.

Even the worst politician can't come close to him Most have some boundaries that they won't cross. He has none.

He would be tolerable if he was just a routine but ineffective politician.
 

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
That only applies to you, Wolfy. You can only meme and insult. Try contributing something of value. It would also help if you would read rather than react.
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
Again, neither article offers any proof that Trump only had one purpose in mind when running for president.

Yes, he's made money, but nowhere in your articles does it state "His sole purpose was to line his pockets and those of his friends." Or words to that effect.

The way Trump handled his campaign and the small amount of out-of-pocket spending in his run for president indicated from the start that he was probably in the campaign for the publicity and the money. I think he was genuinely surprised when his campaign actually made him the front-runner in the GOP primaries. When his campaign was over he had a surplus of campaign funds of over $90 million. I wonder where that money has gone. It certainly has not gone to charity as promised. Trump has always been about putting himself first. To argue otherwise is simply ignoring his history.
 

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
I like to see proof when someone makes an accusation. Suppositions or probablys don't cut it.

When you make a statement like that, you should be prepared to back it up. Cliffy, in his usual way, decided to insult and post something that could not be substantiated. That is why I asked for proof. So far, none has appeared.

If Trump only sought the presidency to make money for himself and his friends, I think something would have come to light. Lord knows, he's being examined quite closely by many organizations for many things.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
He is NOT a politician.. IF he was he would at least have an understanding of what the job entails and the political nuances involved. He would understand the imperatives of diplomacy. and tactfulness.

He is a crude , business man......who was not that well liked in the world of business. or more specifically real estate . He was never in the league of the Rothschild and wanted to be badly. He was always an outsider.......a very unattractive outsider. He had and has no finesse.

Even the worst politician can't come close to him Most have some boundaries that they won't cross. He has none.

He would be tolerable if he was just a routine but ineffective politician.


So you are deemed qualified to judge and evaluate people and assign them to a spot in the line up of the human race?

Trumpites:





Isn't everyone ignorant about something?
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
59,710
9,244
113
Washington DC
I disagree. When you make a statement, you should be prepared to back it up. Mud slinging is childish, as is name calling. Understand that I am not defending Trump. I am disappointed with the cheap shots and unsubstantiated posts.
To be fair to Twila, not all arguments need supporting facts and reasoning. Water is wet. Black and white are not the same. A dropped hammer will accelerate toward the center of the earth at 9.8 m/sec/sec unless influenced by another force. Trump is an imbecile.

We got a quote for that hereabouts. . . "We hold these truths to be self-evident. . ."

I like to see proof when someone makes an accusation. Suppositions or probablys don't cut it.

When you make a statement like that, you should be prepared to back it up. Cliffy, in his usual way, decided to insult and post something that could not be substantiated. That is why I asked for proof. So far, none has appeared.

If Trump only sought the presidency to make money for himself and his friends, I think something would have come to light. Lord knows, he's being examined quite closely by many organizations for many things.
I think it's fairly obvious by now that Trump sought the Presidency as the apotheosis of his desperate need for attention and control.

The only people to whom this is not patent are those whose unmet emotional needs are as deep as President Drunkuncle's.

It's really dangerous for a person who is so deeply unhappy and needy to have that much power. Fortunately for the world, President Drunkuncle appears to lack the focus and intelligence to use it effectively.
 

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
To be fair to Twila, not all arguments need supporting facts and reasoning. Water is wet. Black and white are not the same. A dropped hammer will accelerate toward the center of the earth at 9.8 m/sec/sec unless influenced by another force. Trump is an imbecile.

We got a quote for that hereabouts. . . "We hold these truths to be self-evident. . ."

I have asked for anything that supports what has been said throughout this thread. I am aware that it is not a court of law, but if you are going to accuse someone of something, back it up. Not doing so makes you look foolish. And worse.

Earlier, Cliffy said, "Trump's sole purpose for taking office was to line his pockets and those of his filthy rich cronies." I asked for something to back up his statement. Nothing was provided.

I think it's fairly obvious by now that Trump sought the Presidency as the apotheosis of his desperate need for attention and control.

The only people to whom this is not patent are those whose unmet emotional needs are as deep as President Drunkuncle's.

It's really dangerous for a person who is so deeply unhappy and needy to have that much power. Fortunately for the world, President Drunkuncle appears to lack the focus and intelligence to use it effectively.

It wasn't obvious to me why he ran. He said he wanted to make America great again. I suggest that most people here were in the same boat as I. They didn't know why he ran either.

WRT his mental state, a psychologist - probably a number of them - will have to make that judgment. Until then, it's just supposition, and certainly no one here is able or qualified to make that assessment.

Going back to Cliffy's statement for just a moment, he said, "Trump's sole purpose for taking office was to line his pockets and those of his filthy rich cronies." That's one thing. desire for money.

Now you mentioned Trump's need for attention and control. That's two things.

In total, that's three things. Attention. Control. Getting richer.

Providing something to back up your point is the responsible thing to do. Insults or saying "everybody knows he's..." is childish. It's just mudslinging. Slagging.

Finally, not everything posted in this thread is self evident, but much of it is slanderous. Most is unsubstantiated. It sounds like a group of school children trying to outdo each other tossing insults back and forth because it's the cool thing to do.

I understand why some people may feel this way, but at least show me how you came to these conclusions.