Trump America : 200 days Plus......

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
He has to get them off the world stage first, then the swamp can be drained. Did you see that stuff as being at the end of his term rather than the beginning?

PS it isn't the tweets making people nervous at the CIA, it was him signing things without them getting a chance to edit it.
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,396
94
48
He has to get them off the world stage first, then the swamp can be drained. Did you see that stuff as being at the end of his term rather than the beginning?

PS it isn't the tweets making people nervous at the CIA, it was him signing things without them getting a chance to edit it.
Seriously: Do you think there is a rational , coherent "master plan" underlying all this ( this being everything since Jan )


Just WHAT and WHOM is part of his "drain the swamp" intention?? as in which bottom feeders (as defined by him -Croc-in chief-.....are targets?? Using swamp vernacular.;-)
 
Last edited:

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Fraid so, the Rothschild thread is not a fantasy novel and they do make plans that take more than a century to be completed. It is probably also quite true that their desire for immortality has more to do with the one hatching the plan being the one to see it through as good help is hard to find, even among the elite.

The plan that is unfolding was put into motion in the 1880's and it saw both World Wars being nothing more that items to be checked off as the plan unfolded. They desire to be literally referred to as gods and so this plan is still unfinished.

The swamp rats would be any elected official that takes money from anybody outside of his own area. Start with them at a Federal and State level, what is left is the country's new Government that runs with 50% less people and at 25% of the operating cost.

Slough sharks are women (or men) who get ahead by using sex as a stepping stone. Important stuff like a better parking spot.
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,396
94
48
, what is left is the country's new Government that runs with 50% less people and at 25% of the operating cost.

...the objective being Cost effectiveness or consolidation of power?? Or both??

Are the people of the US aware of the plan or the details of the plan??

In your view....Does Trump qualify as an instrument of/ and for furthering this plan (given that he is well on his way to the god complex syndrome as we speak. Being a dictator might not be enough for him .

the croc in chief seems to be targeting those that don't follow the Trump line. He wants a group of yes people around him. Critical thinkers need not apply. He would like to clear the swamp of anyone that is not loyal to him. Just like god....LOYALTY is a one way street
with him.;-)


The god complex is not new as such. History has leaders and others that had the syndrome ......and the "results this created.
 
Last edited:

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Getting the best service for the money spent. The need for two governments ended when the telephone was installed coast to coast. Neither will vote themselves out of a cushy job with lots of perks not available to their employers.

Yes people in front of the cameras, if critical thinking is not allowed behind closed door then it is already a failed program.

The god complex cannot come if there are just a few generations from the same family serve as 'politicians'. It is longer than that when power issues surface. Make money an essential service and the business people will abandon it, fixing all of it's flaws in one shot.

Iceland aired their dirty laundry so it are good for 100 years before the takeover will begin again.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Team Obama’s stunning cover-up of Russian crimes

Modal Trigger Team Obama’s stunning cover-up of Russian crimes
AP
It turns out the Obama administration knew the Russians were engaged in bribery, kickbacks and extortion in order to gain control of US atomic resources — yet still OK’d that 2010 deal to give Moscow control of one-fifth of America’s uranium. This reeks.

Peter Schweizer got onto part of the scandal in his 2015 book, “Clinton Cash”: the gifts of $145 million to the Clinton Foundation, and the $500,000 fee to Bill for a single speech, by individuals involved in a deal that required Hillary Clinton’s approval.

SEE ALSO
Obama administration knew about Russian bribery plot before uranium deal
FBI uncovered Russian bribery plot before controversial nuclear deal
The New York Times confirmed and followed up on Schweizer’s reporting — all of it denounced by Hillary as a partisan hit job.
But now The Hill reports that the FBI in 2009 had collected substantial evidence — eyewitnesses backed by documents — of money-laundering, blackmail and bribery by Russian nuclear officials, all aimed at growing “Vladimir Putin’s atomic-energy business inside the United States” in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

The bureau even flagged the routing of millions from Russian nuclear officials to cutouts and on to Clinton, Inc.

Hillary Clinton, again, sat on a key government body that had to approve the deal — though she now claims she had no role in a deal with profound national security implications, and during the campaign called the payments a coincidence.

The Obama administration — anxious to “reset” US-Russian relations — kept it all under wraps, refusing to tell even top congressional intelligence figures.

And when the Obamaites in 2014 filed low-level criminal charges against a single individual over what the FBI found, they did so with little public fanfare.

“The Russians were compromising American contractors in the nuclear industry with kickbacks and extortion threats, all of which raised legitimate national security concerns,” one veteran of the case told The Hill.

Yet the administration let Moscow move ahead — publicly insisting that there were no national security worries — and no evidence of Russian interference, despite many lawmakers’ concern at the time.

