Trudeau 'welcomes' ethics probe of alleged PMO interference in SNC-Lavalin case
- Thread starter Danbones
- Start date
Haha, that's a good one! Very consistent - NOT: you might say it lacks integrity
If you were talking about me are you afraid to say so directly?
No I would just like you to answer the exact question I asked - or explain why you can't. Yes or no would do it, together - of course - with any explanation you feel necessary. But why not a direct answer to this very simple question:
Are you saying that most FN people value the Indian Act and want it left as-is?
Feel free to just say "No, I'm not saying that," or "Yes, I'm saying that."
If you think I may have been on this forum before, but can't remember the username, we have that in common. If you figure it out please let me know. But we'd need to get the password as well. And trying to update an account, I've seen the really frustrating message "That name is already in use."
Meanwhile, back at the SNC Lavalin Justin Trudeau scandal, unnamed sources (wink) Liberal operatives leak an interesting story trying to again paint Jody Wilson Raybould as difficult.
And here is how low and scumbag the Liberal Government operatives are.
And they said Stephen Harper was a dick.
TM: I apologize and take it all back about you not answering my question. Way back at #775 you said "Nope."
Sorry, sorry, sorry!
You get one free insult without response.
OK, two.
Last edited:
Two faced maybe but that would be truly bizarre. How would it work - can you draw us a picture?
No, not really. Although I have a couple gay friends, I don't go in for that sort of thing, but thanks for the homophobic baiting.
Always your last bastion of the lost argument.
Nick Nanos: "Wilson-Raybould and Philpot have become enablers of the Conservatives." You go Nick. LOL
As for making jury composition mirror the ethnic mix of the populace, I see no practical way of achieving that. How many ethnic identities would have to be identified? The mind boggles. I think a case could be made for trying to ensure indigenous representation, as they are the original inhabitants, and especially in cases where natives are involved as accused or defendants. But like many over-simplified issues I find it difficult to evaluate the proposal and even more difficult to visualize its implementation.
All of which means, I guess, that I think JW-R's suggestion is just impossible to work with.
All of which means, I guess, that I think JW-R's suggestion is just impossible to work with.
Ssssh don’t remind them about the corruption of native leadership. Come on we need reconciliation.
There is a lot that's suspect with this whole mess. I get that you are not impressed with Philpot ad JWR's disloyalty, but it's quite possible your disgust is misdirected. The more I look at the obvious, overt, and aggressive effort underway to willingly divert ethics and justice to protect Trudeau's narrative (which even now seems to change almost daily), the more I think that it's possible this may actually be certain people within the Liberal party trying to scandalize their incompetent, inept, virtue signalling leader in an effort to force his resignation before the next election.
There seems to be one of two possibilities...either Trudeau is leaking extremely confidential information about Supreme Court applicants to try and discredit JWR, or members of Trudeau's inner circle are leaking this information to try and discredit Trudeau. Either option is bad for Trudeau, and neither is the result of Philpott or JWR's "disloyalty".
Leak detailing Supreme Court appointment rift only shows how little Trudeau’s camp respects the rule of law
“It is outrageous that there is a leak with respect to the Supreme Court judicial appointment process,” Toronto Liberal MP Nathaniel Erskine-Smith told the House of Commons ethics committee on Tuesday. “People from all parties ought to condemn that kind of thing.”
...
“Agree,” replied Senator Percy Downe, who served as Mr. Chrétien’s chief of staff. “Appalling behaviour.”
How much longer will Justin Trudeau be able to keep his caucus and party together, after committing so many missteps? How much more political damage is he willing to sustain to prevent Ms. Wilson-Raybould and Jane Philpott, who also resigned from cabinet in protest, from talking about the cabinet shuffle that eventually led to their resignations?
How much more damage to the integrity of this country’s legal system is this Prime Minister willing to inflict, in his efforts to discredit these enemies he used to call friends?
There is good reason they refuse to testify under oath, they're guilty of criminal activity.
Canadians would put this to bed if they made that moral leap and we're willing to risk criminal charges and sacrifice their freedom in order to clear their names.