Thirty days for giving the Judge the finger....

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
He cannot change his judgement after it is pronounced.

He can... and he did. Keep running your mouth to a judge and they can keep adding days and fines as simple as that.

Doing so, especially for non-legal reasons such as her demeanor, is utter BS and I would assume illegal and a violation of her rights.

Apparently not.

She has now appologized....

Penelope Soto Apologizes To Judge. - YouTube



Would you accept it??????


Quite a different attitude I'd say.

Opiates are a scourge
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Yeah he was, just like you always are.
I'm already aware of how you feel about people that make you look stupid and point out the stupidity in your posts. It doesn't surprise me that you would feel the same about a position of authority that you have no understanding of.

He is not supposed to be petty or emotional and calling her back and changing her bond for saying adios was both.
No it wasn't. He was making a point.

Working with at risk youth, I see Judges take routes like this all the time when dealing with kids that refuse to grasp the seriousness of where they are and where they're headed.

After she apologized, he vacated the 30 day sentence, she voluntarily entered a drug treatment program, upon completion her charges will be dropped and she'll have no criminal record.

Why?

Because the Judge isn't being petty, emotional or a d*ck, he's trying to dispense justice.

If you spent more time trying to learn about the justice system we do have, instead of the giant conspiratorial justice system you think we have, you wouldn't fill threads on legal matter with as much rampant unchecked idiocy as you do.

Do I have an issue with authority?
Yes, a very immature and uneducated one. In fact it would appear that Penelope is a more mature person, go figure.

Did you read my signature?
Yes I read your out of context misquote. I was ignoring it because you get all upset, call me names and swear when I point out the stupidity you post.

I have an issue with authority claimed without my consent.
You have an issue with reality.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.

Is there any question? Lucky she didn't get 30 months!

Of course she didn't deserve it. First he dismisses her saying good-bye, then he calls her back for saying 'Adios' and sets her bond at $10,000, then mimics her accent and says 'adios' with a big grin. It would seem to me that he changed his mind about the bond after he had already dismissed her. I would like to see the entire exchange from the start to be sure but if this is what happened he deserves a big F*CK-YOU! It is hard to tell without seeing the entirety of the case but that is my take on it, there is more than what is shown in the clip. I don't care if he has a robe on, being a d*ck is being a d*ck and the robe doesn't give him the right to be one.

Can't agree Nick, when you are in court the judge is the boss.
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
Is there any question? Lucky she didn't get 30 months!



Can't agree Nick, when you are in court the judge is the boss.
That guy has a problem with authority.......except at work (in another thread)
I suspect that in real life he's a d*ck head foreman...
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
That guy has a problem with authority.......except at work (in another thread)
I suspect that in real life he's a d*ck head foreman...

I was a foreman for a while as it happens, I was also a project manager for some time. My crews were productive and happy and we finished ahead of schedule & underbudget on 8/11 projects where I had those roles. I could certainly be a harda$$ if needed (like firing a new hire after 3 days for not bringing workboots) but it was rare. My guys new the rules and what was expected and were rewarded for their outstanding performance.
 

talloola

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 14, 2006
19,576
113
63
Vancouver Island
hope she has learned a life lesson, keep opening your stupid mouth with ignorant comments, in a
courtroom, and find out what the consequences are.

I can just imagine how many times she has uttered those words and showed the finger at whomever
she wishes, well in this case she has met her match, and luckily she didn't keep on keepin on
with that behavior, or she would be serving even more time.

If there is a next time, she will know when to shut-up, suck it up, take her medicine and learn
about life, other than where she has up till this point.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
hope she has learned a life lesson, keep opening your stupid mouth with ignorant comments, in a
courtroom, and find out what the consequences are.

I can just imagine how many times she has uttered those words and showed the finger at whomever
she wishes, well in this case she has met her match, and luckily she didn't keep on keepin on
with that behavior, or she would be serving even more time.

If there is a next time, she will know when to shut-up, suck it up, take her medicine and learn
about life, other than where she has up till this point.
talloola, you'd be amazed at the eye opening experience a court room, with what appears to be a no nonsense, hardball Judge can do to a kid who's never faced real consequences.

I've seen it turn them around.

But sadly, I've also seen it fail to achieve its intended goal.
 

Sal

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 29, 2007
17,135
33
48
I think the judge did her a huge favour and that fact that is was caught on tape was excellent for her allowing her time to sober up and see how she presented when drugged as an opportunity for change.
She learned some valuable lessons:

  • you cannot challenge authority in this manner and succeed
  • drugs destroy one's ability to think and to respond in a rational acceptable manner
  • when one does the right thing, the right things happen for you
I hope she will move forward and allow this to steer her in a better direction from the one in which she was headed. The judge was quite wise and understanding.
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Not only did she deserve 30 days, the Judge had little choice. If any judge let a f-you and the finger pass (blatant disrespect), his court would soon be out of control and he'd probably wouldn't last long as a judge.
 

talloola

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 14, 2006
19,576
113
63
Vancouver Island
talloola, you'd be amazed at the eye opening experience a court room, with what appears to be a no nonsense, hardball Judge can do to a kid who's never faced real consequences.

I've seen it turn them around.

But sadly, I've also seen it fail to achieve its intended goal.

i'm sure you're right, nothing is perfect, and i'm sure kids who ended up in court, in trouble
from being in the (wrong place,
wrong time),
became bitter and sour from the experience too.

dealing with humans is an adventure.
 

wulfie68

Council Member
Mar 29, 2009
2,014
24
38
Calgary, AB
First let me just say that I had a lot of background noise while watching the first video, after watching the second I see he his Hispanic so my comment about his mimicing was off base.

Now on to the rest. He pronounced a bond and dismissed her. That is where the case ends. He is not allowed to call her back and reset the bond after the fact because she said goodbye (adios) and it didn't please him. He cannot change his judgement after it is pronounced. Doing so, especially for non-legal reasons such as her demeanor, is utter BS and I would assume illegal and a violation of her rights. If nothing else it makes him a d*ckhead and he deserved the finger & f*ck-you. Like I said, the robe does not give him license to be a d*ck, in fact it is supposed to mean he can't be one.


You're being an idiot. The judge has the final say in his courtroom, so long as he is acting within the bounds of the law and the constitution. The assertion that he can't judge her on her demeanor is absolute crap: in setting a bond that's one of the few things, aside from the offense that he has to go by. If she isn't taking the proceedings seriously, how the hell is he supposed to know she won't just blow off her trial/next proceeding and fail to appear?
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
5
36
London, Ontario
You're being an idiot. The judge has the final say in his courtroom, so long as he is acting within the bounds of the law and the constitution. The assertion that he can't judge her on her demeanor is absolute crap: in setting a bond that's one of the few things, aside from the offense that he has to go by. If she isn't taking the proceedings seriously, how the hell is he supposed to know she won't just blow off her trial/next proceeding and fail to appear?

Of course. To say nothing of the notion that being on one's best behaviour, showing remorse and contrition can at times illicit the sympathies of the court (judge) and affect sentencing or bond. It only stands to reason that behaviour in opposition to that would produce negative results when it comes to sentencing or bond.
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
You're being an idiot. The judge has the final say in his courtroom, so long as he is acting within the bounds of the law and the constitution. The assertion that he can't judge her on her demeanor is absolute crap: in setting a bond that's one of the few things, aside from the offense that he has to go by. If she isn't taking the proceedings seriously, how the hell is he supposed to know she won't just blow off her trial/next proceeding and fail to appear?

It is not him setting the bond wherever he wants based upon the charge & his opinion of her that bothers me. Where I have an issue is him setting a bond, saying "bye-bye" to her, and then calling her back and doubling the bond because she responded "adios". I usually respond to people when they say bye, most of the time I say ciao.

Think of it in terms of sentencing. Judge "I sentence you to 5 years imprisonment, bye-bye." Accused- "adios". Judge- "wait, come back. Make that 10 years imprisonment". Now that would be an outrage. Do you see where I'm coming from here? Once a judge makes a pronouncement it should stick no matter what unless there is an actual legal reason to proceed with a different charge.
 

Sal

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 29, 2007
17,135
33
48
It is not him setting the bond wherever he wants based upon the charge & his opinion of her that bothers me. Where I have an issue is him setting a bond, saying "bye-bye" to her, and then calling her back and doubling the bond because she responded "adios". I usually respond to people when they say bye, most of the time I say ciao.

Think of it in terms of sentencing. Judge "I sentence you to 5 years imprisonment, bye-bye." Accused- "adios". Judge- "wait, come back. Make that 10 years imprisonment". Now that would be an outrage. Do you see where I'm coming from here? Once a judge makes a pronouncement it should stick no matter what unless there is an actual legal reason to proceed with a different charge.
I thought that the first time too Nick...I thought...wtf...she just said adios...but once I viewed it in the context of the whole I know why he did it... but at first I thought it extremely harsh too.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
It is not him setting the bond wherever he wants based upon the charge & his opinion of her that bothers me. Where I have an issue is him setting a bond, saying "bye-bye" to her, and then calling her back and doubling the bond because she responded "adios". I usually respond to people when they say bye, most of the time I say ciao.
It isn't just what she said.

Think of it in terms of sentencing. Judge "I sentence you to 5 years imprisonment, bye-bye." Accused- "adios". Judge- "wait, come back. Make that 10 years imprisonment". Now that would be an outrage.
I've seen a Judge do that. Not over how someone said good bye, but for how they reacted.

Do you see where I'm coming from here?
Yep, you're coming from a place of limited knowledge.

Once a judge makes a pronouncement it should stick no matter what unless there is an actual legal reason to proceed with a different charge.
Not until the court clerk fills out the paper work, the Judge signs it and the court officer files it, is it set in sand.

You can be walking out of the building and be stopped and the terms of the pronouncement changed.