There’s more: Until September 2013, the FBI director was Robert Mueller — who’s now the special counsel probing Russian meddling in the 2016 election. It’s hard to see how he can be trusted in that job unless he explains what he knew about this Obama-era cover-up.
Team Obama’s stunning cover-up of Russian crimes | New York Post


Well there you have the reason for all the prop spin ghanda we have been under the shovel of lately
;)


Cliffy claims that Trump's sole purpose for taking office was to line his pockets and those of his filthy rich cronies.


Maybe, Murphy should prove otherwise for balance.

"Because he loves his country ... "

Yeah. Right.

He loves himself.


Funny, his opponents are all nazis and communists who want to destroy the US to form a world technoDIKTATORSHIP and rule like nutless bitches.
You would have to be "all about enriching yourself" to up against those pansy f-tard baby rapers.
 

Twila

Nanah Potato
Mar 26, 2003
14,698
73
48
JLM, I did not make the statement that Trump's sole purpose for taking office was to line his pockets and those of his filthy rich cronies. Cliffy did. I read it and asked for proof.

If you make an accusation, as Cliffy did, you are required to prove that accusation.
----

this isn't some kind of debate forum so there are no rules to what you can state and what you can't.

Trumps a horses ass. I don't need to prove that with cites which are pointless anyway thanks to trump and fake news. But you type trump is a horses ass and wow! google has lots of cites about it...but fake news so...
 

Twila

Nanah Potato
Mar 26, 2003
14,698
73
48
well it could be worse. It could be in the negatives...


 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,396
94
48
well it could be worse. It could be in the negatives...


I think that graphic is wrong........ it IS in the negative zone .


The current furor over Trump's mishandling of the "condolence call" might get him into serious negative territory


Also : not to dignified to offer a surviving family a check for 25 G a in June and not mail it. ( until today ) Kinda gives new meaning to "the check is in the mail" Sheesh. Is Trump sending each serving family ( of troops that were killed ) a check for 25G?? Not sure one can put a monetary value on such a devastating loss. The youth that die in these horrific wars deserve more dignity.......
 

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
this isn't some kind of debate forum so there are no rules to what you can state and what you can't.

Trumps a horses ass. I don't need to prove that with cites which are pointless anyway thanks to trump and fake news. But you type trump is a horses ass and wow! google has lots of cites about it...but fake news so...

I disagree. When you make a statement, you should be prepared to back it up. Mud slinging is childish, as is name calling. Understand that I am not defending Trump. I am disappointed with the cheap shots and unsubstantiated posts.

You can disagree with Trump all you want, but he deserves the same courtesy that is extended to you and me, if we were accused something that could put us in jail. With everything that has been said about him, I have yet to see the FBI slap the cuffs on.

Remember that there is a marked difference between what you think of a person, and what is factual about that person. We have all met people in our lives who we did not like.

In the "Gun Control is Useless" thread, TB said this about giving one's opinion of something. I agree with what he said. The underlining is mine.

Ah, yes, the good old "My opinion is as good as yours" schtick.

Wrong.

Allow me to clarify: you have every bit as much right to your opinion as Colpy has to his. That does not mean they are of the same quality. An opinion that is backed up by facts and reasoning is a high-quality opinion. An opinion not backed up by same is a low-quality opinion. So you may be as convinced as you like that less guns or no guns is a desideratum, but until you can articulate why you are so convinced, you will never be able to make an argument that may sway someone to agree, or at least re-think her position. Without an argument, all you can do is join the chorus of the already-convinced; you cannot make a meaningful contribution to the discussion.
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,396
94
48
this isn't some kind of debate forum so there are no rules to what you can state and what you can't.

Trumps a horses ass. I don't need to prove that with cites which are pointless anyway thanks to trump and fake news. But you type trump is a horses ass and wow! google has lots of cites about it...but fake news so...
AGREE. (and Trump IS a horses ass --which is actually very diplomatic description of him ;-)

The only "rules that matter are the common sense ones.....and of course the simple one of NO poster ATTACKS ) Again......common sense.;-)

********

This horses ass might start doing HIS job AND start dealing is something that resembles FACTS. Theonly source of fake news is the Trump gang in Wash.

Interesting how he minimizes the number of troops lost under his watch or just ignores it .....until he is called on it. Now his boorishness has topped even himself. ( the one call that we know of to a surviving family. The horses ass is missing the "human"gene.

He is beyond being a basic pathological liar. (and Manipulator ) But then sociopaths have no empathy, are unable to sympathize, and feel no remorse for anything they do /they don't even bother t "Justify it in their own minds......as in their minds they are always right. This "ass" can insult Kelly , by using his dead son for his prejudice against Obama. He is so nasty that sometimes words fail.. And he has no internal "conscience" or checks or awareness as to how he comes across. He doesn't care........and in his mental make up he doesn't have to . He has no boundaries.

reference : Book called : Mask of Sanity.
 
Last edited: